| Literature DB >> 28962260 |
J A Holme1, H E Nyvold1, V Tat2, V M Arlt3, A Bhargava2, K B Gutzkow1, A Solhaug4, M Låg1, R Becher1, P E Schwarze1, K Ask2, L Ekeren1, J Øvrevik1.
Abstract
This study explores and characterizes the toxicity of two closely related carcinogenic dinitro-pyrenes (DNPs), 1,3-DNP and 1,8-DNP, in human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells and mouse hepatoma Hepa1c1c7 cells. Neither 1,3-DNP nor 1,8-DNP (3-30 μM) induced cell death in BEAS-2B cells. In Hepa1c1c7 cells only 1,3-DNP (10-30 μM) induced a mixture of apoptotic and necrotic cell death after 24 h. Both compounds increased the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in BEAS-2B as measured by CM-H2DCFDA-fluorescence. A corresponding increase in oxidative damage to DNA was revealed by the formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (fpg)-modified comet assay. Without fpg, DNP-induced DNA damage detected by the comet assay was only found in Hepa1c1c7 cells. Only 1,8-DNP formed DNA adduct measured by 32P-postlabelling. In Hepa1c1c cells, 1,8-DNP induced phosphorylation of H2AX (γH2AX) and p53 at a lower concentration than 1,3-DNP and there was no direct correlation between DNA damage/DNA damage response (DR) and induced cytotoxicity. On the other hand, 1,3-DNP-induced apoptosis was inhibited by pifithrin-α, an inhibitor of p53 transcriptional activity. Furthermore, 1,3-DNP triggered an unfolded protein response (UPR), as measured by an increased expression of CHOP, ATF4 and XBP1. Thus, other types of damage possibly linked to endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-stress and/or UPR could be involved in the induced apoptosis. Our results suggest that the stronger carcinogenic potency of 1,8-DNP compared to 1,3-DNP is linked to its higher genotoxic effects. This in combination with its lower potency to induce cell death may increase the probability of causing mutations.Entities:
Keywords: 1,3-DNP, 1,3-dinitropyrene; 1,3-Dinitropyrene; 1,8-DNP, 1,8-dinitropyrene; 1,8-Dinitropyrene; 1-NP, 1-nitropyrene; 3-NBA, 3-nitrobenzanthrone; AhR, aromatic hydrocarbon receptor; Apoptosis; B[a]P, benzo[a]pyrene; CM-H2DCFDA or H2DCFDA, 5-(and 6-)chloromethyl-2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; CYP, cytochrome P450; Chk, checkpoint kinases; DDR, DNA damage response; DHE, dihydroethidium; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; DNA damage; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; Hoechst 33258, 2(2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6-benzimidazole-6-(1-methyl-4-piperazyl)benzimidazole hydrochloride); Hoechst 33342, 2′-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-2′,5′-bis-1H-benzimidazole hydrochloride); NR, nitro-reductasesnitro-PAHnitro substituted-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; Nitro-PAHs; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; PFT, pifithrin; PI, propidium iodide; PM, particular matter; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SSB, single strand breaks; UPR, unfolded protein response; fpg, formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase; zVAD-FMK, benzyolcarbonayl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethyl ketone; γH2AX, phosphorylated H2AX
Year: 2014 PMID: 28962260 PMCID: PMC4547165 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.07.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1Chemical structures of the test compounds.
Fig. 2Cell death determined by fluorescence microscopy. BEAS-2B or Hepa1c1c7 cells were exposed to various concentrations of 1,3-DNP, 1,8-DNP or DMSO (control) for up to 72 h. Cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide (PI), and subsequently analyzed for apoptosis (Ap) (including apoptotic necrotic) and necrosis (Nec) using fluorescence microscopy. The third columns in the graphs are the sums of the two first. Data presents the mean ± SEM of at least 3 independent experiments. * Significantly different from DMSO-treated controls (p < 0.05).
Fig. 3Effects of 1,3-DNP and 1,8-DNP apoptosis on cell cycle distribution. Hepa1c1c7 cells were exposed to various concentrations of 1,3-DNP, 1,8-DNP, or DMSO (control) for 24 h. (A) Levels of PARP and caspase 3 were analyzed by Western blotting (shown is one representative experiment out of three separate incubations). (B) Hepa1c1c7 cells were pre-treated for 1 h with zVAD-FMK (20 μM) followed by co-exposure with 1,3-DNP (30 μM) or DMSO (control) for 24 h. Percentage of cell death was estimated by fluorescence microscopy counts. Data presents the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. * Significantly different from DMSO-treated controls (p < 0.05). #Significantly different from treatments without zVAD-FMK (p < 0.05). (C) Hepa1c1c7 cells were exposed to various concentrations of 1,3-DNP, 1,8-DNP or DMSO (control) for 24 h. Cells were stained with Hoechst 33258 and the cell cycle distribution was measured by flow cytometer. Data is presented as the relative proportions of cells (%) in the different cell cycle phases. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. *Significantly different from DMSO-treated controls (p < 0.05).
Fig. 4ROS as determined by H2DCFDA-fluorescence. BEAS-2B or Hepa1c1c7 cells were exposed to various concentrations of 1,3-DNP, 1,8-DNP, or DMSO (control) for 2 or 24 h. During the last 2 h CM-H2DCFDA (H2D in figure) was added. After exposure cells were analyzed by flow cytometer (see also Supplementary Fig. 1). Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. *Significantly different from DMSO-treated controls (p < 0.05).
Fig. 5ROS as determined by DHE-fluorescence. BEAS-2B or Hepa1c1c7 cells were exposed to various concentrations of 1,3-DNP or 1,8-DNP, or DMSO (control) for 2 or 24 h. During the last 2 h DHE was added. After exposure cells were analyzed by flow cytometer (see also Supplementary Fig. 2). Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. *Significantly different from DMSO-treated controls (p < 0.05).
Fig. 6DNA damage measured by the comet assay and DNA adduct formation assessed by 32P-postlabelling. BEAS-2B (A, C) and Hepa1c1c7 (B) cells were exposed to 1, 3, 10 or 30 μM of 1,3-DNP, 1,8-DNP, B[a]P (15 μM) or DMSO (control) for 24 h. DNA strand breaks were measured by the comet assay (without fpg), and oxidative damage to DNA was determined using the fpg-modified comet assay (A and B). Data (% tail DNA) represents the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. (C and D) DNA adduct formation (RAL, relative adduct labeling) in BEAS-2B was measured by 32P-postlabelling assay. ND, not detectable.
Fig. 7The effect on DNA damage response. BEAS-2B (A) and Hepa1c1c7 cells (B) were exposed to various concentrations of 1,3-DNP, 1,8-DNP or DMSO for 24 h and levels of H2AX, phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AX) and p53 were analyzed by Western blotting (semi quantification are given as numbers above the blots). Results from one representative of three separate experiments are presented.
Fig. 8Effects of p53 inhibitors on 1,3-DNP induced cell death. Hepa1c1c7 cells were exposed to 10 μM 1,3-DNP for 24 h with or without pre-incubation for 1 h with 20 μM pifithrin-α (PFT-α, A) or PFT-μ (B). Control cells were treated with DMSO only. Cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide (PI), and subsequently analyzed for apoptosis (Ap) (including apoptotic necrotic) and necrosis (Nec) using fluorescence microscopy. *Significantly different from DMSO-treated controls. #Significantly different from treatment without inhibitor (p < 0.05).
Fig. 9Effects on protein unfolding response (UPR). Hepa1c1c7 cells were exposed to 10 μM 1,3-DNP or 1,8-DNP for 6 h and gene expression was measured by NanoString's nCounter technology. A heat map showing fold changes for the 1,3-DNP and 1,8-DNP cells (A). Each column represents an individual cell culture sample. Changes in gene expression were calculated using the log2-transformed fold ratios between each experimental sample and the mean of the controls. Hierarchical clustering was performed using Euclidian distance and average linkage. A histogram demonstrating the log2-fold ratios for selected UPR genes and IL-6 (B). Each bar represents the mean fold change ± SEM of three replicates for each treatment condition. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. DMSO-treated controls.