RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We tested whether satisfaction of search (SOS) effects that occur in computed tomography (CT) examination of the chest on detection of native abnormalities are produced by the addition of simulated pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, 70 CT examinations, half that demonstrated diverse, subtle abnormalities and half that demonstrated no native lesions, were read by 18 radiology residents and fellows under two experimental conditions: presented with and without pulmonary nodules. In a second experiment, many of the examinations were replaced to include more salient native abnormalities. This set was read by 14 additional radiology residents and fellows. In both experiments, detection of the natural abnormalities was studied. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas for each reader-treatment combination were estimated using empirical and proper ROC models. Additional analyses focused on decision thresholds and visual search time on abnormality-free CT slice ranges. Institutional review board approval and informed consent from 32 participants were obtained. RESULTS: Observers more often missed diverse native abnormalities when pulmonary nodules were added, but also made fewer false-positive responses. There was no change in ROC area, but decision criteria grew more conservative. The SOS effect on decision thresholds was accompanied by a reduction in search time on abnormality-free CT slice ranges. CONCLUSION: The SOS effect in CT examination of the chest is similar to that found in contrast examination of the abdomen, involving induced visual neglect.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We tested whether satisfaction of search (SOS) effects that occur in computed tomography (CT) examination of the chest on detection of native abnormalities are produced by the addition of simulated pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, 70 CT examinations, half that demonstrated diverse, subtle abnormalities and half that demonstrated no native lesions, were read by 18 radiology residents and fellows under two experimental conditions: presented with and without pulmonary nodules. In a second experiment, many of the examinations were replaced to include more salient native abnormalities. This set was read by 14 additional radiology residents and fellows. In both experiments, detection of the natural abnormalities was studied. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas for each reader-treatment combination were estimated using empirical and proper ROC models. Additional analyses focused on decision thresholds and visual search time on abnormality-free CT slice ranges. Institutional review board approval and informed consent from 32 participants were obtained. RESULTS: Observers more often missed diverse native abnormalities when pulmonary nodules were added, but also made fewer false-positive responses. There was no change in ROC area, but decision criteria grew more conservative. The SOS effect on decision thresholds was accompanied by a reduction in search time on abnormality-free CT slice ranges. CONCLUSION: The SOS effect in CT examination of the chest is similar to that found in contrast examination of the abdomen, involving induced visual neglect.
Authors: K S Berbaum; E A Franken; D D Dorfman; E M Miller; R T Caldwell; D M Kuehn; M L Berbaum Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: K S Berbaum; E A Franken; D D Dorfman; E M Miller; E A Krupinski; K Kreinbring; R T Caldwell; C H Lu Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: R Kakinuma; H Ohmatsu; M Kaneko; K Eguchi; T Naruke; K Nagai; Y Nishiwaki; A Suzuki; N Moriyama Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Annemilia Del Ciello; Paola Franchi; Andrea Contegiacomo; Giuseppe Cicchetti; Lorenzo Bonomo; Anna Rita Larici Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2017 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Kevin S Berbaum; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin M Schartz; Robert T Caldwell; Mark T Madsen; Seung Hur; Archana T Laroia; Brad H Thompson; Brian F Mullan; Edmund A Franken Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin M Schartz; Mark S Van Tassell; Mark T Madsen; Robert T Caldwell; Kevin S Berbaum Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2017-09-29