Literature DB >> 20471072

Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations.

Christopher J Lengner1, Alexander A Gimelbrant, Jennifer A Erwin, Albert Wu Cheng, Matthew G Guenther, G Grant Welstead, Raaji Alagappan, Garrett M Frampton, Ping Xu, Julien Muffat, Sandro Santagata, Doug Powers, C Brent Barrett, Richard A Young, Jeannie T Lee, Rudolf Jaenisch, Maisam Mitalipova.   

Abstract

The presence of two active X chromosomes (XaXa) is a hallmark of the ground state of pluripotency specific to murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Human ESCs (hESCs) invariably exhibit signs of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) and are considered developmentally more advanced than their murine counterparts. We describe the establishment of XaXa hESCs derived under physiological oxygen concentrations. Using these cell lines, we demonstrate that (1) differentiation of hESCs induces random XCI in a manner similar to murine ESCs, (2) chronic exposure to atmospheric oxygen is sufficient to induce irreversible XCI with minor changes of the transcriptome, (3) the Xa exhibits heavy methylation of the XIST promoter region, and (4) XCI is associated with demethylation and transcriptional activation of XIST along with H3K27-me3 deposition across the Xi. These findings indicate that the human blastocyst contains pre-X-inactivation cells and that this state is preserved in vitro through culture under physiological oxygen. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20471072     DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  185 in total

1.  Oxygen levels that optimize TSC culture are identified by maximizing growth rates and minimizing stress.

Authors:  S Zhou; Y Xie; E E Puscheck; D A Rappolee
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 2.  The lesser known story of X chromosome reactivation: a closer look into the reprogramming of the inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  Eriona Hysolli; Yong Wook Jung; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Kun-Yong Kim; In-Hyun Park
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Tracing the genesis of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Ariel Pribluda; Jacob H Hanna
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Tracking the progression of the human inner cell mass during embryonic stem cell derivation.

Authors:  Thomas O'Leary; Björn Heindryckx; Sylvie Lierman; David van Bruggen; Jelle J Goeman; Mado Vandewoestyne; Dieter Deforce; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Petra De Sutter
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Delineating nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Jolene Ooi; Pentao Liu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 14.870

6.  Genetic and epigenetic X-chromosome variations in a parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Weiqiang Liu; Yifei Yin; Yonghua Jiang; Chaohui Kou; Yumei Luo; Shengchang Huang; Yuhong Zheng; Shaoying Li; Qing Li; Liyuan Guo; Shaorong Gao; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  HIF hits Wnt in the stem cell niche.

Authors:  Dan S Kaufman
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 9.  Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues.

Authors:  Jacob H Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Concise Review: Lessons from Naïve Human Pluripotent Cells.

Authors:  Carol B Ware
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.