| Literature DB >> 28975915 |
Gagandeep Kaur1, Maya Saba2, Craig L Phillips3, Keith Wong4, Bandana Saini5.
Abstract
Chronotherapy involves altering the timing of medication administration in coordination with the body's circadian rhythms to improve the overall control of disease and to minimise treatment side effects. Training on chronotherapy requires students to map different topics learnt in earlier years of their professional degree and apply these concepts clinically. This requires strategic educational design. Therefore, the aim of the study was to develop, implement and evaluate an educational intervention focusing on the application of chronotherapy for final-year undergraduate pharmacy students. An educational intervention utilizing multiple learning strategies for enhancing chronotherapy related awareness was designed and implemented in the final year undergraduate pharmacy cohort at the University of Sydney Australia (2013). A custom-designed questionnaire measuring awareness about (13 items scored 0 or 1), and attitudes (12 items scored on a Likert scale of 1-5) towards chronotherapy was administered pre and post intervention to evaluate its impact. The pre-intervention mean total awareness and attitude scores were 6.5 ± 2.0 (score range 0-13) and 47.4 ± 6.9 (score range 12-60) respectively. The mean total post-intervention scores were significantly higher for total awareness (10.1 ± 1.9) and attitude (54.0 ± 6.0). Carefully designed educational interventions utilising pedagogic principles for pharmacy students can improve awareness of and enhance positive attitudes toward pharmacists' roles in optimizing drug therapy using chronotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: chronotherapy; circadian rhythms; education; intervention; pharmacy students; work shop
Year: 2015 PMID: 28975915 PMCID: PMC5597106 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy3040269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacy (Basel) ISSN: 2226-4787
The content of the utilized questionnaire.
| Section | Questionnaire Section | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | General Demographics and Information Section | 9 items that included statements with Yes/No answers and short questions covering demographic and general data about the students’ work experience and information on the chronotherapy. |
| 2 | Awareness Section | 13 items that included brief statements or clinical case studies with multiple-choice response options. The possible score for each item was either 0 or 1. The total possible score range for the section was 0–13. |
| 3 | Attitude Section | 12 items that included statements with multiple options covering attitudes and willingness to use principles of chronotherapy. Each item was measured using the Likert scale of “Strongly Agree”, “Somewhat Agree”, “Neither Agree Nor Disagree”, “Somewhat Disagree”, and “Strongly Disagree”. The possible score range for each item was 1 to 5. The total possible score range for the section was 12–60. |
Learning objectives and alignment with instruction and assessment plans.
| Learning Objectives | Instructional Strategies | Type of Learning ( | Assessment Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Define the key terms used in the field of circadian rhythms and chronotherapy. | Knowledge transfer through the delivery of a didactic lecture. Provision of references to background articles in the workshop | Factual knowledge/Remembering | Performance in post-workshop questionnaire and exam questions |
| Understand the significance of circadian rhythms in various disease conditions | Delivery of the lecture. Screening of a BBC documentary and a few research articles as background references in the workshop | Comprehension | Discussion towards the end of the lecture and workshop. Performance in post-workshop questionnaire and exam questions |
| Apply the scientific rationale behind the timing of administration of medicine | Delivery of a lecture. Screening of a BBC documentary and a few research articles as background references in the workshop. Discussion of case studies and role-play during the workshop | Comprehension | Assessing the quality of case discussion, |
| Demonstrate an understanding of different aspects of chronotherapy in terms of pharmacokinetics, dynamics, formulation and effectiveness | Delivery of a lecture. Provision of in-depth information on various aspects of chronotherapy. Discussion of case studies during the workshop | Application, Analysis, and Synthesis | Assessing the quality of case discussion, |
| Compare the limitations and benefits of chronotherapy applications in clinical practice | Delivery of a lecture. Provision of in-depth information on different aspects of chronotherapy. Discussion of case studies, poster-making and role-play during the workshop | Analysis | Observation and analysis of case studies, poster and role-play. Peer critique, followed by group discussion. |
| Justify the role of pharmacists in implementing principles of chronotherapy and optimize drug therapy. | Discussion of case studies, role-play and poster making | Analysis, Evaluation, and Skill Acquisition | Observation and analysis of case studies, poster and role-play. Peer critique, followed by group discussion |
The content of the workshop.
| Activity (Time Allotted for the Activities) a | Objective | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Video screening of a BBC documentary (30 min) | Introducing the audio-visual support for scaffolding clinical learning | BBC documentary: “Horizon - The Secret life of your biological clock” was screened. The documentary explained how the human biological clock works and how it affects and controls routine life activities. The video helped grasp students’ interest and engagement in the topic through the visualization of real-life scenarios. |
| Clinical case studies and poster making (100 min: 40 min for solving the cases and 60 min for class discussion) | Clinical concept learning-collaborative learning, critical thinking, and generating a new idea in a team environment. | Clinical case studies related to circadian rhythms and chronotherapy principles that could be encountered in future practice were provided to each group. During the first 40-min, each group was asked to read, discuss, and analyze their case. The key clinical query was to determine an appropriate time for administering the medication in question. Students in each station were then asked to design a single poster addressing awareness of chronotherapy with their patients. Then 60 min were allocated for class discussion of the case studies. The case studies were presented using multimedia screen and read out by corresponding students from each station. Discussions covered issues such as counseling patients about the right time of administration, explaining to patients about the circadian variability in symptoms of disease conditions in lay language, and differences between conventional drug delivery systems and chronotherapeutic drug delivery systems. Each station displayed their poster on a multimedia screen, and an instructor-led the discussion. This activity was engaging and collated various ideas whilst providing learners with a creative outlet. The instructor guided the discussion by asking questions and answering queries from the students. All groups were encouraged to take part in the debate and provide input. |
| Role Play (10 min) | Collaborative learning-Practicing acquired knowledge. | A group of students role-played the “patient”, the “pharmacist” and observer from clinical case studies. In the role play, the “pharmacist” counsels the “patient” regarding the “right time” of administration of medicines and promoting chronotherapy application in pharmacy. |
| Debriefing (10 min) | Solidifying learning concepts, synthesizing new knowledge | The instructor initiated the discussion by summarizing key points covered in the lecture and throughout the workshop focusing on variability in circadian rhythms and timing of medication administration. |
Note: () 10 min were allotted at the beginning for the introduction and a brief description of the workshop; 20 min at the end of the workshop was reserved for the assessment.
Examples of clinical case studies in the workshop.
| Case Studies | Clinical Expertise Tested |
|---|---|
| Counseling for administration (right time of administration), lifestyle modification, contraindications, precautions, and storage | |
| Counseling for administration (right time of administration), lifestyle modification, contraindications, precautions, and storage. | |
| Counseling for administration (right time of administration), lifestyle modification, contraindications, precautions, and storage. | |
| Addressing patients’ concerns, therapy selection/counseling, lifestyle modifications. | |
| Addressing patients’ concerns, therapy selection/counseling, lifestyle modifications. | |
| Counseling for administration (right time of administration, how to take the medication), lifestyle modification, contraindications, precautions, and storage. | |
| Counseling for administration (right time of administration), lifestyle modification, contraindications, precautions, and storage. |
Result of the feedback evaluation.
| Feedback | Mean (SD) * |
|---|---|
| The workshop meets the stated learning objective. | 2.1 (1.4) |
| The supporting materials used in the workshop (video, reference materials, PowerPoint template) were useful, and they enhance my learning experience. | 2.1 (1.4) |
| The instructors used appropriate teaching techniques to enhance my learning. | 1.8 (1.4) |
| Overall, the workshop was relevant and useful for my future practice. | 2.1 (1.5) |
Note: * The score was based on a Likert scale from 1–5, where 1 is strongly agree, and 5 is strongly disagree.