Literature DB >> 29534296

Estimating individualized treatment rules for ordinal treatments.

Jingxiang Chen1, Haoda Fu2, Xuanyao He2, Michael R Kosorok1,3, Yufeng Liu1,3,4.   

Abstract

Precision medicine is an emerging scientific topic for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual patient characteristics. It is an important direction for clinical research, and many statistical methods have been proposed recently. One of the primary goals of precision medicine is to obtain an optimal individual treatment rule (ITR), which can help make decisions on treatment selection according to each patient's specific characteristics. Recently, outcome weighted learning (OWL) has been proposed to estimate such an optimal ITR in a binary treatment setting by maximizing the expected clinical outcome. However, for ordinal treatment settings, such as individualized dose finding, it is unclear how to use OWL. In this article, we propose a new technique for estimating ITR with ordinal treatments. In particular, we propose a data duplication technique with a piecewise convex loss function. We establish Fisher consistency for the resulting estimated ITR under certain conditions, and obtain the convergence and risk bound properties. Simulated examples and an application to a dataset from a type 2 diabetes mellitus observational study demonstrate the highly competitive performance of the proposed method compared to existing alternatives.
© 2018, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data duplication; Individual treatment rule; Optimal individual dose finding; Ordinal treatment; Outcome weighted learning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29534296      PMCID: PMC6136994          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  14 in total

1.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies.

Authors:  James Robins; Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Residual Weighted Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Umer Khan; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  EFFECTIVELY SELECTING A TARGET POPULATION FOR A FUTURE COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Authors:  Lihui Zhao; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Brian Claggett; L J Wei
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

5.  Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects.

Authors:  Yaoyao Xu; Menggang Yu; Ying-Qi Zhao; Quefeng Li; Sijian Wang; Jun Shao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Eric B Laber; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Personalized Dose Finding Using Outcome Weighted Learning.

Authors:  Guanhua Chen; Donglin Zeng; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Breast cancer in the personal genomics era.

Authors:  Rachel E Ellsworth; David J Decewicz; Craig D Shriver; Darrell L Ellsworth
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Rury R Holman; Kerensa I Thorne; Andrew J Farmer; Melanie J Davies; Joanne F Keenan; Sanjoy Paul; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

Authors:  Emily Herrett; Arlene M Gallagher; Krishnan Bhaskaran; Harriet Forbes; Rohini Mathur; Tjeerd van Staa; Liam Smeeth
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  6 in total

1.  Estimating individualized treatment regimes from crossover designs.

Authors:  Crystal T Nguyen; Daniel J Luckett; Anna R Kahkoska; Grace E Shearrer; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jaimie N Davis; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Personalized treatment selection using data from crossover designs with carry-over effects.

Authors:  Chathura Siriwardhana; K B Kulasekera; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Michael R Kosorok; Eric B Laber
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Prospects and challenges for clinical decision support in the era of big data.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Michael R Kosorok; Judy Jin; Michelle Mierzwa; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-11-09

5.  Estimating the optimal individualized treatment rule from a cost-effectiveness perspective.

Authors:  Yizhe Xu; Tom H Greene; Adam P Bress; Brian C Sauer; Brandon K Bellows; Yue Zhang; William S Weintraub; Andrew E Moran; Jincheng Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Near-optimal Individualized Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Haomiao Meng; Ying-Qi Zhao; Haoda Fu; Xingye Qiao
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.177

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.