| Literature DB >> 26601709 |
Da Jing1, Shichao Tong1, Mingming Zhai1, Xiaokang Li2, Jing Cai3, Yan Wu2, Guanghao Shen1, Xuhui Zhang1, Qiaoling Xu4, Zheng Guo2, Erping Luo1.
Abstract
Emerging evidence substantiates the potential of porous <<span class="Gene">span class="Chemical">titaniumspan> alloy (pTi) as an ideal bone-graft substitute because of its excellent biocompatibility and structural properties. However, it remains a major clinical concern for promoting high-efficiency and high-quality osseointeg<spaspan>n class="Species">ration of pTi, which is beneficial for securing long-term implant stability. Accumulating evidence demonst<span class="Species">rates the capacity of low-amplitude whole-body vibration (WBV) in preventing osteopenia, whereas the effects and mechanisms of WBV on osteogenesis and osseointegration of pTi remain unclear. Our present study shows that WBV enhanced cellular attachment and proliferation, and induced well-organized cytoskeleton of primary osteoblasts in pTi. WBV upregulated osteogenesis-associated gene and protein expression in primary osteoblasts, including OCN, Runx2, Wnt3a, Lrp6 and β-catenin. In vivo findings demonstrate that 6-week and 12-week WBV stimulated osseointegration, bone ingrowth and bone formation rate of pTi in rabbit femoral bone defects via μCT, histological and histomorphometric analyses. WBV induced higher ALP, OCN, Runx2, BMP2, Wnt3a, Lrp6 and β-catenin, and lower Sost and RANKL/OPG gene expression in rabbit femora. Our findings demonstrate that WBV promotes osteogenesis and osseointegration of pTi via its anabolic effect and potential anti-catabolic activity, and imply the promising potential of WBV for enhancing the repair efficiency and quality of pTi in osseous defects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26601709 PMCID: PMC4658533 DOI: 10.1038/srep17134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Characterization of Ti6Al4V pTi samples (70% porosity and 750-μm pore size) and WBV system setups for in vivo and in vitro experiments.
(A) Gross view of pTi discs used for in vitro experiments (12.0-mm diameter and 2.5-mm thickness) and pTi implants used for in vivo experiments (6.0-mm diameter and 8.0-mm length). (B) Microstructural observation of pTi implants via SEM scanning. Scale bar represents 200 μm. (C ~ D) Surgical photograph for the establishment of cylindrical bone defect with 6.0-mm diameter and 8.0-mm length in the femoral lateral condyle of rabbits. A pTi implant was then transplanted into the bone defect site and the accuracy of the location of bone defect was further confirmed via X-ray scanning. (E ~ F) Schematic representation of the WBV systems for in vivo and in vitro experiments. For in vivo WBV stimulation, rabbits were placed onto the WBV platform (100 cm × 100 cm × 30 cm) and confined individually by inverted plastic cages (40 cm × 30 cm × 25 cm). For the in vitro experiment, 6-well dishes filled with primary osteoblast-seeded pTi implants were placed on the platform (30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm). The vertical vibratory motion was generated by an electromagnetic actuator mounted beneath the platform. The two WBV systems generated a sinusoidal waveform with a vertical acceleration of 0.5 g at a frequency of 30 Hz.
The sequence of primers used in the present study for in vitro and in vivo real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR.
| Genes | Primers | Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | Product Length (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALP | Forward | ACGGGGCGTGTATCCTCCAA | 182 |
| Reverse | CCCAAGGAGGCAGGATTGAC | ||
| OCN | Forward | TTGGTGCACACCTAGCAGAC | 187 |
| Reverse | ACCTTATTGCCCTCCTGCTT | ||
| Runx-2 | Forward | CAGTCTTACCCCTCTTACC | 130 |
| Reverse | CATCTTTACCTGAAATGCG | ||
| BMP2 | Forward | GGACGACATCCTGAGCGAGT | 117 |
| Reverse | CGGCGGTACAAGTCCAGCAT | ||
| Sost | Forward | TCTCCCTAGCCCTGTGTCTCCT | 100 |
| Reverse | ACTTCCGTGGCGTCATTCTTGA | ||
| Wnt3a | Forward | ATGAACCGCCACAACAAC | 190 |
| Reverse | GCTTCTCCACCACCATCT | ||
| Lrp6 | Forward | GCTTGGCACTTGTATGTAAA | 179 |
| Reverse | TGGGCTAAGATCATCAGACT | ||
| β-catenin | Forward | GACACGGACCACACGCACAA | 173 |
| Reverse | CCGAGCAGCAGCAAGTCTTCT | ||
| OPG | Forward | AACGGCGGCATAGTTCACAAGA | 170 |
| Reverse | GCTGCGAAGCTGATCCAAGGT | ||
| BMP2 | Forward | GGACGACATCCTGAGCGAGT | 117 |
| Reverse | CGGCGGTACAAGTCCAGCAT | ||
| β-Actin | Forward | TACGCCAACACGGTGCTGTC | 187 |
| Reverse | ACATCTGCTGGAAGGTGGAGAG |
Figure 2Effects of mechanical vibration stimulation on in vitro cellular attachment, proliferation, mineralization and morphology for primary rabbit osteoblasts seeded in pTi.
(A) Comparisons of in vitro osteoblastic proliferation between the Control and WBV groups via MTT assays (n = 5). (B) Representative SEM scanning for in vitro primary osteoblasts seeded in pTi in the Control and WBV groups. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (C) Comparisons of in vitro osteoblastic attachment between the Control and WBV groups via DAPI staining (n = 4). Scale bar represents 20 μm. (D) Representative in vitro osteoblastic FITC cytoskeleton staining images in the Control and WBV groups. Scale bar represents 20 μm. (E) Comparisons of in vitro osteoblastic mineralization between the Control and WBV groups via quantitative Alizarin red-S staining (n = 15). Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.
Figure 3Effects of mechanical vibration stimulation on in vitro osteogenesis-related gene expression for primary rabbit osteoblasts seeded in pTi via qRT-PCR analyses, including ALP, OCN, Runx2, BMP2, OPG, Wnt3a, Lrp6 and β-catenin. Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 4), and the relative expression level of each gene was normalized to β-Actin.
*Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.
Figure 4Effects of mechanical vibration stimulation on in vitro osteogenesis-related protein expression for primary rabbit osteoblasts seeded in pTi via western blotting analyses, including OCN, Runx2, Wnt3a, Lrp6 and β-catenin.
Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3 ~ 4). The relative expression level of each protein was normalized to β-Tubulin. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.
Figure 5Effects of WBV stimulation for 6 weeks and 12 weeks on the osteogenesis and osseointegration of pTi implants in the region of bone defects via μCT scanning.
A tube volume with 6.0-mm diameter and 8.0-mm length was defined as the volume of interest (VOI), which completely covered the region of the pTi implant. (A) Reconstructed 3-D μCT images determined by the VOI and 2-D mid-coronal and mid-sagittal slices. The regions with white color represent titanium alloys and the areas with yellow color represent cancellous bones. (B) Quantitative comparisons of μCT characteristic parameters of trabecular bones between the Control and WBV groups (n = 6), including bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV), bone surface per bone volume (BS/BV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp). Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.
Figure 6Effects of WBV stimulation for 6 weeks and 12 weeks on cancellous bone histology in the region of bone defects via Masson-Goldner trichrome staining.
(A) Representative histological images for bone microarchitecture in the region of bone defects by Masson-Goldner trichrome staining. The black areas represent titanium alloys and the red areas represent cancellous bones. Scale bar equals 100 μm. (B) Quantitative comparisons of bone area fraction (bone area per total area) determined by the histological analyses between the Control and WBV groups (n = 6). Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.
Figure 7Effects of WBV stimulation for 6 weeks and 12 weeks on dynamic histomorphometric parameters in the region of bone defects via double calcein labeling.
(A) Representative calcein double-labeling sections in the region of bone defects. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (B) Quantitative comparisons of the dynamic histomorphometric parameters, including mineral apposition rate (MAR), mineralizing surface per bone surface (MS/BS) and bone formation rate per bone surface (BFR/BS) between the Control and WBV groups (n = 6). Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.
Figure 8Effects of WBV stimulation for 6 weeks and 12 weeks on in vivo osteogenesis-related gene expression in rabbit femora via qRT-PCR analyses, including ALP, OCN, Runx2, BMP2, Sost, OPG, RANKL, Wnt3a, Lrp6 and β-catenin.
Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3 ~ 6) and the relative expression level of each gene was normalized to β-Actin. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.