Literature DB >> 1885270

Time course of satisfaction of search.

K S Berbaum1, E A Franken, D D Dorfman, S A Rooholamini, C E Coffman, S H Cornell, A H Cragg, J R Galvin, H Honda, S C Kao.   

Abstract

"Satisfaction of search" (SOS) refers to the effect in which a second lesion remains undetected after detection of another lesion on the same radiograph. The objective of this study was to clarify our understanding of SOS by relating it to total time of inspection and time intervals before, between, and after discovery of lesions. Detection accuracy of native lesions in chest radiographs, before and after the addition of a simulated nodular lesion, was measured for ten observers. Analysis of data from this and a previous experiment showed that average perceptual accuracy of individual receiver operating characteristic curves was significantly reduced with the addition of the nodules. Plots and analyses of search time revealed that, on average, during a typical 46-second inspection of a case, simulated nodules were found at 18 seconds, native abnormalities at 25 seconds, and false positives occurred at 33 seconds. Time needed to find nodules did not depend on whether native lesions were present; time to find native lesions did not change with addition of nodules; and total search time was the same for images with one, two, or no lesions. The detection results show that the SOS effect was obtained, but that interrupting search in order to measure it also diminishes accuracy. Analysis of the time course data relates SOS to perceptual capture and strategic halting of search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1885270     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199107000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  14 in total

1.  Does computer-aided diagnosis for lung tumors change satisfaction of search in chest radiography?

Authors:  Kevin S Berbaum; Robert T Caldwell; Kevin M Schartz; Brad H Thompson; E A Franken
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Satisfaction in motion: Subsequent search misses are more likely in moving search displays.

Authors:  Cary Stothart; Andrew Clement; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

3.  Visual search in breast imaging.

Authors:  Ziba Gandomkar; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The Impact of Fatigue on Satisfaction of Search in Chest Radiography.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum; Kevin M Schartz; Robert T Caldwell; Mark T Madsen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Satisfaction of Search in Chest Radiography 2015.

Authors:  Kevin S Berbaum; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin M Schartz; Robert T Caldwell; Mark T Madsen; Seung Hur; Archana T Laroia; Brad H Thompson; Brian F Mullan; Edmund A Franken
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Satisfaction of search from detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography of the chest.

Authors:  Kevin S Berbaum; Kevin M Schartz; Robert T Caldwell; Mark T Madsen; Brad H Thompson; Brian F Mullan; Andrew N Ellingson; Edmund A Franken
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Effect of fatigue on reading computed tomography examination of the multiply injured patient.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin M Schartz; Mark S Van Tassell; Mark T Madsen; Robert T Caldwell; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-09-29

8.  Categorical cuing: Object categories structure the acquisition of statistical regularities to guide visual search.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Ariel M Kershner; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-04-08

Review 9.  Use-inspired basic research in medical image perception.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-14

10.  How did I miss that? Developing mixed hybrid visual search as a 'model system' for incidental finding errors in radiology.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Abla Alaoui Soce; Hayden M Schill
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.