Literature DB >> 28943682

Residual Weighted Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules.

Xin Zhou1, Nicole Mayer-Hamblett2, Umer Khan3, Michael R Kosorok4.   

Abstract

Personalized medicine has received increasing attention among statisticians, computer scientists, and clinical practitioners. A major component of personalized medicine is the estimation of individualized treatment rules (ITRs). Recently, Zhao et al. (2012) proposed outcome weighted learning (OWL) to construct ITRs that directly optimize the clinical outcome. Although OWL opens the door to introducing machine learning techniques to optimal treatment regimes, it still has some problems in performance. (1) The estimated ITR of OWL is affected by a simple shift of the outcome. (2) The rule from OWL tries to keep treatment assignments that subjects actually received. (3) There is no variable selection mechanism with OWL. All of them weaken the finite sample performance of OWL. In this article, we propose a general framework, called Residual Weighted Learning (RWL), to alleviate these problems, and hence to improve finite sample performance. Unlike OWL which weights misclassification errors by clinical outcomes, RWL weights these errors by residuals of the outcome from a regression fit on clinical covariates excluding treatment assignment. We utilize the smoothed ramp loss function in RWL, and provide a difference of convex (d.c.) algorithm to solve the corresponding non-convex optimization problem. By estimating residuals with linear models or generalized linear models, RWL can effectively deal with different types of outcomes, such as continuous, binary and count outcomes. We also propose variable selection methods for linear and nonlinear rules, respectively, to further improve the performance. We show that the resulting estimator of the treatment rule is consistent. We further obtain a rate of convergence for the difference between the expected outcome using the estimated ITR and that of the optimal treatment rule. The performance of the proposed RWL methods is illustrated in simulation studies and in an analysis of cystic fibrosis clinical trial data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convergence Rate; Martingale residuals; Optimal Treatment Regime; RKHS; Residuals; Universal consistency

Year:  2017        PMID: 28943682      PMCID: PMC5607057          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1093947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  15 in total

1.  The concave-convex procedure.

Authors:  A L Yuille; Anand Rangarajan
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Hybrid huberized support vector machines for microarray classification and gene selection.

Authors:  Li Wang; Ji Zhu; Hui Zou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Michael R Kosorok; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

6.  Variable Selection for Qualitative Interactions.

Authors:  L Gunter; J Zhu; S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2011-01-30

7.  Comparative efficacy and safety of 4 randomized regimens to treat early Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in children with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Miriam M Treggiari; George Retsch-Bogart; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Umer Khan; Michal Kulich; Richard Kronmal; Judy Williams; Peter Hiatt; Ronald L Gibson; Terry Spencer; David Orenstein; Barbara A Chatfield; Deborah K Froh; Jane L Burns; Margaret Rosenfeld; Bonnie W Ramsey
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-09

8.  Classification of gene microarrays by penalized logistic regression.

Authors:  Ji Zhu; Trevor Hastie
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.899

9.  Early anti-pseudomonal acquisition in young patients with cystic fibrosis: rationale and design of the EPIC clinical trial and observational study'.

Authors:  Miriam M Treggiari; Margaret Rosenfeld; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; George Retsch-Bogart; Ronald L Gibson; Judy Williams; Julia Emerson; Richard A Kronmal; Bonnie W Ramsey
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  New Statistical Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Eric B Laber; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

View more
  32 in total

1.  Efficacy of the Flexible Lifestyles Empowering Change intervention on metabolic and psychosocial outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (FLEX): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; David M Maahs; Michael Seid; Jamie Crandell; Franziska K Bishop; Kimberly A Driscoll; Christine M Hunter; Jessica C Kichler; Debra Standiford; Joan M Thomas
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-07-30

2.  Comparing cluster-level dynamic treatment regimens using sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials: Regression estimation and sample size considerations.

Authors:  Timothy NeCamp; Amy Kilbourne; Daniel Almirall
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Flexible functional regression methods for estimating individualized treatment regimes.

Authors:  Adam Ciarleglio; Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey; R Todd Ogden
Journal:  Stat (Int Stat Inst)       Date:  2016-05-31

4.  Greedy outcome weighted tree learning of optimal personalized treatment rules.

Authors:  Ruoqing Zhu; Ying-Qi Zhao; Guanhua Chen; Shuangge Ma; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Estimating individualized treatment regimes from crossover designs.

Authors:  Crystal T Nguyen; Daniel J Luckett; Anna R Kahkoska; Grace E Shearrer; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jaimie N Davis; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Estimating individualized treatment rules for ordinal treatments.

Authors:  Jingxiang Chen; Haoda Fu; Xuanyao He; Michael R Kosorok; Yufeng Liu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Michael R Kosorok; Eric B Laber
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Prospects and challenges for clinical decision support in the era of big data.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Michael R Kosorok; Judy Jin; Michelle Mierzwa; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-11-09

9.  Constructing treatment decision rules based on scalar and functional predictors when moderators of treatment effect are unknown.

Authors:  Adam Ciarleglio; Eva Petkova; Todd Ogden; Thaddeus Tarpey
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.864

10.  Learning-based biomarker-assisted rules for optimized clinical benefit under a risk constraint.

Authors:  Yanqing Wang; Ying-Qi Zhao; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.