PURPOSE: Five or more circulating tumor cells (CTCs) per 7.5 mL of blood predicts for poorer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a prospective study to demonstrate that CTC results correlate strongly with radiographic disease progression at the time of and in advance of imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial CTC levels were obtained in patients starting a new treatment regimen for progressive, radiographically measurable MBC. Peripheral blood was collected for CTC enumeration at baseline and at 3- to 4-week intervals. Clinical outcomes were based on radiographic studies performed in 9- to 12-week intervals. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were evaluable for the CTC-imaging correlations, and 74 patients were evaluable for the PFS analysis. Median follow-up was 13.3 months. A statistically significant correlation was demonstrated between CTC levels and radiographic disease progression in patients receiving chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. This correlation applied to CTC results obtained at the time of imaging (odds ratio [OR], 6.3), 3 to 5 weeks before imaging (OR, 3.1), and 7 to 9 weeks before imaging (OR, 4.9). Results from analyses stratified by type of therapy remained statistically significant. Shorter PFS was observed for patients with five or more CTCs at 3 to 5 weeks and at 7 to 9 weeks after the start of treatment. CONCLUSION: We provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence of a strong correlation between CTC results and radiographic disease progression in patients receiving chemotherapy or endocrine therapy for MBC. These findings support the role of CTC enumeration as an adjunct to standard methods of monitoring disease status in MBC.
PURPOSE: Five or more circulating tumor cells (CTCs) per 7.5 mL of blood predicts for poorer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a prospective study to demonstrate that CTC results correlate strongly with radiographic disease progression at the time of and in advance of imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial CTC levels were obtained in patients starting a new treatment regimen for progressive, radiographically measurable MBC. Peripheral blood was collected for CTC enumeration at baseline and at 3- to 4-week intervals. Clinical outcomes were based on radiographic studies performed in 9- to 12-week intervals. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were evaluable for the CTC-imaging correlations, and 74 patients were evaluable for the PFS analysis. Median follow-up was 13.3 months. A statistically significant correlation was demonstrated between CTC levels and radiographic disease progression in patients receiving chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. This correlation applied to CTC results obtained at the time of imaging (odds ratio [OR], 6.3), 3 to 5 weeks before imaging (OR, 3.1), and 7 to 9 weeks before imaging (OR, 4.9). Results from analyses stratified by type of therapy remained statistically significant. Shorter PFS was observed for patients with five or more CTCs at 3 to 5 weeks and at 7 to 9 weeks after the start of treatment. CONCLUSION: We provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence of a strong correlation between CTC results and radiographic disease progression in patients receiving chemotherapy or endocrine therapy for MBC. These findings support the role of CTC enumeration as an adjunct to standard methods of monitoring disease status in MBC.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: G Thomas Budd; Massimo Cristofanilli; Mathew J Ellis; Allison Stopeck; Ernest Borden; M Craig Miller; Jeri Matera; Madeline Repollet; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W M M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Patrick C Ma; Lawrence Blaszkowsky; Ajit Bharti; Andras Ladanyi; Stine-Kathrein Kraeft; Adam Bruno; Arthur T Skarin; Lan Bo Chen; Ravi Salgia Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Daniel F Hayes; Massimo Cristofanilli; G Thomas Budd; Matthew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; M Craig Miller; Jeri Matera; W Jeffrey Allard; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W W M Terstappen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-07-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: E Racila; D Euhus; A J Weiss; C Rao; J McConnell; L W Terstappen; J W Uhr Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-04-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mark Jesus M Magbanua; Hope S Rugo; Denise M Wolf; Louai Hauranieh; Ritu Roy; Praveen Pendyala; Eduardo V Sosa; Janet H Scott; Jin Sun Lee; Brandelyn Pitcher; Terry Hyslop; William T Barry; Steven J Isakoff; Maura Dickler; Laura Van't Veer; John W Park Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Antonio Giordano; Hui Gao; Simone Anfossi; Evan Cohen; Michal Mego; Bang-Ning Lee; Sanda Tin; Michele De Laurentiis; Charla A Parker; Ricardo H Alvarez; Vicente Valero; Naoto T Ueno; Sabino De Placido; Sendurai A Mani; Francisco J Esteva; Massimo Cristofanilli; James M Reuben Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jeffrey B Smerage; G Thomas Budd; Gerald V Doyle; Marty Brown; Costanza Paoletti; Maria Muniz; M Craig Miller; Madeline I Repollet; David A Chianese; Mark C Connelly; Leon W W M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Christian Schindlbeck; Ulrich Andergassen; Simone Hofmann; Julia Jückstock; Udo Jeschke; Harald Sommer; Klaus Friese; Wolfgang Janni; Brigitte Rack Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-23 Impact factor: 4.553