Literature DB >> 19007365

Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Gaurav Bandi1, Ryan J Meiners, Perry J Pickhardt, Stephen Y Nakada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of stone volume measured using a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of preoperative non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) as an independent predictor of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of upper urinary tract calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated preoperative NCCT in 94 patients who had ESWL for solitary upper urinary tract calculi of 4-20 mm in diameter. Axial images were used to measure the skin-to-stone distance (SSD), Hounsfield Unit (HU) density and axial stone diameter. Stone volume was calculated on a volume-rendered 3D image for each stone. Maximum stone length was determined by comparative measurements of each stone in coronal, sagittal and axial planes, and was also measured on a plain abdominal film before ESWL. For ESWL we used the DoliS lithotripter (Dornier Medical Systems, Marrietta, GA, USA). A plain film at 6 weeks was used to categorize patients as stone-free (SF) or with residual stone.
RESULTS: In all, 58 (62%) patients were SF and 36 (38%) had RS; the mean stone volume was significantly different between these groups (274 vs 464 microL, P = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis showed that stone volume was the strongest predictor of SF status (P < 0.001), compared to peak HU (P = 0.015), mean HU (P = 0.04) and axial stone diameter (P = 0.006). The body mass index, SSD and maximum stone length on NCCT or a plain film did not predict success. A stone volume of <500 microL best predicted treatment success (P < 0.001) with 72% of patients with a stone volume of <500 microL having a successful outcome, vs only 27% with a stone volume of >500 microL.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that stone volume is an optimal predictor of SF status after ESWL of solitary upper urinary tract calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19007365     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08069.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  27 in total

1.  Predicting the mineral composition of ureteral stone using non-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Manabu Kakizoe; Yoshitake Kato; Hitoshi Ishiguro; Hiroji Uemura; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Consistency of Renal Stone Volume Measurements Across CT Scanner Model and Reconstruction Algorithm Configurations.

Authors:  Alice E Huang; Juan C Montoya; Maria Shiung; Shuai Leng; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Using a three-dimensional computer assisted stone volume estimates to evaluate extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of kidney stones.

Authors:  Lene Hyldgaard Bigum; Peter Sommer Ulriksen; Omar Salah Omar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.

Authors:  Yusuke Sugino; Takahiro Kato; Shigeru Furuya; Takeshi Sasaki; Kiminobu Arima; Yoshiki Sugimura
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Langenauer; P Betschart; L Hechelhammer; S Güsewell; H P Schmid; D S Engeler; D Abt; V Zumstein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Computer-aided detection of renal calculi from noncontrast CT images using TV-flow and MSER features.

Authors:  Jianfei Liu; Shijun Wang; Evrim B Turkbey; Marius George Linguraru; Jianhua Yao; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

8.  Kidney stone volume estimation from computerized tomography images using a model based method of correcting for the point spread function.

Authors:  Xinhui Duan; Jia Wang; Mingliang Qu; Shuai Leng; Yu Liu; Amy Krambeck; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The effect of abdominal fat parameters on percutaneous nephrolithotomy success.

Authors:  Ozgur Cakmak; Huseyin Tarhan; Sertac Cimen; Rahmi Gokhan Ekin; Ilker Akarken; Ozgur Oztekin; Ertan Can; Tufan Suelozgen; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Kidney stones and imaging: what can your radiologist do for you?

Authors:  Raphaële Renard-Penna; Aurélie Martin; Pierre Conort; Pierre Mozer; Philippe Grenier
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.