Literature DB >> 28964050

Speech recognition error patterns for steady-state noise and interrupted speech.

Kimberly G Smith1, Daniel Fogerty2.   

Abstract

Listening in various types of adverse listening conditions may lead to different errors in speech recognition. Young adults repeated sentences degraded by steady-state noise or periodically interrupted by noise preserved at varying proportions. Recognition errors were analyzed according to the noise type and speech proportion. Across noise types, as word recognition decreased, the occurrence of phonemic substitutions and whole word omissions increased. Listeners made more whole word omission and substitution errors during steady-state noise. Part word errors occurred most frequently when listening to speech presented in steady-state noise or interrupted by noise with the smallest speech proportion preserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28964050      PMCID: PMC5724738          DOI: 10.1121/1.5003916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Jana Besser; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Jerker Rönnberg; Joost M Festen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Sources of variability in consonant perception of normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Johannes Zaar; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  The cortical organization of speech processing.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise.

Authors:  Sandeep A Phatak; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Microscopic prediction of speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing in noise using an auditory model.

Authors:  Tim Jürgens; Thomas Brand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for Spanish.

Authors:  Máté Attila Tóth; María Luisa García Lecumberri; Yan Tang; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.

Authors:  G S Dell; M F Schwartz; N Martin; E M Saffran; D A Gagnon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  7 in total

1.  Error patterns of native and non-native listeners' perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Older adult recognition error patterns when listening to interrupted speech and speech in steady-state noise.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Blythe Vickery; Daniel Fogerty; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Impact of depression on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Christopher G Beevers; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perception of Tamil Mono-Syllabic and Bi-Syllabic Words in Multi-Talker Speech Babble by Young Adults with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sasirekha Gnanasekar; Ramya Vaidyanath
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2019-06-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.