OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of stone volume measured using a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of preoperative non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) as an independent predictor of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of upper urinary tract calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated preoperative NCCT in 94 patients who had ESWL for solitary upper urinary tract calculi of 4-20 mm in diameter. Axial images were used to measure the skin-to-stone distance (SSD), Hounsfield Unit (HU) density and axial stone diameter. Stone volume was calculated on a volume-rendered 3D image for each stone. Maximum stone length was determined by comparative measurements of each stone in coronal, sagittal and axial planes, and was also measured on a plain abdominal film before ESWL. For ESWL we used the DoliS lithotripter (Dornier Medical Systems, Marrietta, GA, USA). A plain film at 6 weeks was used to categorize patients as stone-free (SF) or with residual stone. RESULTS: In all, 58 (62%) patients were SF and 36 (38%) had RS; the mean stone volume was significantly different between these groups (274 vs 464 microL, P = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis showed that stone volume was the strongest predictor of SF status (P < 0.001), compared to peak HU (P = 0.015), mean HU (P = 0.04) and axial stone diameter (P = 0.006). The body mass index, SSD and maximum stone length on NCCT or a plain film did not predict success. A stone volume of <500 microL best predicted treatment success (P < 0.001) with 72% of patients with a stone volume of <500 microL having a successful outcome, vs only 27% with a stone volume of >500 microL. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that stone volume is an optimal predictor of SF status after ESWL of solitary upper urinary tract calculi.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of stone volume measured using a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of preoperative non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) as an independent predictor of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of upper urinary tract calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated preoperative NCCT in 94 patients who had ESWL for solitary upper urinary tract calculi of 4-20 mm in diameter. Axial images were used to measure the skin-to-stone distance (SSD), Hounsfield Unit (HU) density and axial stone diameter. Stone volume was calculated on a volume-rendered 3D image for each stone. Maximum stone length was determined by comparative measurements of each stone in coronal, sagittal and axial planes, and was also measured on a plain abdominal film before ESWL. For ESWL we used the DoliS lithotripter (Dornier Medical Systems, Marrietta, GA, USA). A plain film at 6 weeks was used to categorize patients as stone-free (SF) or with residual stone. RESULTS: In all, 58 (62%) patients were SF and 36 (38%) had RS; the mean stone volume was significantly different between these groups (274 vs 464 microL, P = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis showed that stone volume was the strongest predictor of SF status (P < 0.001), compared to peak HU (P = 0.015), mean HU (P = 0.04) and axial stone diameter (P = 0.006). The body mass index, SSD and maximum stone length on NCCT or a plain film did not predict success. A stone volume of <500 microL best predicted treatment success (P < 0.001) with 72% of patients with a stone volume of <500 microL having a successful outcome, vs only 27% with a stone volume of >500 microL. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that stone volume is an optimal predictor of SF status after ESWL of solitary upper urinary tract calculi.
Authors: Alice E Huang; Juan C Montoya; Maria Shiung; Shuai Leng; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: J Langenauer; P Betschart; L Hechelhammer; S Güsewell; H P Schmid; D S Engeler; D Abt; V Zumstein Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jianfei Liu; Shijun Wang; Evrim B Turkbey; Marius George Linguraru; Jianhua Yao; Ronald M Summers Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Raphaële Renard-Penna; Aurélie Martin; Pierre Conort; Pierre Mozer; Philippe Grenier Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-10-26 Impact factor: 4.226