BACKGROUNDS: The presence of ≥5 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in 7.5 ml blood is a poor prognostic marker in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in CTCs is not known. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the prognostic value of this parameter for patients with MBC who started a new line of systemic therapy. The CTC count (≥5 or <5) and the HER2 status in CTCs at the initiation of the therapy and 3-4 weeks later (first follow-up) were determined. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the 52 enrolled patients was 655.0 days (18-1,275 days). HER2-positive CTCs were present in 14 of the 52 patients (26.9%) during the study period. Eight of 33 patients (24.2%) with HER2-negative primary tumors had HER2-positive CTCs during the study period. At first follow-up, patients with HER2-positive CTCs had significantly shorter progression-free (n = 6; P = 0.001) and overall (P = 0.013) survival than did patients without HER2-positive CTCs (n = 43) in log-rank analysis. In multivariate analysis, HER2-positive CTCs at first follow-up (P = 0.029) and the number of therapies patients received before this study (P = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors in terms of progression-free survival. The number of therapies (P = 0.001) and a count of ≥5 CTCs (P = 0.043) at baseline were independent prognostic factors in terms of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that HER2 status in CTCs may be a prognostic factor for MBC. Well-powered prospective studies are necessary to determine the potential role of HER2-targeted therapies for patients with HER2-positive CTCs and HER2-negative primary tumors.
BACKGROUNDS: The presence of ≥5 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in 7.5 ml blood is a poor prognostic marker in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in CTCs is not known. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the prognostic value of this parameter for patients with MBC who started a new line of systemic therapy. The CTC count (≥5 or <5) and the HER2 status in CTCs at the initiation of the therapy and 3-4 weeks later (first follow-up) were determined. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the 52 enrolled patients was 655.0 days (18-1,275 days). HER2-positive CTCs were present in 14 of the 52 patients (26.9%) during the study period. Eight of 33 patients (24.2%) with HER2-negative primary tumors had HER2-positive CTCs during the study period. At first follow-up, patients with HER2-positive CTCs had significantly shorter progression-free (n = 6; P = 0.001) and overall (P = 0.013) survival than did patients without HER2-positive CTCs (n = 43) in log-rank analysis. In multivariate analysis, HER2-positive CTCs at first follow-up (P = 0.029) and the number of therapies patients received before this study (P = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors in terms of progression-free survival. The number of therapies (P = 0.001) and a count of ≥5 CTCs (P = 0.043) at baseline were independent prognostic factors in terms of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that HER2 status in CTCs may be a prognostic factor for MBC. Well-powered prospective studies are necessary to determine the potential role of HER2-targeted therapies for patients with HER2-positive CTCs and HER2-negative primary tumors.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Massimo Cristofanilli; Daniel F Hayes; G Thomas Budd; Mathew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; Jeri Matera; W Jeffrey Allard; M Craig Miller; Herbert A Fritsche; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Leon W M M Terstappen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Massimo Cristofanilli; G Thomas Budd; Matthew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; Jeri Matera; M Craig Miller; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; W Jeffrey Allard; Leon W M M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Songdong Meng; Debasish Tripathy; Sanjay Shete; Raheela Ashfaq; Barbara Haley; Steve Perkins; Peter Beitsch; Amanullah Khan; David Euhus; Cynthia Osborne; Eugene Frenkel; Susan Hoover; Marilyn Leitch; Edward Clifford; Ellen Vitetta; Larry Morrison; Dorothee Herlyn; Leon W M M Terstappen; Timothy Fleming; Tanja Fehm; Thomas Tucker; Nancy Lane; Jianqiang Wang; Jonathan Uhr Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-06-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Pia Wülfing; Julia Borchard; Horst Buerger; Stefan Heidl; Kurt S Zänker; Ludwig Kiesel; Burkhard Brandt Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Chun Wang; Zhaomei Mu; Zhong Ye; Zhenchao Zhang; Maysa M Abu-Khalaf; Daniel P Silver; Juan P Palazzo; Geetha Jagannathan; Frederick M Fellin; Saveri Bhattacharya; Rebecca J Jaslow; Theodore N Tsangaris; Adam Berger; Manish Neupane; Terrence P Cescon; AnaMaria Lopez; Kaelan Yao; Weelic Chong; Brian Lu; Ronald E Myers; Lifang Hou; Qiang Wei; Bingshan Li; Massimo Cristofanilli; Hushan Yang Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Stephanie A Kazane; Devin Sok; Edward H Cho; Maria Loressa Uson; Peter Kuhn; Peter G Schultz; Vaughn V Smider Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Chad V Pecot; Farideh Z Bischoff; Julie Ann Mayer; Karina L Wong; Tam Pham; Justin Bottsford-Miller; Rebecca L Stone; Yvonne G Lin; Padmavathi Jaladurgam; Ju Won Roh; Blake W Goodman; William M Merritt; Tony J Pircher; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; Alpa M Nick; Joseph Celestino; Cathy Eng; Lee M Ellis; Michael T Deavers; Anil K Sood Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 39.397