Literature DB >> 21179592

Variable Selection for Qualitative Interactions.

L Gunter1, J Zhu, S A Murphy.   

Abstract

In this article we discuss variable selection for decision making with focus on decisions regarding when to provide treatment and which treatment to provide. Current variable selection techniques were developed for use in a supervised learning setting where the goal is prediction of the response. These techniques often downplay the importance of interaction variables that have small predictive ability but that are critical when the ultimate goal is decision making rather than prediction. We propose two new techniques designed specifically to find variables that aid in decision making. Simulation results are given along with an application of the methods on data from a randomized controlled trial for the treatment of depression.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21179592      PMCID: PMC3003934          DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2009.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methodol        ISSN: 1572-3127


  13 in total

1.  Simultaneous regression shrinkage, variable selection, and supervised clustering of predictors with OSCAR.

Authors:  Howard D Bondell; Brian J Reich
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Selecting optimal treatment in clinical trials using covariate information.

Authors:  D P Byar; D K Corle
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1977-07

3.  Major outcomes in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin vs usual care: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.

Authors:  S F Assmann; S J Pocock; L E Enos; L E Kasten
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness.

Authors:  M Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  1967-12

6.  Interaction between prognostic factors and treatment.

Authors:  J Shuster; J van Eys
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1983-09

7.  Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  S Yusuf; J Wittes; J Probstfield; H A Tyroler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-07-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A comparison of nefazodone, the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination for the treatment of chronic depression.

Authors:  M B Keller; J P McCullough; D N Klein; B Arnow; D L Dunner; A J Gelenberg; J C Markowitz; C B Nemeroff; J M Russell; M E Thase; M H Trivedi; J Zajecka
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets.

Authors:  M Gail; R Simon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The Beta-Blocker Pooling Project (BBPP): subgroup findings from randomized trials in post infarction patients. The Beta-Blocker Pooling Project Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  23 in total

1.  Optimizing delivery of a behavioral pain intervention in cancer patients using a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial SMART.

Authors:  Sarah A Kelleher; Caroline S Dorfman; Jen C Plumb Vilardaga; Catherine Majestic; Joseph Winger; Vicky Gandhi; Christine Nunez; Alyssa Van Denburg; Rebecca A Shelby; Shelby D Reed; Susan Murphy; Marie Davidian; Eric B Laber; Gretchen G Kimmick; Kelly W Westbrook; Amy P Abernethy; Tamara J Somers
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  On Bayesian methods of exploring qualitative interactions for targeted treatment.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Debashis Ghosh; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Maxim Norkin; Daniel J Sargent; Gerold Bepler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Sequential advantage selection for optimal treatment regime.

Authors:  Ailin Fan; Wenbin Lu; Rui Song
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Residual Weighted Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Umer Khan; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions.

Authors:  Inbal Nahum-Shani; Min Qian; Daniel Almirall; William E Pelham; Beth Gnagy; Gregory A Fabiano; James G Waxmonsky; Jihnhee Yu; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-10-01

6.  Q-learning: a data analysis method for constructing adaptive interventions.

Authors:  Inbal Nahum-Shani; Min Qian; Daniel Almirall; William E Pelham; Beth Gnagy; Gregory A Fabiano; James G Waxmonsky; Jihnhee Yu; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-10-01

7.  ON TESTING CONDITIONAL QUALITATIVE TREATMENT EFFECTS.

Authors:  Chengchun Shi; Rui Song; Wenbin Lu
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.028

8.  Robust learning for optimal treatment decision with NP-dimensionality.

Authors:  Chengchun Shi; Rui Song; Wenbin Lu
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.125

9.  Single index methods for evaluation of marker-guided treatment rules based on multivariate marker panels.

Authors:  Veronika Skrivankova; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Variable selection for optimal treatment decision.

Authors:  Wenbin Lu; Hao Helen Zhang; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.