Literature DB >> 31833561

Learning-based biomarker-assisted rules for optimized clinical benefit under a risk constraint.

Yanqing Wang1, Ying-Qi Zhao2, Yingye Zheng2.   

Abstract

Novel biomarkers, in combination with currently available clinical information, have been sought to improve clinical decision making in many branches of medicine, including screening, surveillance, and prognosis. Statistical methods are needed to integrate such diverse information to develop targeted interventions that balance benefit and harm. In the specific setting of disease detection, we propose novel approaches to construct a multiple-marker-based decision rule by directly optimizing a benefit function, while controlling harm at a maximally tolerable level. These new approaches include plug-in and direct-optimization-based algorithms, and they allow for the construction of both nonparametric and parametric rules. A study of asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators is provided. Simulation results demonstrate good clinical utilities for the resulting decision rules under various scenarios. The methods are applied to a biomarker study in prostate cancer surveillance.
© 2019 The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; clinical decision rules; false positive fraction; machine learning; true positive fraction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31833561      PMCID: PMC7292743          DOI: 10.1111/biom.13199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  15 in total

1.  Combining multiple markers for classification using ROC.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Combining predictors for classification using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Tianxi Cai; Gary Longton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Set-valued dynamic treatment regimes for competing outcomes.

Authors:  Eric B Laber; Daniel J Lizotte; Bradley Ferguson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A general statistical framework for subgroup identification and comparative treatment scoring.

Authors:  Shuai Chen; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Menggang Yu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4Kscore accurately identifies men with high-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dipen J Parekh; Sanoj Punnen; Daniel D Sjoberg; Scott W Asroff; James L Bailen; James S Cochran; Raoul Concepcion; Richard D David; Kenneth B Deck; Igor Dumbadze; Michael Gambla; Michael S Grable; Ralph J Henderson; Lawrence Karsh; Evan B Krisch; Timothy D Langford; Daniel W Lin; Shawn M McGee; John J Munoz; Christopher M Pieczonka; Kimberley Rieger-Christ; Daniel R Saltzstein; John W Scott; Neal D Shore; Paul R Sieber; Todd M Waldmann; Fredrick N Wolk; Stephen M Zappala
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Identifying combinations of cancer markers for further study as triggers of early intervention.

Authors:  S G Baker
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study: design of a multi-institutional active surveillance cohort and biorepository.

Authors:  Lisa F Newcomb; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; Ziding Feng; Martin E Gleave; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Optimal Individualized Treatments in Resource-Limited Settings.

Authors:  Alexander R Luedtke; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 0.968

9.  Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning.

Authors:  Yingqi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; A John Rush; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Estimation and evaluation of linear individualized treatment rules to guarantee performance.

Authors:  Xin Qiu; Donglin Zeng; Yuanjia Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  1 in total

1.  Shared decision making of burdensome surveillance tests using personalized schedules and their burden and benefit.

Authors:  Anirudh Tomer; Daan Nieboer; Monique J Roobol; Ewout W Steyerberg; Dimitris Rizopoulos
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.