| Literature DB >> 29038582 |
Steven Dajnowicz1,2, Ryne C Johnston3, Jerry M Parks3, Matthew P Blakeley4, David A Keen5, Kevin L Weiss2, Oksana Gerlits6, Andrey Kovalevsky7, Timothy C Mueser8.
Abstract
Enzymes depenEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29038582 PMCID: PMC5643538 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01060-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Structure of AAT with α-methylaspartate. The PLP cofactor in the external aldimine (chain A in light green) and the internal aldimine (chain B in dark green) forms are shown in yellow and gray carbon scheme, respectively. In the external aldimine, R292 and R386 interact directly with the carboxylate groups of α-methylaspartate. These interactions are not present in the internal aldimine. Here and in Figs. 2, 3, and 5, the deuterium atoms are colored green and the external aldimine is labeled as PLA
Fig. 2Internal aldimine reactivity and substrate activation. a Internal aldimine state in the AAT-α-methylaspartate neutron structure. Here and in Figs. 3 and 5, the light blue mesh is the 2|F o|−|F c| nuclear scattering length density at 1σ and the magenta mesh is the omit |F o|−|F c| difference nuclear scattering length density at 3σ. For clarity, the omit |F o|−|F c| difference nuclear scattering maps are presented for deuterium atoms on PLP. The dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds. b Michaelis complex and proposed substrate activation with the proton transferred upon substrate binding shown in red. A direct or indirect proton transfer mechanism is plausible. Two possible resonance structures of the internal aldimine are shown
Fig. 3Neutron structure of the external aldimine. a External aldimine state in the AAT-α-methylaspartate neutron structure. b Close-up of the D atom that is equidistant between the NSB and carboxylate oxygen. c External aldimine and the catalytic base, K258. For clarity, the omit |F o|−|F c| difference nuclear scattering map is presented for the deuterium atom on PLA
Fig. 5Extended hydrogen bond network near N1-PLP in the internal aldimine a and external aldimine b. c Proposed Grotthüss proton hopping mechanism, leading to the protonation of H189 during the formation of the external aldimine. For clarity, the omit |F o|−|F c| difference nuclear scattering maps are presented for deuterium atoms on His residues
X-ray and neutron crystallographic data collection and refinement
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| ||
| Beamline/facility | LADI-III/ILL | |
| Resolution range (Å) | 55.19–2.20 (2.32–2.20) | |
| Space group | P212121 | |
| Cell dimensions | ||
| | 55.53, 123.82, 129.73 | |
| | 90, 90, 90 | |
| No. reflections total | 96,244 (9488) | |
| No. reflections unique | 32,950 (3950) | |
| Completeness (%) | 72.9 (60.4) | |
| | 6.5 (4.9) | |
| | 0.142 (0.186) | |
| Redundancy | 2.9 (2.4) | |
|
| ||
| Beamline/facility | Rigaku HighFlux Home-Source | Rigaku HighFlux Home-Source |
| Resolution range (Å) | 50.00–2.00 (2.07–2.00) | 40.00–1.9 (1.97–1.90) |
| No. reflections unique | 62,791 (5739) | 69,048 (7027) |
| Completeness (%) | 95.5 (92.9) | 94.4 (97.9) |
| | 28.3 (5.2) | 24.2 (3.4) |
| | 0.031 (0.470) | 0.052 (0.376) |
| Redundancy | 6.3 (6.3) | 4.6 (4.6) |
|
|
| |
| Resolution (neutron, Å) | 20–2.20 | n/a |
| Resolution (X-ray, Å) | 20–2.0 | 30–1.9 |
| Data rejection criteria | No observation and | | n/a |
| Sigma cutoff | 2.5 | n/a |
| No. reflections (neutron) | 32,558 | n/a |
| No. reflections (X-ray) | 55,493 | 64,425 |
| | 0.234/0.256 | n/a |
| | 0.197/0.220 | 0.185/0.225 |
| No. of atoms | ||
| Protein including H and D | 12,978 | 6429 |
| Cofactor/ligand | 81 | 48 |
| Water | 735 (245 D2O) | 232 (232 O atoms) |
| R.m.s deviations | ||
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Bond angles (°) | 1.04 | 1.02 |
| Average | ||
| Protein | 28.7 | 31.4 |
| Cofactor/ligand | 27.3 | 17.1 |
| Water | 39.7 | 35.2 |
Fig. 4Proposed mechanism for the first half-reaction of AAT. The mechanism starts from the external aldimine obtained by substrate attack on the internal aldimine, as shown in Fig. 2b
Fig. 6X-ray structures of AAT at different pH. Internal aldimine at pH 7.5 a and pH 4.0 b. The gray mesh is the omit |F o|−|F c| difference electron density at 5σ
Fig. 7Natural bond orbitals in the NSB-deprotonated/N1-protonated internal aldimine model. a πSB−C4′ → π*C3−C4, b πC3−C4 → π*SB−C4′, and c lone-pair (lp) interactions