Literature DB >> 28983495

Effect of fatigue on reading computed tomography examination of the multiply injured patient.

Elizabeth A Krupinski1, Kevin M Schartz2, Mark S Van Tassell2, Mark T Madsen2, Robert T Caldwell2, Kevin S Berbaum2.   

Abstract

Our goal was to ascertain how fatigue affects performance in reading computed tomography (CT) examinations of patients with multiple injuries. CT images with multiple fractures from a previous study of satisfaction of search (SOS) were read by radiologists after a day of clinical work. Performance in this study with fatigued readers was compared to a previous study in which readers were not fatigued. Detection accuracy for obvious injuries was not affected by fatigue, but accuracy for subtle fractures was reduced ([Formula: see text]). An SOS effect on decision thresholds was evident mirroring recent studies. Without fatigue, readers spent more time interpreting and reporting findings as the number of the injuries increased. When fatigued, readers did not increase reading time as fracture number increased. Without fractures, reading time for not-fatigued and fatigued readers was the same ([Formula: see text]) but was significant ([Formula: see text]) with an added subtle fracture. The difference increased with a major injury ([Formula: see text]) and increased further with both a major injury and subtle fracture ([Formula: see text]). Fatigue and multiple abnormalities have independent effects on detection performance but do interact in determining search time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  errors; fatigue; interpretation time; satisfaction of search

Year:  2017        PMID: 28983495      PMCID: PMC5621368          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.035504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  19 in total

1.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  After-Hours Radiology: Challenges and Strategies for the Radiologist.

Authors:  Saurabh Rohatgi; Tarek N Hanna; Clint W Sliker; Robert M Abbott; Refky Nicola
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Measuring observer performance in chest radiology: some experiences.

Authors:  E James Potchen
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Time course of satisfaction of search.

Authors:  K S Berbaum; E A Franken; D D Dorfman; S A Rooholamini; C E Coffman; S H Cornell; A H Cragg; J R Galvin; H Honda; S C Kao
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  The Influence of a Vocalized Checklist on Detection of Multiple Abnormalities in Chest Radiography.

Authors:  Kevin S Berbaum; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin M Schartz; Robert T Caldwell; Mark T Madsen; Seung Hur; Archana T Laroia; Brad H Thompson; Brian F Mullan; Edmund A Franken
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  The Impact of Fatigue on Satisfaction of Search in Chest Radiography.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum; Kevin M Schartz; Robert T Caldwell; Mark T Madsen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Satisfaction of Search in Chest Radiography 2015.

Authors:  Kevin S Berbaum; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin M Schartz; Robert T Caldwell; Mark T Madsen; Seung Hur; Archana T Laroia; Brad H Thompson; Brian F Mullan; Edmund A Franken
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Satisfaction of search from detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography of the chest.

Authors:  Kevin S Berbaum; Kevin M Schartz; Robert T Caldwell; Mark T Madsen; Brad H Thompson; Brian F Mullan; Andrew N Ellingson; Edmund A Franken
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Tired in the Reading Room: The Influence of Fatigue in Radiology.

Authors:  Stephen Waite; Srinivas Kolla; Jean Jeudy; Alan Legasto; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Deborah L Reede
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.532

View more
  3 in total

1.  Increasing display luminance as a means to enhance interpretation accuracy and efficiency when reducing full-field digital mammography dose.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-07-27

Review 2.  Fatigue in radiology: a fertile area for future research.

Authors:  Sian Taylor-Phillips; Chris Stinton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Detection of missed fractures of hand and forearm in whole-body CT in a blinded reassessment.

Authors:  S Kim; L Goelz; F Münn; D Kim; M Millrose; A Eisenschenk; S Thelen; M Lautenbach
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.