| Literature DB >> 28955979 |
A P Wagner1, S Chinnathambi1, I R Titze2,3, E A Sander1.
Abstract
The tissues of the body are routinely subjected to various forms of mechanical vibration, the frequency, amplitude, and duration of which can contribute both positively and negatively to human health. The vocal cords, which are in close proximity to the thyroid, may also supply the thyroid with important mechanical signals that modulate hormone production via mechanical vibrations from phonation. In order to explore the possibility that vibrational stimulation from vocalization can enhance thyroid epithelial cell function, FRTL-5 rat thyroid cells were subjected to either chemical stimulation with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), mechanical stimulation with physiological vibrations, or a combination of the two, all in a well-characterized, torsional rheometer-bioreactor. The FRTL-5 cells responded to mechanical stimulation with significantly (p<0.05) increased metabolic activity, significantly (p<0.05) increased ROS production, and increased gene expression of thyroglobulin and sodium-iodide symporter compared to un-stimulated controls, and showed an equivalent or greater response than TSH only stimulated cells. Furthermore, the combination of TSH and oscillatory motion produced a greater response than mechanical or chemical stimulation alone. Taken together, these results suggest that mechanical vibrations could provide stimulatory cues that help maintain thyroid function.Entities:
Keywords: Endocrine system; FRTL-5; Low amplitude mechanical signals; Mechanobiology; Mechanotransduction
Year: 2016 PMID: 28955979 PMCID: PMC5614476 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.10.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
Fig. 1Torsional Rheometer Bioreactor (A) Image of the TRB enclosed in an environmentally controlled chamber. (B) Schematic of the components of the multi-disc assembly, including the locations of the eight wells used in each study. Four of the wells were chemically stimulated with TSH in addition to receiving oscillatory mechanical signals. The other four wells received no TSH.
Fig. 2FRTL-5 Metabolic Activity, ROS production, and Cell Number in Response to Treatment. (A). Oscillation significantly increased FRTL-5 cell metabolic activity compared to no oscillation both with and without TSH (* p=0.0244, ** p=0.0014, *** p=0.0002, **** p<0.0001). (B) Oscillation significantly increased ROS compared to no oscillation both with (** p=0.0026) and without (** p=0.0077) TSH (p****< 0.0001). (C) Cell number was not significantly affected by TSH or oscillation.
Fig. 3Gene expression normalized to 18 s and to control (i.e., no oscillation, no TSH). (A) The combination of TSH and oscillation (TSH+OSC) resulted in a 100% increase in thyroglobulin expression (p=0.0406). (B) Sodium Iodide Symporter (NIS) expression increased approximately 3 to 5-fold (though not significantly) for all three cases of stimulation compared to controls.
Fig. 4cAMP Levels in Response to Treatment. cAMP levels increased in response to treatments with either TSH or oscillation. TSH and oscillation produced the highest levels of cAMP, which were significantly greater than control (* p=0.0121, n =3).