BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that the level of circulating tumor cells can predict survival in metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter study, we tested 177 patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer for levels of circulating tumor cells both before the patients were to start a new line of treatment and at the first follow-up visit. The progression of the disease or the response to treatment was determined with the use of standard imaging studies at the participating centers. RESULTS: Outcomes were assessed according to levels of circulating tumor cells at baseline, before the patients started a new treatment for metastatic disease. Patients in a training set with levels of circulating tumor cells equal to or higher than 5 per 7.5 ml of whole blood, as compared with the group with fewer than 5 circulating tumor cells per 7.5 ml, had a shorter median progression-free survival (2.7 months vs. 7.0 months, P<0.001) and shorter overall survival (10.1 months vs. >18 months, P<0.001). At the first follow-up visit after the initiation of therapy, this difference between the groups persisted (progression-free survival, 2.1 months vs. 7.0 months; P<0.001; overall survival, 8.2 months vs. >18 months; P<0.001), and the reduced proportion of patients (from 49 percent to 30 percent) in the group with an unfavorable prognosis suggested that there was a benefit from therapy. The multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression showed that, of all the variables in the statistical model, the levels of circulating tumor cells at baseline and at the first follow-up visit were the most significant predictors of progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The number of circulating tumor cells before treatment is an independent predictor of progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that the level of circulating tumor cells can predict survival in metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter study, we tested 177 patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer for levels of circulating tumor cells both before the patients were to start a new line of treatment and at the first follow-up visit. The progression of the disease or the response to treatment was determined with the use of standard imaging studies at the participating centers. RESULTS: Outcomes were assessed according to levels of circulating tumor cells at baseline, before the patients started a new treatment for metastatic disease. Patients in a training set with levels of circulating tumor cells equal to or higher than 5 per 7.5 ml of whole blood, as compared with the group with fewer than 5 circulating tumor cells per 7.5 ml, had a shorter median progression-free survival (2.7 months vs. 7.0 months, P<0.001) and shorter overall survival (10.1 months vs. >18 months, P<0.001). At the first follow-up visit after the initiation of therapy, this difference between the groups persisted (progression-free survival, 2.1 months vs. 7.0 months; P<0.001; overall survival, 8.2 months vs. >18 months; P<0.001), and the reduced proportion of patients (from 49 percent to 30 percent) in the group with an unfavorable prognosis suggested that there was a benefit from therapy. The multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression showed that, of all the variables in the statistical model, the levels of circulating tumor cells at baseline and at the first follow-up visit were the most significant predictors of progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The number of circulating tumor cells before treatment is an independent predictor of progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: Lisa A Carey; Hope S Rugo; P Kelly Marcom; Erica L Mayer; Francisco J Esteva; Cynthia X Ma; Minetta C Liu; Anna Maria Storniolo; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Andres Forero-Torres; Antonio C Wolff; Timothy J Hobday; Anastasia Ivanova; Wing-Keung Chiu; Madlyn Ferraro; Emily Burrows; Philip S Bernard; Katherine A Hoadley; Charles M Perou; Eric P Winer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jian Yu Xu; Beverly Handy; Christina L Michaelis; Steven G Waguespack; Mimi I Hu; Naifa Busaidy; Camilo Jimenez; Maria E Cabanillas; Herbert A Fritsche; Gilbert J Cote; Steven I Sherman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Pauliina Helo; Angel M Cronin; Daniel C Danila; Sven Wenske; Rita Gonzalez-Espinoza; Aseem Anand; Michael Koscuiszka; Riina-Minna Väänänen; Kim Pettersson; Felix K-H Chun; Thomas Steuber; Hartwig Huland; Bertrand D Guillonneau; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Martin Fleisher; Howard I Scher; Hans Lilja Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 8.327