| Literature DB >> 34257821 |
Petar Vukicevic1,2, Aleksandra Klisic3, Vojislava Neskovic2,4, Luka Babic1, Aleksandar Mikic5,6, Natasa Bogavac-Stanojevic7, Milos Matkovic6,8, Svetozar Putnik6,8, Nemanja Aleksic6,8, Jelena Kotur-Stevuljevic7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have shown that the red cell distribution width- (RDW-) to-platelet (PLT) count ratio (i.e., RPR) and the mean platelet volume (MPV)/PLT ratio (i.e. MPR) are more sensitive markers of atherosclerosis-connected risk than RDW and PLT alone. The present study is aimed at investigating the oxidative stress status and these two new markers of platelet activation in two different heart surgery modalities: cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). We also aimed to test the possible relationship between RPR and MPR, respectively, and the severity and complexity of atherosclerotic plaque, measured as Syntax Score. Patients and Methods. A total of 107 patients encompassed this prospective study (i.e., 60 patients in CPB group and 47 patients in OPCAB). Blood samples were drawn at several time intervals: before skin incision (t1), immediately after intervention (t2), 6 h (t3), 24 h (t4), 48 h (t5), and 96 h after cessation of the operation (t6).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34257821 PMCID: PMC8257340 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8915253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
General characteristics of the study groups.
| Variable | CPB group | OPCAB |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 63.6 ± 9.3 | 64.7 ± 9.3 | ns |
| Gender (males/females), | 48/12 | 32/15 | ns |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.9 ± 3.8 | 27.0 ± 3.3 | 0.006 |
| Obesity∗ | 9/28/23 | 13/25/9 | ns |
| Normal weight/overweight/obese, | (15/47/37) | (28/53/19) | |
| Hypertension, | 52 (88) | 41 (87) | ns |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 23 (39) | 11 (23) | ns |
| Hyperlipidemia, | 40 (68) | 30 (64) | ns |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, | 9 (15) | 3 (6) | ns |
| Smoking, | 42 (71) | 33 (70) | ns |
| Myocardial infarction, | 33 (56) | 28 (60) | ns |
| Peripheral arterial disease, | 22 (37) | 24 (51) | ns |
| Family history, | 45 (76) | 35 (74) | ns |
|
| |||
| EuroSCORE Logistic | 6 (3-8) | 6 (4-9) | ns |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction, % | 50.9 ± 9.2 | 48.8 ± 10.8 | ns |
| Syntax Score | 32.2 ± 9.29 | 20.7 ± 7.9 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
|
| 57 (97) | 44 (94) | ns |
| Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, | 51 (86) | 42 (89) | ns |
| Calcium antagonists, | 18 (30) | 18 (38) | ns |
| Nitrates, | 54 (92) | 40 (85) | ns |
| Statins, | 42 (71) | 33 (70) | ns |
| Oral antidiabetics, | 13 (22) | 9 (19) | ns |
| Insulin, | 10 (17) | 2 (4) | 0.040 |
| Diuretics, | 19 (32) | 17 (36) | ns |
∗Comparison performed by the χ2 test.
Figure 1MPR (a) and RPR (b) according to bypass number and surgery modality during different study points. aP < 0.05, aaP < 0.01, and aaaP < 0.001 vs. the 2 bp CPB group, bP < 0.05, bbP < 0.01, and bbbP < 0.001 vs. the 3 bp CPB group. The Kruskal-Wallis test and then the Mann-Whitney U test.
Correlation between platelet activity indices, MPR and RPR with Syntax Score in coronary artery bypass grafting patients.
| Syntax Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter |
| Parameter |
|
| MPR t1 | – | RPR t1 | – |
| MPR t2 | – | RPR t2 | 0.229∗ |
| MPR t3 | 0.350∗∗∗ | RPR t3 | 0.374∗∗∗ |
| MPR t4 | 0.321∗∗ | RPR t4 | 0.340∗∗∗ |
| MPR t5 | 0.329∗∗ | RPR t5 | 0.374∗∗∗ |
| MPR t6 | 0.282∗∗ | RPR t6 | 0.316∗∗ |
ρ: Spearman's rho. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 2Oxidative stress status parameters at t5 (48 h after surgery), when platelet and erythrocyte indices showed the peak increment.
Binary logistic regression analysis for the association of Syntax Score with RPR and MPR increase above the 75th percentile value 48 hours after the surgery.
| Syntax Score | Wald | Odds ratio | 95th CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPR 48 h, | ||||
| Unadjusted Syntax Score | 7.38 | 1.068 | 1.018-1.120 | 0.007 |
| Adjusted Syntax Score for RPR b.s. | 6.64 | 1.068 | 1.016-1.122 | 0.010 |
| Adjusted Syntax Score for oxidative stress parameter model | 9.76 | 1.084 | 1.028-1.140 | 0.002 |
| MPR 48 h, | ||||
| Unadjusted Syntax Score | 8.83 | 1.079 | 1.026-1.135 | 0.003 |
| Adjusted Syntax Score for MPR b.s. | 9.38 | 1.093 | 1.032-1.156 | 0.002 |
| Adjusted Syntax Score for oxidative stress parameter model | 10.80 | 1.094 | 1.037-1.153 | 0.001 |
b.s.: before surgery.
Figure 3ROC curve for the postoperative complication prediction accuracy.
ROC curve parameters for postoperative complication prediction.
| Test result variable(s) | AUC (SE) | 95th CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Syntax Score | 0.668 (0.065) | 0.540-0.796 | 0.038 |
| Model MPR+Syntax Score | 0.700 (0.077) | 0.550-0.851 | 0.013 |
| Model RPR+Syntax Score | 0.692 (0.071) | 0.552-0.832 | 0.017 |
| Model MPR+RPR+Syntax Score | 0.736 (0.061) | 0.616-0.856 | 0.003 |
ROC parameters: area under the curve (AUC), standard error (SE), 95th confidence interval, and P for Syntax Score. Models: SS in combination with MPR, RPR, and all three parameters.