| Literature DB >> 23865044 |
Abderrahim Nemmar1, Jørn A Holme, Irma Rosas, Per E Schwarze, Ernesto Alfaro-Moreno.
Abstract
Epidemiological and clinical studies have linked exposure to particulate matter (PM) to adverse health effects, which may be registered as increased mortality and morbidity from various cardiopulmonary diseases. Despite the evidence relating PM to health effects, the physiological, cellular, and molecular mechanisms causing such effects are still not fully characterized. Two main approaches are used to elucidate the mechanisms of toxicity. One is the use of in vivo experimental models, where various effects of PM on respiratory, cardiovascular, and nervous systems can be evaluated. To more closely examine the molecular and cellular mechanisms behind the different physiological effects, the use of various in vitro models has proven to be valuable. In the present review, we discuss the current advances on the toxicology of particulate matter and nanoparticles based on these techniques.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23865044 PMCID: PMC3705851 DOI: 10.1155/2013/279371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Schematization of the size and main target for particulate matter and nanoparticles.
Comparison of the WHO guidelines and standards from different countries. Modified from WHO air quality guidelines, global update, 2005, a report on a Working Group meeting, Bonn, Germany, 18–20 October 2005 [5].
| Selected air quality guidelines and standards | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source |
PM10 ( | PM2.5 ( | ||
| 1 year | 24 hours | 1 year | 24 hours | |
| WHO [ | 20 | 50 | 10 | 25 |
| European Union | 40 | 50 | 25 | |
| United States | 50 | 150 | 12 | 35 |
| California | 20 | 50 | 15 | 65 |
| Japan | 100 | 12 | 65 | |
| Brazil | 50 | 150 | ||
| Mexico | 50 | 120 | 15 | 65 |
| South Africa | 60 | 180 | 15 | 65 |
| India (sensitive populations/ | 50/60/120 | |||
| China | 40/100/150 | 50/150/250 | 35 | |
Figure 2Schematization of the main acute, subacute, and chronic effects induced by inhaled particles and nanoparticles. In the acute side it is interesting to highlight that a high-caloric- and fat-rich diet provides a scenario facilitating proinflammatory effects of particles. Also, Tnymoquinone, eugenol, simstatin, and lovastin have a protective effect in vivo. In the subacute and chronic side, it is interesting to highlight the presence of tissue alterations, lung infiltration by T cells, and increases in the risk of COPD.
Figure 3Summary of the main systemic effects associated with particle exposure and the possible mechanisms related to those effects.
In vitro evidence that supports and provides plausible mechanisms for the in vivo observed effects induced by PM and NP.
|
| |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Oxidative stress | ROS increases via NADPH-oxidase |
| Local and systemic inflammation | Secretion of IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, TNFa, |
| Hyperplasia | Proliferative stimuli induced by |
| COPD | Increased cytotoxicity on exposed |
| Systemic and endothelial dysfunction | Endothelial cell activation by direct |
| Particle translocation | Changes in the TEER values related |