| Literature DB >> 27885248 |
Fan Zou1, Jizhu Li2, Xiaohua Jie2, Xiong Peng2, Ruiqi Fan3, Mengmeng Wang4, Jiangjie Wang3, Zhuoqi Liu3, Hua Li5, Huan Deng4, Xiaohong Yang3, Daya Luo3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The expression of miR-205 is closely related to the occurrence, development, and prognosis of lung cancer and breast cancer. However, studies show that it plays opposite roles in different tumor types. Because the expression and regulation of miR-205 are primarily confined to epigenetic areas, whether genetic variation of miR-205 is related to the occurrence or to the development of tumors has not been reported. The aim of this study was to screen genetic variation of miR-205 gene and to investigate its association with the risk and development of lung and breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Genomic DNA was extracted from cultured tumor cell lines and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded lung and breast tissue samples. Bisulfite Clone Sequencing (BCS) and qRT-PCR were employed to detect the DNA methylation status and gene expression of the miR-205 gene, respectively. Genetic variation of miR-205 and miR-205HG were genotyped with PCR-sequencing method. Immunohistochemical analysis for ER, PR, and HER2 was performed on breast tissue samples. RESULTS These results indicate that the functional association of rs3842530 in miR-205HG and lung cancer might provide a possible explanation for the tissue-dependent function of miR-205 in different tumors. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that the functional association of rs3842530 in miR-205HG and lung cancer might provide a possible explanation for the tissue-dependent function of miR-205 in different tumors.Entities:
Keywords: Breast Neoplasms, Male; Lung Neoplasms; MicroRNAs; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27885248 PMCID: PMC5136367 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.901042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Retrieval of high-throughput expression profiling databases. (A) A schematic showing the association between the expression levels of miR-205 and the prevalence risk of lung and breast cancer; (B) Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrating overall survival for patients according to the expression of miR-205; (C) Kaplan-Meier curve indicating overall survival for patients according to the mutation of miR-205HG.
Figure 2Bisulfite clone sequencing (BCS) analysis of the promoter of the miR-205 gene. (A) Gel electrophoresis of 218 bp amplicons of the promoter of the miR-205 gene and 468 bp cloning products from 10 tumor cell lines; (B) DNA chromatograms illustrating the 5 CG sites in the promoter of miR-205 gene, with unmethylated CGs being converted to TG in T47D cell line and methylated CGs remained to be CG in MDA-MB-231 cell line.
Figure 3Methylation status, expression and sequence variation analysis of miR-205 gene in 10 tumor cell lines. (A) BCS and qRT-PCR were employed to detect the methylation status of the promoter of miR-205 gene and the expression of miR-205 in 10 tumor cell lines; (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis for 247 bp amplicons of miR-205 gene in 10 tumor cell lines.
Figure 4Gene polymorphism analysis of miR-205 and miR-205HG in lung and breast tissue samples. (A) SNPs loci of miR-205HG discovered in lung and breast tissue samples; A 247 bp PCR products covering miR-205 and the fourth exon of miR-205HG from 209,432,095 to 209,432,341 were amplified; (B) DNA chromatograms illustrating the genomic sequence variation of miR-205HG.
Association analysis between rs3842530 genotypes and the risk of lung cancer or breast cancer (P-value: compared with type 13/13 respectively).
| Genotype | Lung | P | Breast | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benign lesion | Cancer | Benign lesion | Cancer | |||
| 9/9 | 68 (51.13%) | 65 (48.87%) | 0.032 | 119 (52.65%) | 107 (47.35%) | 0.657 |
| 9/13 | 69 (52.27%) | 63 (47.73%) | 0.040 | 65 (47.10%) | 73 (52.90%) | 0.921 |
| 13/13 | 16 (76.19%) | 5 (23.81%) | 13 (44.44%) | 14 (55.56%) | ||
Association analysis between rs3842530 genotypes and the clinical characteristics of patients with lung cancer or breast cancer.
| Variables | Lung cancer | P | Breast cancer | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/9 | 9/9 and 9/13 | 9/9 | 9/9 and 9/13 | ||||
| Gender | Male | 37 (61.67%) | 23 (38.33%) | 0.423 | 3 (60.00%) | 2 (40.00%) | 0.781 |
| Female | 7 (50.00%) | 7 (50.00%) | 103 (55.98%) | 81 (44.02%) | |||
| Age | <45 | 2 (66.67%) | 1 (33.33%) | 0.765 | 33 (55.93%) | 26 (44.07%) | 0.943 |
| ≥45 | 40 (56.96%) | 29 (43.04%) | 74 (56.49%) | 57 (43.51%) | |||
| Tumor site | Left | 15 (48.39%) | 16 (51.61%) | 0.100 | 57 (54.81%) | 47 (45.19%) | 0.696 |
| Right | 29 (67.44%) | 14 (32.56%) | 49 (57.65%) | 36 (42.35%) | |||
| Tumor size | ≤3 | 11 (50.00%) | 11 (50.00%) | 0.200 | 22 (56.41%) | 17 (43.59%) | 0.990 |
| >3 | 33 (66.00%) | 17 (34.00%) | 85 (56.29%) | 66 (43.71%) | |||
| Clinical stage | I+II | 23 (63.89%) | 13 (36.11%) | 0.471 | ND | ND | ND |
| III+IV | 20 (55.56%) | 16 (44.44%) | ND | ND | |||
| Lymphatic metastasis | No | 22 (52.38%) | 20 (47.62%) | 0.178 | 39 (53.42%) | 34 (46.58%) | 0.427 |
| Yes | 23 (67.65%) | 11 (32.35%) | 49 (59.76%) | 33 (40.24%) | |||
| ER expression | Low | ND | ND | ND | 60 (52.17%) | 55 (47.83%) | 0.074 |
| High | ND | ND | 41 (66.13%) | 21 (33.87%) | |||
| PR expression | Low | ND | ND | ND | 61 (54.95%) | 50 (45.05%) | 0.463 |
| High | ND | ND | 40 (60.61%) | 26 (39.39%) | |||
| HER-2 expression | Low | ND | ND | ND | 57 (54.81%) | 47 (45.19%) | 0.402 |
| High | ND | ND | 47 (61.04%) | 30 (38.96%) | |||
ND – not determined.