Literature DB >> 28947660

Regulation of X-chromosome dosage compensation in human: mechanisms and model systems.

Anna Sahakyan1, Kathrin Plath2, Claire Rougeulle3.   

Abstract

The human blastocyst forms 5 days after one of the smallest human cells (the sperm) fertilizes one of the largest human cells (the egg). Depending on the sex-chromosome contribution from the sperm, the resulting embryo will either be female, with two X chromosomes (XX), or male, with an X and a Y chromosome (XY). In early development, one of the major differences between XX female and XY male embryos is the conserved process of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), which compensates gene expression of the two female X chromosomes to match the dosage of the single X chromosome of males. Most of our understanding of the pre-XCI state and XCI establishment is based on mouse studies, but recent evidence from human pre-implantation embryo research suggests that many of the molecular steps defined in the mouse are not conserved in human. Here, we will discuss recent advances in understanding the control of X-chromosome dosage compensation in early human embryonic development and compare it to that of the mouse.This article is part of the themed issue 'X-chromosome inactivation: a tribute to Mary Lyon'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-chromosome dampening; X-chromosome inactivation; Xact; Xist; pluripotent stem cells

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28947660      PMCID: PMC5627163          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  65 in total

1.  Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA.

Authors:  Anton Wutz; Theodore P Rasmussen; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Arie P Otte; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Edith Heard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Tatyana B Nesterova; Mariana de Napoles; Ruth Appanah; Shinya Yamanaka; Arie P Otte; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations.

Authors:  Christopher J Lengner; Alexander A Gimelbrant; Jennifer A Erwin; Albert Wu Cheng; Matthew G Guenther; G Grant Welstead; Raaji Alagappan; Garrett M Frampton; Ping Xu; Julien Muffat; Sandro Santagata; Doug Powers; C Brent Barrett; Richard A Young; Jeannie T Lee; Rudolf Jaenisch; Maisam Mitalipova
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Unexpected X chromosome skewing during culture and reprogramming of human somatic cells can be alleviated by exogenous telomerase.

Authors:  Oz Pomp; Oliver Dreesen; Denise Fong Mei Leong; Orit Meller-Pomp; Thong Teck Tan; Fan Zhou; Alan Colman
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Derivation of naive human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Carol B Ware; Angelique M Nelson; Brigham Mecham; Jennifer Hesson; Wenyu Zhou; Erica C Jonlin; Antonio J Jimenez-Caliani; Xinxian Deng; Christopher Cavanaugh; Savannah Cook; Paul J Tesar; Jeffrey Okada; Lilyana Margaretha; Henrik Sperber; Michael Choi; C Anthony Blau; Piper M Treuting; R David Hawkins; Vincenzo Cirulli; Hannele Ruohola-Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Erosion of dosage compensation impacts human iPSC disease modeling.

Authors:  Shila Mekhoubad; Christoph Bock; A Sophie de Boer; Evangelos Kiskinis; Alexander Meissner; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  Human Embryonic Stem Cells Do Not Change Their X Inactivation Status during Differentiation.

Authors:  Sanjeet Patel; Giancarlo Bonora; Anna Sahakyan; Rachel Kim; Constantinos Chronis; Justin Langerman; Sorel Fitz-Gibbon; Liudmilla Rubbi; Rhys J P Skelton; Reza Ardehali; Matteo Pellegrini; William E Lowry; Amander T Clark; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 9.995

9.  A Pooled shRNA Screen Identifies Rbm15, Spen, and Wtap as Factors Required for Xist RNA-Mediated Silencing.

Authors:  Benoit Moindrot; Andrea Cerase; Heather Coker; Osamu Masui; Anne Grijzenhout; Greta Pintacuda; Lothar Schermelleh; Tatyana B Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Chromosomes. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation.

Authors:  Anand Minajigi; John Froberg; Chunyao Wei; Hongjae Sunwoo; Barry Kesner; David Colognori; Derek Lessing; Bernhard Payer; Myriam Boukhali; Wilhelm Haas; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dosage compensation in human pre-implantation embryos: X-chromosome inactivation or dampening?

Authors:  Roni Saiba; Maniteja Arava; Srimonta Gayen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Preface.

Authors:  Edith Heard; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The Role of Xist in X-Chromosome Dosage Compensation.

Authors:  Anna Sahakyan; Yihao Yang; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 4.  Epigenetic aberrations in human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Shiran Bar; Nissim Benvenisty
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  The Ambivalent Role of lncRNA Xist in Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Yung-Kang Chen; Yun Yen
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 6.  All models are wrong, but some are useful: Establishing standards for stem cell-based embryo models.

Authors:  Eszter Posfai; Fredrik Lanner; Carla Mulas; Harry G Leitch
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 7.765

7.  Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Partial Reactivation of X Chromosome instead of Chromosome-wide Dampening in Naive Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Susmita Mandal; Deepshikha Chandel; Harman Kaur; Sudeshna Majumdar; Maniteja Arava; Srimonta Gayen
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 7.765

Review 8.  The tandem repeat modules of Xist lncRNA: a swiss army knife for the control of X-chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Ana Cláudia Raposo; Miguel Casanova; Anne-Valerie Gendrel; Simão Teixeira da Rocha
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 5.407

9.  Developmental Epigenetics: Phenotype and the Flexible Epigenome.

Authors:  Rosalind M John; Claire Rougeulle
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-10-11

10.  Loss of SETDB1 decompacts the inactive X chromosome in part through reactivation of an enhancer in the IL1RAPL1 gene.

Authors:  Zhuo Sun; Brian P Chadwick
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 4.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.