| Literature DB >> 28936234 |
Sofia Esquivel-Elizondo1,2, Anca G Delgado1,2, Bruce E Rittmann1,2, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Syngas fermentation, the bioconversion of CO, CO2, and H2 to biofuels and chemicals, has undergone considerable optimization for industrial applications. Even more, full-scale plants for ethanol production from syngas fermentation by pure cultures are being built worldwide. The composition of syngas depends on the feedstock gasified and the gasification conditions. However, it remains unclear how different syngas mixtures affect the metabolism of carboxidotrophs, including the ethanol/acetate ratios. In addition, the potential application of mixed cultures in syngas fermentation and their advantages over pure cultures have not been deeply explored. In this work, the effects of CO2 and H2 on the CO metabolism by pure and mixed cultures were studied and compared. For this, a CO-enriched mixed culture and two isolated carboxidotrophs were grown with different combinations of syngas components (CO, CO:H2, CO:CO2, or CO:CO2:H2).Entities:
Keywords: Acetobacterium; Bioethanol; CO-enriched mixed culture; Carbon monoxide; Geosporobacter; Pleomorphomonas; Syngas
Year: 2017 PMID: 28936234 PMCID: PMC5603099 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0910-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Stoichiometric reactions for microbial conversion of CO and syngas to acetic acid and ethanol
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| CO + H2O → H2 + CO2 | − 10 | Equation 1 |
| 4CO + 2H2O → CH3COOH + 2CO2 | − 19.6 | Equation 2 |
| 6CO + 3H2O → CH3CH2OH + 4CO2 | − 18.6 | Equation 3 |
| 2CO + 2H2 → CH3COOH | − 14.7 | Equation 4 |
| 2CO + 4H2 → CH3CH2OH + H2O | − 18.0 | Equation 5 |
| 4H2 + 2CO2 → CH3COOH + 2H2O | − 9.7 | Equation 6 |
| 6H2 + 2CO2 → CH3CH2OH + 3H2O | − 8.7 | Equation 7 |
e− eq., electron equivalents
aCalculated from free energies of formation at 25 °C, pH = 7.0, and electron equivalency of moles of electron donor (i.e., CO and/or H2) reported in (Rittmann and McCarty [46])
Fig. 1Fermentation of (a–d) CO, and (e–h) CO: CO2: H2 by the mixed and pure CO-consuming cultures. Panels d and h show that no CO, H2, or CO2 was abiotically consumed. The initial CO partial pressure was 30.4 kPa. The data are averages of triplicates; error bars indicate one standard deviation
Fig. 2Fermentation of (a–c) CO: H2 and (d–f) CO: CO2 by the mixed and pure CO-consuming cultures. The initial partial pressure of CO was 30.4 kPa. The data are averages of triplicates; error bars indicate one standard deviation
Electron equivalents in substrates and products, along with ethanol-to-acetate ratios, in the fermentation of CO and CO with H2 and/or CO2 by the CO-consuming cultures
| CO-consuming culture | Gas mixture | Initial PCO, kPa | Initial PCO2, kPa | Initial PH2, kPa | Electrons in susbtrate*, e− meq. | Initial C:e− ratio, mmol/e− meq. | H2, e− meq. | Ethanol/acetate, e− meq./e− meq. | CO consumption rate**, mmol CO L−1 day−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO-enriched mixed culture | CO | 0a | 0 | 0 | 21.0b | – | 0.1 | 0.12 - 0.3 | 3.4 |
| 48.2c | – | 0 | –d | 7.1 | |||||
| 31.4 | 0 | 0 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 3.5 | ||
| CO: H2 | 31.4 | 0 | 96.2 | 9.4 ± 0.3 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 2.4 | |
| CO: CO2 | 32.4 | 32.4 | 0 | 4.1 ± 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 2.5 | |
| CO: CO2: H2 | 32.4 | 15.2 | 16.2 | 6.7 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 2.1 | |
|
| CO | 30.4 | 0 | 0 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 14.2 ± 5.2 | 1.4 |
| CO:YE | 30.4 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.01 | 400 ± 133.3 | 1.8 | |
| CO:H2 | 30.4 | 0 | 92.2 | 9.4 ± 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 11.2 ± 0.5 | 0.7 | |
| CO:CO2 | 30.4 | 31.4 | 0 | 4.1 ± 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.86 ± 0.01 | 1.4 | |
| CO:CO2:H2 | 31.4 | 15.2 | 17.2 | 5.8 | 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.25 | 5.0 | |
|
| CO | 31.4 | 0 | 0 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | – | 1.0 |
| CO: YE | 29.4 | 0 | 0 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | – | 1.3 | |
| CO: H2 | 30.4 | 0 | 95.2 | 9.4 ± 0.3 | 0.2 | 7.1 ± 0.15 | – | 0.7 | |
| CO: CO2 | 28.4 | 30.4 | 0 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | – | 0.0 | |
| CO: CO2:H2 | 30.4 | 15.2 | 18.2 | 3.4 ± 0.04 | 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | – | 1.1 |
* Electrons added as CO and/or H2, and organic matter (i.e., fatty acids in inoculum)
** Maximum rates achieved during exponential CO consumption in serum bottles, and estimated rates in the batch reactor
aInitial PCO in batch reactor with continuous CO supply is 0 kPa, since CO gradually diffuses through the membranes, and only CO not consumed by the biofilm formed on the membranes ends in the headspace of the reactor
bAfter 55 days of fermentation, at PCO = 12.16 kPa
cAfter 61 days of fermentation, at PCO = 4.05 kPa
dNo acetate detected, and 69.5 ± 3.1 mM (40.6 e− meq.) of ethanol produced
Fig. 3Electron distribution (%) from electron donorsa to acetate, ethanol, and/or H2 produced in fermentation of CO and mixtures of CO with CO2 and/or H2 by (a) the CO-enriched mixed culture, (b) the Acetobacterium-like isolate, and (c) the Pleomorphomonas-like isolate. The data are averages with standard deviation of triplicates. The electron balance in (a) corresponds to day 21, and in (b, c) to the last day of fermentation. aCO, H2, and/or yeast extract (YE), and initial concentration of organic matter. *Distribution of electrons to H2 includes H2 produced and not consumed. e− meq.: electron milliequivalent
Fig. 4Fermentation of CO in a batch membrane reactor with continuous CO supply in phosphate-buffered medium. a H2, CO2, and CO measured in the headspace, and acetate and ethanol concentrations in the liquid phase. b pH values over time. c Relative abundance of main phylotypes detected during fermentation. The data in a, b are averages of at least two measurements