Literature DB >> 23371467

The potential benefits and inherent risks of vibration as a non-drug therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

M Ete Chan1, Gunes Uzer, Clinton T Rubin.   

Abstract

The delivery of mechanical signals to the skeleton using vibration is being considered as a non-drug treatment of osteoporosis. Delivered over a range of magnitudes and frequencies, vibration has been shown to be both anabolic and anti-catabolic to the musculoskeletal tissues, yet caution must be emphasized as these mechanical signals, particularly chronic exposure to higher intensities, is a known pathogen to many physiological systems. In contrast, accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that low intensity vibration (LIV) improves bone quality through regulating the activity of cells responsible for bone remodeling, as well as biasing the differentiation fate of their mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cell progenitors. In vitro studies provide insights into the biologic mechanisms of LIV, and indicate that cells respond to these low magnitude signals through a distinct mechanism driven not by matrix strain but acceleration. These cell, animal, and human studies may represent the foundation of a safe, non-drug means to protect and improve the musculoskeletal system of the elderly, injured, and infirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371467      PMCID: PMC3586310          DOI: 10.1007/s11914-012-0132-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  75 in total

1.  Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains.

Authors:  S P Fritton; K J McLeod; C T Rubin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the high-frequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone.

Authors:  C Rubin; A S Turner; C Mallinckrodt; C Jerome; K McLeod; S Bain
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Extracellular matrix produced by osteoblasts cultured under low-magnitude, high-frequency stimulation is favourable to osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Virginie Dumas; Benjamin Ducharne; Anthony Perrier; Carole Fournier; Alain Guignandon; Mireille Thomas; Sylvie Peyroche; Daniel Guyomar; Laurence Vico; Aline Rattner
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Low-level mechanical vibrations can influence bone resorption and bone formation in the growing skeleton.

Authors:  Liqin Xie; Jeffrey M Jacobson; Edna S Choi; Bhavin Busa; Leah Rae Donahue; Lisa M Miller; Clinton T Rubin; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation promotes osteogenesis while preventing dietary-induced obesity.

Authors:  Yen Kim Luu; Encarnacion Capilla; Clifford J Rosen; Vicente Gilsanz; Jeffrey E Pessin; Stefan Judex; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Two doses of sclerostin antibody in cynomolgus monkeys increases bone formation, bone mineral density, and bone strength.

Authors:  Michael S Ominsky; Fay Vlasseros; Jacquelin Jolette; Susan Y Smith; Brian Stouch; George Doellgast; Jianhua Gong; Yongming Gao; Jin Cao; Kevin Graham; Barbara Tipton; Jill Cai; Rohini Deshpande; Lei Zhou; Michael D Hale; Daniel J Lightwood; Alistair J Henry; Andrew G Popplewell; Adrian R Moore; Martyn K Robinson; David L Lacey; W Scott Simonet; Chris Paszty
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Mechanical modulation of molecular signals which regulate anabolic and catabolic activity in bone tissue.

Authors:  Stefan Judex; Nan Zhong; Maria E Squire; Kenny Ye; Leah-Rae Donahue; Michael Hadjiargyrou; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 4.429

8.  Effect of whole-body vibration exercise on lumbar bone mineral density, bone turnover, and chronic back pain in post-menopausal osteoporotic women treated with alendronate.

Authors:  Jun Iwamoto; Tsuyoshi Takeda; Yoshihiro Sato; Mitsuyoshi Uzawa
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 9.  [Effects of SERMs on bone health. Evidence for the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene: its evolving role in the treatment of osteoporosis].

Authors:  Hiroaki Ohta
Journal:  Clin Calcium       Date:  2010-03

10.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Muscle-bone interactions: basic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Luisella Cianferotti; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity.

Authors:  Gabriel M Pagnotti; Maya Styner; Gunes Uzer; Vihitaben S Patel; Laura E Wright; Kirsten K Ness; Theresa A Guise; Janet Rubin; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 3.  Clinical applications of vibration therapy in orthopaedic practice.

Authors:  Simone Cerciello; Silvio Rossi; Enrico Visonà; Katia Corona; Francesco Oliva
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-05-19

4.  Cell Mechanosensitivity to Extremely Low-Magnitude Signals Is Enabled by a LINCed Nucleus.

Authors:  Gunes Uzer; William R Thompson; Buer Sen; Zhihui Xie; Sherwin S Yen; Sean Miller; Guniz Bas; Maya Styner; Clinton T Rubin; Stefan Judex; Keith Burridge; Janet Rubin
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  Cell Mechanosensitivity is Enabled by the LINC Nuclear Complex.

Authors:  Gunes Uzer; Clinton T Rubin; Janet Rubin
Journal:  Curr Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 6.  Vibration therapy: clinical applications in bone.

Authors:  William R Thompson; Sherwin S Yen; Janet Rubin
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.243

7.  Isolated nuclei stiffen in response to low intensity vibration.

Authors:  Joshua Newberg; Jesse Schimpf; Kali Woods; Stacie Loisate; Paul H Davis; Gunes Uzer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Mechanical signals protect stem cell lineage selection, preserving the bone and muscle phenotypes in obesity.

Authors:  Danielle M Frechette; Divya Krishnamoorthy; Tee Pamon; M Ete Chan; Vihitaben Patel; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Effect of Low-Magnitude Mechanical Stimuli on Bone Density and Structure in Pediatric Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mary B Leonard; Justine Shults; Jin Long; Robert N Baldassano; J Keenan Brown; Kevin Hommel; Babette S Zemel; Soroosh Mahboubi; Krista Howard Whitehead; Rita Herskovitz; Dale Lee; Joseph Rausch; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Dose-Response Effect of Vibratory Stimulus on Synaptic and Muscle Plasticity in a Middle-Aged Murine Model.

Authors:  Ida Cariati; Roberto Bonanni; Giuseppe Annino; Manuel Scimeca; Elena Bonanno; Giovanna D'Arcangelo; Virginia Tancredi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.