Literature DB >> 28986517

Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor Cells for Evaluating Short- and Long-Term Efficacy of Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Shihui Ma1,2, Feihai Ling2, Anping Gui2, Shifeng Chen2, Yanxiang Sun3, Zhou Li4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The present study investigated the role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) counts in predicting the short- and long-term efficacy of chemotherapy for breast cancer (BC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Peripheral venous blood was extracted from 187 BC patients. CTCs were measured by flow cytometry. Spearman's correlation analysis was performed to examine the correlation between the efficacy of chemotherapy and CTC counts. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to estimate the predictive value of CTC counts. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to calculate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for prognosis of BC. RESULTS Complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) was achieved by 65.8% of BC patients. After chemotherapy, CTC counts were decreased in both the CR + PR and SD + PD groups. Spearman's correlation analysis indicated that CTC counts before chemotherapy were positively correlated with clinical response to chemotherapy (r=0.45, P<0.05). For predicting clinical response to chemotherapy, CTC counts yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.958, with sensitivity reaching 96.9% and specificity reaching 85.4%. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis indicated that tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging, lymph node metastasis (LNM), ki-67, endocrine therapy, and CTC counts were risk factors for prognosis of BC. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that BC patients with CTCs ³8 exhibited poor response to chemotherapy and poor OS. CTC counts can serve as an indicator in predicting short- and long-term efficacy of chemotherapy for BC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28986517      PMCID: PMC5642643          DOI: 10.12659/msm.903736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignancies threatening female health, with high prevalence throughout the world [1]. In 2012, it was estimated that 272 700 BC cases were newly diagnosed among women and approximately 61 500 women died of BC in China [2]. The therapy for BC primarily consists of surgical intervention, radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery, hormone therapy, and molecular-targeted therapy [3]. In spite of increasing benefits from adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatments, there are still early BC patients at high risk of metastasis and relapse [4]. Clinically, the common methods used to detect BC include ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mammography, and serum tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 135 (CA153) [5,6]. Recently, the use of molecular biomarkers has been reported to help BC patients receive optimal treatment, and established biomarkers, including estrogen receptor(ER), progesterone receptor (PR), epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67, play important roles in the subcategorization of BC to predict prognosis and decide the specific treatment plans for BC patients [7,8]. Also, genetic and epigenetic association studies of microRNAs and its host gene may provide a theoretical basis to reveal the relationship between them and may help explore the mechanism of BC [9]. Nonetheless, only a small number of tumor cells are considered to be involved in BC development and progression. More improvements are required and recent advancements in molecular diagnostics should translate into more personalized treatment for better clinical outcomes. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are reported to circulate in the peripheral blood of patients diagnosed with breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancers [10-15]. They are rare in healthy individuals or in patients who have nonmalignant disease [16]. Immunomagnetic platforms are used for the reproducible measurement of CTCs at low frequencies and in small blood volumes [17]. It has been reported that detection of CTCs in peripheral blood of BC patients has great value in the early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of BC [18,19], and the study of its molecular level is beneficial to the development of new molecular-targeted drugs and the discovery of mechanism underlying tumor metastasis [20,21]. A previous study revealed a strong relationship between CTCs and the progression of radiographic disease in patients undergoing chemotherapy or endocrine therapy for metastatic BC (MBC) [17]. Furthermore, Cristofanilli et al. reported that the enumeration of CTCs prior to treatment may be an independent predictor of poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with MBC [22]. Similarly, Giordano et al. found that higher CTCs counts at any time indicated the poor prognosis of advanced BC, and the dynamics of CTCs can effectively predict prognosis in patients with advanced BC [23]. A variety of detection methods for CTCs, such as immunocytochemistry (ICC) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), can improve the sensitivity and specificity of CTCs to some extent [24-27]. The present study, by detecting CTCs with flow cytometry before and after chemotherapy, investigated the role of CTC counts in predicting short- and long-term efficacy of chemotherapy for BC.

Material and Methods

Study subjects

A total of 187 female BC patients, admitted into our hospital between January 2013 and October 2013, were randomly selected for this study. These patients, who were pathologically diagnosed as having BC by fine-needle aspiration biopsy, were aged 26–70 years, with a median age of 51 years. Histopathological types were: 139 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), 23 cases of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), 10 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 15 cases of other types. Tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging before chemotherapy was: 17 cases in stage IIa, 76 cases in IIb, 62 cases in IIIa, and 32 cases in IIIb. Among these BC patients, there were 133 undergoing endocrine therapy. Inclusion criteria were: female; an expected survival of more than 6 months; a complete catalogue of clinical data; pathologically confirmed BC by physical examination, color Doppler ultrasound, mammography screening, X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and core-needle breast biopsy; no history of other primary malignancy; and normal indicators of routine laboratory blood and urine testing, blood coagulation, liver, and kidney functions. Exclusion criteria were: initial diagnosis during pregnancy and lactation; evidence of active infection, coagulation disorders, acute and chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases; associated with cardiac dysfunction, liver and kidney diseases, or failing to undergone chemotherapy or to visit the doctor on time due to personal reasons; failing to complete chemotherapy regimens or experiencing a delay (more than 2 weeks) in initiation of chemotherapy due to severe toxicity and side effects; being given related therapies except adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy at 3 months before blood extraction; incomplete record; and poor compliance. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject.

Treatment regimes

All patients underwent 3 cycles of 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC). Continuous intravenous infusion of Fluorouracil (5-Fu) (initial dose of 500 mg/m2, d 1 and 8) for 4 h; intravenous infusion of epirubicin (EPI) (initial dose of 50 mg/m2, d 1); intravenous infusion of Cytoxan (CTX) (initial dose of 500 mg/m2, d 1 and 8); and 1 cycle lasted for 3–4 weeks. After 2 weeks of chemotherapy, the operation was performed, and 2 weeks after that the planned chemotherapy performed. Estrogen receptor (ER)- or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive patients underwent endocrine therapy using tamoxifen following 3 cycles of chemotherapy.

Specimen collection and immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Before chemotherapy (T0), 1 day before the third cycle of chemotherapy (T1), and 1 week after the third cycle of chemotherapy (T2), fasting venous blood (7.5 ml) extracted from each subject in the morning was put into tubes containing ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid EDTA. Tumor tissues collected from BC patients were fixed by 10% formalin. These paraffin-embedded slices were subject to IHC for detection of expressions of ER, PR, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), and Ki-67. All results were independently confirmed by 2 or more pathologists, as was the further identification of molecular classification in BC.

Extraction of CTCs and antibody labeling

Venous blood-containing tubes were diluted by equal amounts of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and buffy coats were aspirated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation (500 g, 25 min). With the addition of 5 ml PBS, the supernatant was removed by centrifugation (2200 rpm, 6 min). After the addition of 0.5 ml PBS and 1 ml fixation, the tubes with marks were stored at 4°C for 30 min. Subsequently, the tubes were subject to the first centrifugation (2200 rpm, 3 min) and the supernatant was aspirated. After resuspension in 4 ml PBS, the second centrifugation (2200 rpm, 3 min) was performed and the supernatant was also aspirated. Following the addition of 1–2 ml cell-penetrating agents, the tubes were subject to the third centrifugation (2200 rpm, 3 min), with the supernatant aspirated. Then, the forth centrifugation (2200 rpm, 3 min) was performed for removal of the supernatant after resuspension in 4 ml of 2% serum PBS. Blood samples were resuspended with 70 ul 2% serum PBS, and then were added to l0 ul FcR. Ten minutes later, we added 2.5 ul Epcam, 20 ul CD45, and 5 ul CK18 antibody to the tubes, and stored them in a refrigerator for 20 min. Again, we added 4 ml of 2% serum PBS to the tubes and centrifuged them at 2200 rpm for 3 min. After the removal of the supernatant, the samples were resuspended with 500 ul 2% serum PBS and finally put into Eppendorf (EP) tubes for flow cytometry detection.

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)

Clinical response to chemotherapy was evaluated by measurement of tumor size using MRI. According to the revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [28], clinical response to chemotherapy was classified into complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions), partial response (PR, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter (LD) of target lesions), stable disease (SD, neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease [PD]), and PD (at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions). The BC patients with CR and PR were included into a CR + PR group and those with SD and PD into a SD + PD group. Response rate was defined as the rates of CR + PR.

Follow-up

The follow-up was made by phone call and outpatient office visits and ended on October 31, 2016. The follow-up started on the day operation was performed and ended with death, missing visit, or deadline. Among 187 patients, 7 were lost to follow-up, giving a follow-up rate of 96.3%. OS was defined as the time from BC diagnosis (surgery) to either death (regardless of cause of death) or the last known date alive. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from surgery to events such as relapse or metastasis, dearth from any cause, or the last known date alive.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Continuous data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for comparisons of 3 or more independent groups, and the t-test was used for comparisons of 2 groups. Categorical data are expressed as ratio and percentage and the chi-square test was performed for comparison in a group. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between the efficacy of chemotherapy and CTCs. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to estimate the predictive value of CTC counts for clinical response to chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate DFS and OS of BC patients undergoing chemotherapy. The log-rank test is employed for examining treatment differences in survival between 2 treatment groups. Cox regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for prognosis of BC. A significance level of P<0.05 was set as a statistically significant difference.

Results

CTC count at T0, T1, and T2 and its correlation with clinical response to chemotherapy

Among 187 patients, there were 22 with CR (11.8%), 101 with PR (54.0%), 56 with SD (29.9%), and 8 with PD (4.3%). CR + PR was achieved by 123 cases, 65.8% of BC patients. According to clinical response to chemotherapy, BC patients with CR and PR were assigned into the CR + PR group and those with SD and PD into the SD + PD group. As shown in Figure 1, CTC counts were lower in the CR + PR group than in the SD + PD group at T0, T1, and T2 (P<0.05). After chemotherapy, CTC counts were decreased in both the CR + PR and SD + PD groups (P<0.05). Spearman’s correlation analysis indicated that CTC counts at T0 were positively correlated with clinical response to chemotherapy (r=0.66, P<0.05).
Figure 1

Comparison of CTC counts at T0, T1, and T2 between the CR + PR group and the SD + PD group. T0, before chemotherapy; T1, 1 day before the third cycle of chemotherapy; T2, 1 week after the third cycle of chemotherapy; * P<0.05 compared with the CR + PR group; # P<0.05 compared with the T0; & P<0.05 compared with the T2. CTC – circulating tumor cell; CR – complete response; PR – partial response; SD – stable disease; PD – progressive disease.

The prediction of CTC count at T0 for clinical response to chemotherapy in BC

As shown in Figure 2, for predicting clinical response to chemotherapy, with cutoff of 8 for CTCs, CTC counts yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.958, with the sensitivity reaching 96.9% and the specificity reaching 85.4% (95%CI: 0.927–0.990). These data suggested that CTC counts exhibited good performance for predicting clinical response to chemotherapy.
Figure 2

The predictive performance of CTC counts at T0 for clinical response to chemotherapy in BC, estimated by the ROC curve. CTC counts yielded an AUC of 0.898 for predicting clinical response to chemotherapy, with sensitivity reaching 82.6% and specificity reaching 87.1%. T0 – before chemotherapy; CTC – circulating tumor cell; BC – breast cancer; ROC – receiver operating characteristic; AUC – area under the curve.

Association between the CTC count at T0 and clinicopathological characteristics of BC patients

CTCs-negative patients were defined as those with CTCs <8 at T0 and CTCs-positive patients as those with CTCs ≥8 at T0. As shown in Table 1, CTC counts were associated with tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging, tumor size, lymph node metastasis (LNM), ki-67, molecular classification, and endocrine therapy (P < 0.05), but were not related with age, menstruation, family medical history, histopathological types, tumor thrombus, ER, PR, or HER-2 (P>0.05).
Table 1

Association between the CTC count at T0 and clinicopathological characteristics of BC patients.

Clinicopathological characteristicsCaseCTCsχ2P
Negative (n, %)Positive (n, %)
Age (years)<509049 (26.2)41 (21.9)0.550.46
≥509758 (31.0)39 (20.9)
MenstruationYes10866 (35.3)42 (22.5)1.580.209
No7941 (21.9)38 (20.3)
Family medical historyNo16595 (50.8)70 (37.4)0.070.787
Yes2212 (6.4)10 (5.3)
TNM stagingIIa1712 (6.4)5 (2.7)16.420.001
IIb7653 (28.3)23 (12.3)
IIIa6223 (12.3)39 (20.9)
IIIb3219 (10.2)13 (7.0)
Histological classificationIDC13983 (44.4)56 (29.9)1.490.685
ILC2311 (5.9)12 (6.4)
SCC105 (2.7)5 (2.7)
Others158 (4.3)7 (3.7)
Tumor size≤5 cm14792 (49.2)55 (29.4)8.080.005
>5 cm4015 (8.0)25 (13.4)
Tumor thrombusNo11872 (38.5)46 (24.6)1.880.170
Yes6935 (18.7)34 (18.2)
LNMNo3626 (13.9)10 (5.3)4.100.043
Yes15181 (43.3)70 (37.4)
ERNegative7746 (24.6)31 (16.6)0.340.560
Positive11061 (32.6)49 (26.2)
PRNegative9855 (29.4)43 (23.0)0.100.750
Positive8952 (27.8)37 (19.8)
HER-2Negative6435 (18.7)29 (15.5)0.250.614
Positive12372 (38.5)51 (27.3)
Ki-67Negative5237 (19.8)15 (8.0)5.710.017
Positive13570 (37.4)65 (34.8)
Molecular classificationLuminal A6744 (23.5)23 (12.3)9.290.026
Luminal B6038 (20.3)22 (11.8)
HER-23212 (6.4)20 (10.7)
TNBC2813 (7.0)15 (8.0)
Endocrine therapyYes13370 (37.4)63 (33.7)3.960.047
No5437 (19.8)17 (9.1)0.550.46

CTC – circulating tumor cell; T0 – before chemotherapy; BC – breast cancer; TNM – tumor node metastasis; IDC – invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC – invasive lobular carcinoma; SCC – squamous cell carcinoma; LNM – lymph node metastasis; ER – estrogen receptor; PR – progesterone receptor; HER-2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; TNBC – triple negative breast cancer.

The Kaplan-Meier method for determination of factors influencing DFS and OS of BC patients

The BC patients exhibited a 3-year OS rate of 78.1% (median OS: 28.68±0.52 months) and a DFS rate of 62.0% (median DFS: 25.66±1.03 months). The Kaplan-Meier results suggested that factors influencing DFS and OS of patients included TNM staging, tumor size, LNM, ki-67, molecular classification, endocrine therapy, and CTC counts (P<0.05). The DFS and OS of patients were not associated with age, menstruation, family medical history, histopathological types, tumor thrombus, ER, PR, or HER-2 (P>0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2

The Kaplan-Meier method for determination of factors influencing DFS and OS of BC patients.

Clinicopathological characteristicsCaseOSPDFSP
Age (years)<509028.93±0.700.99425.47±0.990.985
≥509728.44±0.7624.66±1.03
MenstruationYes10829.01±0.670.31726.05±0.910.066
No7928.22±0.8123.68±1.14
Family medical historyNo16528.92±0.540.43325.20±0.760.581
Yes2226.86±1.7723.86±2.25
TNM stagingIIa1730.78±1.190.00229.56±1.640.001
IIb7630.17±0.6027.13±1.00
IIIa6228.17±0.8923.19±1.27
IIIb3224.96±1.7821.22±1.98
Histological classificationIDC13928.51±0.620.86724.76±0.840.745
ILC2329.70±0.8926.39±1.72
SCC1027.00±3.1722.70±3.78
Others1529.87±1.4227.20±2.26
Tumor size≤5 cm14729.48±0.500.01226.21±0.730.007
>5 cm4025.73±1.5020.78±1.85
Tumor thrombusNo11829.10±0.610.27425.77±0.880.135
Yes6927.95±0.9523.81±1.23
LNMNo3630.81±0.770.03128.64±1.150.028
Yes15128.16±0.6124.19±0.83
ERNegative7729.26±0.740.31825.21±1.150.587
Positive11028.27±0.7124.94±0.92
PRNegative9828.93±0.700.61525.28±0.980.558
Positive8928.40±0.7824.80±1.06
HER-2Negative6429.49±0.760.26225.86±1.150.438
Positive12328.25±0.6824.63±0.91
Ki-67Negative5229.79±0.870.04527.60±1.270.003
Positive13528.25±0.6324.07±0.85
Molecular classificationLuminal A6729.63±0.750.03827.22±1.08<0.001
Luminal B6029.05±0.9026.47±1.22
HER-23228.70±1.1122.28±1.70
TNBC2825.57±1.7619.96±1.99
Endocrine therapyYes13330.52±0.650.02128.04±1.060.012
No5427.92±0.6723.84±0.89
CTCsNegative10330.15±0.56<0.00127.54±0.82<0.001
Positive8426.70±0.9121.71±1.17

OS – overall survival; DFS – disease-free survival; T0 – before chemotherapy; BC – breast cancer; TNM – tumor node metastasis; IDC – invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC – invasive lobular carcinoma; SCC – squamous cell carcinoma; LNM – lymph node metastasis; ER – estrogen receptor; PR – progesterone receptor; HER-2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; TNBC – triple negative breast cancer; CTCs – circulating tumor cells.

Cox regression analysis for determination of factors influencing the prognosis of BC patients

With DFS and OS as dependent variables, and TNM staging, tumor size, LNM, Ki-67, molecular classification, endocrine therapy, and CTC counts as independent variable, the Cox regression analysis was performed, showing that TNM staging, LNM, Ki-67, and CTC counts were independent risk factors, but endocrine therapy was a protective factor for the prognosis of BC patients (P<0.05). However, tumor size and molecular classification were not associated with DFS and OS of BC patients (P>0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3

The cox regression analysis for determination of factors influencing the prognosis of BC patients.

Histological classificationOSDFS
PEXP95%CIPEXP95%CI
TNM staging0.0041.921.23–2.990.0021.641.20–2.25
Tumor size0.6091.220.56–2.650.9521.020.57–1.81
LNM0.0194.251.27–14.180.0242.141.10–4.14
Ki-670.0432.951.03–8.450.0013.651.64–8.11
Molecular classification0.5640.910.65–1.260.2721.140.90–1.45
Endocrine therapy0.0410.370.14–0.960.0430.530.29–0.98
CTCs0.0102.621.26–5.470.0361.731.04–2.88

OS – overall survival; DFS – disease-free survival; T0 – before chemotherapy; BC – breast cancer; TNM – tumor node metastasis; LNM – lymph node metastasis; CTCs – circulating tumor cells.

Discussion

CTCs in the peripheral blood are considered to be a predictor for the prognosis of BC, which is of great help in monitoring and treatment [29]. In consideration of this point, flow cytometry was performed to count CTCs in patients with BC before and after chemotherapy, and the predictive value of CTC count was evaluated using the ROC curve. The results indicated that CTC counts had a high predictive value for both short- and long-term efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with BC. The results first indicated that patients in the CR + PR group had lower CTC counts than the SD + PD group before and after chemotherapy. Several methods have been used in practical measurement of CTC counts, such as positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and flow cytometry [30,31]. To obtain reliable results, flow cytometry was used in the present study to measure the number of CTCs. Generally speaking, more than 2 CTCs per 7.5 ml of blood are present in 60% of patients with MBC [32]. The measurement of CTCs before and after surgical treatment for esophageal squamous cancer (EAC) is of great help in predicting tumor recurrence [33]. Chemotherapy is reported to be an effective way to kill CTCs in the blood of cancer patients, which is superior to tumor surgery and radiation therapy [34]. Consistent with our finding that CTCs were decreased after chemotherapy, another study found that CTCs in patients with urothelial carcinoma are lower in CR + PR patients after chemotherapy [35]. In line with those findings, Spearman correlation analysis also showed that CTC counts before chemotherapy was positively correlated with the clinical response to chemotherapy. Additionally, CTC counts in the blood before and after surgical treatment are related to indicators of long-term efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with BC, including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS [36]. The presence of CTCs prior to treatment was significantly related to progression-free survival (PFS) and OS [37]. Also, the 3-year follow-up indicated the CTCs count was associated with disease-free survival and OS in patients with BC. The CTC count had an AUC of 0.958, as well as high sensitivity and specificity as evaluated with the ROC curve. Thus, the CTC count in the peripheral blood of patients with BC before chemotherapy has a predictive value for both short- and long-term efficacy of chemotherapy. In the present study, we also analyzed the correlation between CTC counts and clinicopathological features of BC patients. As a preoperative staging factor in EAC, the CTC count is considered to be independent of tumor-related indicators, such as tumor stage and grade, histological subtype, and lymph node invasion [33]. However, in patients with BC, there was a correlation between CTC counts and TNM staging, tumor size, LNM, ki-67, molecular classification, and endocrine therapy. Expression of Ki-67 protein, as a qualitative marker for cell proliferation, especially the potential for cell division [38], may predict tumor progression. Ki-67 expression is also reported to be a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with aggressive BC [39]. Here, Ki-67 was indicated to be a risk factor for the prognosis of BC, and the CTC count was associated with Ki-67 expression, which may provide a possible explanation for the mechanism underlying the ability of CTCs to predict the efficacy of treatment in BC. Endocrine therapy has been recommended as an initial therapy in HR-positive MBC [40]. The present study indicated that endocrine therapy was an independent protective factor for the prognosis of BC. Hormone receptor-negative BC consists of the Her-2 subtype, which is characterized by enrichment of the HER-2 gene, and basal cell subtype with ER and PR, of which the triple-negative type accounts for the greatest percentage [41]. The results of this study also demonstrated that the CTC count was closely associated with the molecular classification of BC. However, the CTC count has no significant association with cancer-associated markers ER/PR or HER-2 status [42], which was similar to our results.

Conclusions

To conclude, BC patients with CTCs ≥8 exhibited a worse prognosis after chemotherapy, as well as a shorter overall survival. CTC count can serve as an indicator in predicting short- and long-term efficacy of chemotherapy for BC. However, the detailed mechanism should be further investigated to verify the molecular pathway of CTCs in the progression of BC and the role of CTCs in more cancers. Our next study protocol will evaluate the radiologic response to treatment in MBC patients and evaluation of the correlation with CTC counts.
  41 in total

Review 1.  Circulating tumor cells and serum tumor biomarkers in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patrick C Ma; Lawrence Blaszkowsky; Ajit Bharti; Andras Ladanyi; Stine-Kathrein Kraeft; Adam Bruno; Arthur T Skarin; Lan Bo Chen; Ravi Salgia
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 2.  Monitoring in metastatic breast cancer: is imaging outdated in the era of circulating tumor cells?

Authors:  Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni; Volkmar Müller; Tanja Fehm; Wolfgang Janni; Brigitte Rack
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells and serum CA15-3 levels in metastatic breast cancer, single center experience, preliminary results.

Authors:  Mustafa Oktay Tarhan; Ataman Gonel; Yuksel Kucukzeybek; Cigdem Erten; Serap Cuhadar; Seyran Ceri Yigit; Aysenur Atay; Isil Somali; Ahmet Dirican; Lutfiye Demir; Mehmet Koseoglu
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

Review 4.  Molecular detection of circulating cancer cells. Role in diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of colon cancer patients.

Authors:  Bela Molnar; Ferenc Sipos; Orsolya Galamb; Zsolt Tulassay
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.404

5.  Practical utility of circulating tumour cells as biomarkers in cancer chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kazunori Otsuka; Hiroo Imai; Hiroshi Soeda; Keigo Komine; Chikashi Ishioka; Hiroyuki Shibata
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Amy S Clark; Julia Tchou; Paul Zhang; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline.

Authors:  Hope S Rugo; R Bryan Rumble; Erin Macrae; Debra L Barton; Hannah Klein Connolly; Maura N Dickler; Lesley Fallowfield; Barbara Fowble; James N Ingle; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Stephen R D Johnston; Larissa A Korde; James L Khatcheressian; Rita S Mehta; Hyman B Muss; Harold J Burstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Molecular characterization of minimal residual cancer cells in patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  B Böckmann; H J Grill; M Giesing
Journal:  Biomol Eng       Date:  2001-03

10.  Effect of Fu-Zheng-Xiao-Liu Granules on Expression of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) and Proliferation and Apoptosis of Breast Cancer Cell Line SKBR-3.

Authors:  Ting Mo; Shuangbing Yue; Huan Tian; Hong Lin; Guanglu Zhang; Zili Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-12-23
View more
  6 in total

1.  A fluorescent immunosensor for determination and imaging of circulating tumor cells based on a bifunctional DNA nanomachine.

Authors:  Ye Zhang; Shihua Luo; Bo Situ; Xinyi Ye; Yifang Huang; Bo Li; Xiujuan Jiang; Xueping Chen; Lei Zheng; Xiaohui Yan
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 2.  Profiling of Invasive Breast Carcinoma Circulating Tumour Cells-Are We Ready for the 'Liquid' Revolution?

Authors:  Marcin Braun; Aleksandra Markiewicz; Radzisław Kordek; Rafał Sądej; Hanna Romańska
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  The prognostic value of chemotherapy or endocrine therapy choice according to circulating tumor cell count in HR+HER2- metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Bin Shao; Huiping Li; Jiayang Zhang; Xiaoran Liu; Guohong Song; Hanfang Jiang; Ying Yan; Huan Wang; Jing Wang; Lijun Di
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-08

4.  Increased Expression of c-Met is Associated with Chemotherapy-Resistant Breast Cancer and Poor Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Lizhou Jia; Xiaobing Yang; Wei Tian; Siqi Guo; Wenbin Huang; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-11-16

5.  Prospective study of the relevance of circulating tumor cell status and neoadjuvant chemotherapy effectiveness in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Chao Ni; Yimin Shen; Qingqing Fang; Min Zhang; Hongjun Yuan; Jingxia Zhang; Miaochun Zhong; Yajuan Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Evaluation of the diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells with CytoSorter® CTC capture system in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Lidan Jin; Wenhe Zhao; Jun Zhang; Wenjun Chen; Tan Xie; Linbo Wang; Wanhung Fan; Shuduo Xie; Jianguo Shen; Heming Zheng; Wenxian Hu; Qun Wei; Minjun Dong; Qinchun Wang; Jun Shen; Yongcheng Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.