Literature DB >> 28917400

Visual quality and performance comparison between 2 refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses.

Richard N McNeely1, Eric Pazo1, Andrew Spence1, Olivier Richoz1, M Andrew Nesbit1, Tara C B Moore1, Jonathan E Moore2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the 12-month postoperative quality of vision and visual performance of 2 different refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).
SETTING: Cathedral Eye Clinic, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Refractive lens exchange (RLE) patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised eyes receiving a Lentis Mplus LS-312 MF30 IOL and Group B, eyes receiving a Lenstec SBL-3 IOL. Refraction, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities, uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuities, distance-corrected intermediate and near (DCNVA) visual acuities, and quality of vision were evaluated preoperatively and up to 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Each group comprised 90 eyes. Both groups had a high level of quality of vision 12 months postoperatively with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .919). There was no significant between-group difference in mean monocular and binocular UDVA, monocular UIVA, or monocular UNVA. Group B had statistically significantly better mean monocular DCNVA (P = .049), binocular UNVA (P = .011), and binocular DCNVA (P = .035). Group B had a higher percentage of complete spectacle independence.
CONCLUSIONS: Both refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs provided an excellent level of quality of vision 12 months postoperatively. Both IOL models restored distance, intermediate, and near visual function; however the IOLs in Group B provided better near visual performance.
Copyright © 2017 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28917400     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.05.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  13 in total

1.  Accuracy of eight intraocular lens power calculation formulas for segmented multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Liang-Ping Liu; Huan-Huan Cheng; Jian-Bing Li; Xiao-Tong Han; Yu Liu; Ming-Xing Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Model of the light sword intraocular lens: in-vitro comparative studies.

Authors:  Krzysztof Petelczyc; Andrzej Kolodziejczyk; Narcyz Błocki; Anna Byszewska; Zbigniew Jaroszewicz; Karol Kakarenko; Katarzyna Kołacz; Michał Miler; Alejandro Mira-Agudelo; Walter Torres-Sepúlveda; Marek Rękas
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Comparison of visual outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and a refractive bifocal intraocular lens in eyes with axial myopia: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tong Sun; Yiyun Liu; Yufei Gao; Chuhao Tang; Qianqian Lan; Tingting Yang; Xiaorui Zhao; Hong Qi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  A comparative study on early vision quality after implantation of refractive segmental and diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Huifang Lian; Weisong Ma; Qiuhong Wei; Xiaoyong Yuan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 5.  Continuous Transitional Focus (CTF): A New Concept in Ophthalmic Surgery.

Authors:  Ramón Ruiz Mesa; Tiago Monteiro
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-06-18

6.  Comparison of the visual performance between Oculentis MF30 and Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Lingying Ye; Tianyu Chen; Zhixiang Hu; Qingwen Yang; Qiudong Su; Jin Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

7.  Nd:YAG Capsulotomy Rates with Two Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Huiran Bai; Honglei Li; Simeng Zheng; Lihong Sun; Xiaoming Wu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-11-30

8.  Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction 1 and 12 months after combined implantation of extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Richard N McNeely; Salissou Moutari; Stephen Stewart; Jonathan E Moore
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Visual Performance Following Bilateral Implantation of Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Bifocal Intraocular Lens (LS-313 MF30) or Apodized Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens (ReSTOR SN6AD1).

Authors:  Honglei Li; Dongle Liu; Han Gao; Jiajun Sun; Huiran Bai; Xiaoming Wu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Optical Quality with a Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens and an Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Haixia Tu; Yong Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.