Literature DB >> 22372937

A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.

Idir Ouzaid1, Said Al-qahtani, Sébastien Dominique, Vincent Hupertan, Pédro Fernandez, Jean-François Hermieu, Vincent Delmas, Vincent Ravery.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is reported to be a prognosis factor for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). In this prospective study, we determined that a 970 HU threshold of stone density is a very specific and sensitive threshold beyond which the likelihood to be rendered stone free is poor. Thus, NCCT evaluation of stone density before ESWL may useful to identify which patients should be offered alternative treatment to optimise their outcome.
OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate the usefulness of measuring urinary calculi attenuation values by non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for predicting the outcome of treatment by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • We prospectively evaluated 50 patients with urinary calculi of 5-22 mm undergoing ESWL. • All patients had NCCT at 120 kV and 100 mA on a spiral CT scanner. Patient age, sex, body mass index, stone laterality, stone size, stone attenuation values (Hounsfield units [HU]), stone location, and presence of JJ stent were studied as potential predictors. • The outcome was evaluated 4 weeks after the ESWL session by NCCT. • ESWL success was defined as patients being stone-free (SF) or with remaining stone fragments of <4 mm, which were considered as clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF).
RESULTS: • Our survey concluded that 26 patients (52%) were SF, 12 (24%) had CIRF and 12 (24%) had residual fragment on NCCT after a one ESWL treatment. • Stones of patients who became SF or had CIRF had a lower density compared with stones in patients with residual fragments [mean (sd) 715 (260) vs 1196 (171) HU, P < 0.001]. • The Youden Index showed that a stone density of 970 HU represented the most sensitive (100%) and specific (81%) point on the receiver-operating characteristic curve. • The stone-free rate for stones of <970 HU was 96% vs 38% for stones of ≥ 970 HU (P < 0.001). A linear relationship between the calculus density and the success rate of ESWL was identified.
CONCLUSION: • The use of NCCT to determine the attenuation values of urinary calculi before ESWL helps to predict treatment outcome, and, consequently, could be helpful in planning alternative treatment for patients with a likelihood of a poor outcome from ESWL.
© 2012 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22372937     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  45 in total

1.  Predicting the mineral composition of ureteral stone using non-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Manabu Kakizoe; Yoshitake Kato; Hitoshi Ishiguro; Hiroji Uemura; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Predictive value of low tube voltage and dual-energy CT for successful shock wave lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Remo Largo; Paul Stolzmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Pirmin Wolfsgruber; Tullio Sulser; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones.

Authors:  Adnan Gücük; Uğur Uyetürk
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

5.  The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.

Authors:  Yusuke Sugino; Takahiro Kato; Shigeru Furuya; Takeshi Sasaki; Kiminobu Arima; Yoshiki Sugimura
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Langenauer; P Betschart; L Hechelhammer; S Güsewell; H P Schmid; D S Engeler; D Abt; V Zumstein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  A novel use of attenuation value (Hounsfield unit) in non-contrast CT: diagnosis of urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Ismail Basmaci; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Ertugrul Sefik; Serdar Celik; Serkan Yarimoglu; Tansu Degirmenci
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  The feasibility of shockwave lithotripsy for treating solitary, lower calyceal stones over 1 cm in size.

Authors:  Tae Beom Kim; Sang Cheol Lee; Khae Hawn Kim; Han Jung; Sang Jin Yoon; Jin Kyu Oh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  A novel use of attenuation value (Hounsfield unit) in non-contrast CT: diagnosis of pyonephrosis in obstructed systems.

Authors:  Ismail Basmaci; Ertugrul Sefik
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.