Literature DB >> 30065950

Increasing display luminance as a means to enhance interpretation accuracy and efficiency when reducing full-field digital mammography dose.

Elizabeth A Krupinski1.   

Abstract

Reducing dose increases noise impacting image quality but can be offset by increasing display luminance. Two contrast detail mammography images were obtained at 26 kV and the same distance between detectors, at 45 and 50 mAs resulting in entrance surface doses of 7.09 and 7.88 mGy, respectively. They were processed to make average gray level of the background independent of the dose level while maintaining original SNR. Eight radiologists viewed the images at 420, 1000  cd/m2 , and SpotView™ a tool that resulted in an average display luminance of 3138.8  cd/m2 . Percent correct (PC) for all three luminances was higher for high versus low dose. Performance was always higher with high dose no matter what the luminance. For low dose, PC was highest with SpotView™, and SpotView™ and 1000  cd/m2 were significantly higher than 420  cd/m2 . At high dose, SpotView™ PC was significantly higher than both lower luminances. Average time per image was lower in high dose, and, at both doses, time decreased as luminance increased, with SpotView™ having significantly shorter times. Increasing luminance from 420 to 1000  cd/m2 significantly increases target detection by ∼3.0% and with SpotView™ by ∼6.2% . Increasing display luminance with SpotView™ significantly decreases reading time by 16.0%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; display luminance; efficiency; full-field digital mammography; observer performance

Year:  2018        PMID: 30065950      PMCID: PMC6063132          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.035501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  20 in total

1.  Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.

Authors:  J M Herron; T M Bender; W L Campbell; J H Sumkin; H E Rockette; D Gur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.

Authors:  Jin Mo Goo; Ja-Young Choi; Jung-Gi Im; Hyun Ju Lee; Myung Jin Chung; Daehee Han; Seong Ho Park; Jong Hyo Kim; Sang-Hee Nam
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  The insidious problem of fatigue in medical imaging practice.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection.

Authors:  A Fischmann; K C Siegmann; A Wersebe; C D Claussen; M Müller-Schimpfle
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Margarita Zuley; Janet K Baum; Helga S Marques
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Patients' Perceptions of Radiation Exposure Associated With Mammography.

Authors:  Jacqueline Hollada; William Speier; Thomas Oshiro; Roslynn Marzan-McGill; Stefan G Ruehm; Lawrence W Bassett; Colin Wells
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Computer vision syndrome: a review.

Authors:  Clayton Blehm; Seema Vishnu; Ashbala Khattak; Shrabanee Mitra; Richard W Yee
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Measurement of visual strain in radiologists.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 9.  Tired in the Reading Room: The Influence of Fatigue in Radiology.

Authors:  Stephen Waite; Srinivas Kolla; Jean Jeudy; Alan Legasto; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Deborah L Reede
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Effect of fatigue on reading computed tomography examination of the multiply injured patient.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin M Schartz; Mark S Van Tassell; Mark T Madsen; Robert T Caldwell; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.