| Literature DB >> 28912830 |
Huifang Xu1,2, Linlin Ning1,2,3, Wenxia Yang1,2, Bo Fang1,2, Cong Wang1,2, Yun Wang2,4, Jian Xu2,4, Severine Collin5, Frederic Laeuffer5, Laurent Fourage5, Shengying Li1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: P450 fatty acid decarboxylases represented by the unusual CYP152 peroxygenase family member OleTJE have been receiving great attention recently since these P450 enzymes are able to catalyze the simple and direct production of 1-alkenes for potential applications in biofuels and biomaterials. To gain more mechanistic insights, broader substrate spectra, and improved decarboxylative activities, it is demanded to discover and investigate more P450 fatty acid decarboxylases.Entities:
Keywords: Alkenes; Biofuels; Chemoselectivity; Enzyme kinetics; P450 fatty acid decarboxylases; Site-directed mutagenesis; Substrate specificity
Year: 2017 PMID: 28912830 PMCID: PMC5588734 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0894-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Scheme 1Fatty acid decarboxylation and hydroxylation catalyzed by CYP152 peroxygenases
Fig. 1UV–visible spectra of CYP-Aa162 (a) and CYP-Sm46Δ29 (b). The purified enzymes were diluted in 50 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 7.4) containing 300 mM NaCl and 10% glycerol, respectively. Spectra are shown for the oxidized ferric form of the CYPs (solid lines) and the Na2S2O4-reduced ferrous-CO complex of the CYPs (dashed lines). Insets show the reduced CO difference spectrum of each enzyme
Fig. 2UV–visible spectra and lauric acid (LA) conversion activity of CYP-Aa162 and CYP-Sm46Δ29 in the O2/redox partners/NAD(P)H system. a The UV–visible spectra are, respectively, shown for the substrate LA-bound ferric form of CYP-Sm46Δ29 with a Soret band at 422 nm (solid line); the CamAB/NADH ‘reduced’ CO-bound form of CYP-Sm46Δ29 with the Soret peak still at ~422 nm (dashed line); the substrate LA-bound ferric form of CYP-Aa162 with a Soret band at ~418 nm (dashed and dotted line); the CamAB/NADH ‘reduced’ CO-bound form of CYP-Aa162 with an unshifted Soret peak (dotted line). b Enzymatic conversion of lauric acid by CYP-Aa162, CYP-Sm46Δ29, and the control P450BM3 monooxygenase in the O2/redox proteins/NAD(P)H system in the absence or presence of different concentrations of catalase. For CYP-Aa162 and CYP-Sm46Δ29, CamAB/NADH was used for the electron transfer cascade. For the self-sufficient P450BM3 enzyme, NADPH was used as the electron donor. Conversions of the substrate in the H2O2 cofactor system were included as controls
Fig. 3Substrate preference and 1-alkene production profiles of CYP-Aa162 (a) and CYP-Sm46Δ29 (b). Substrate preference was determined by calculating the percentage conversion of each fatty acid substrate. The corresponding 1-alkene production represents the percentage of 1-alkene yield over the starting substrate. Results shown are mean ± SD of duplicated experiments
Fig. 4Decarboxylation (DC) versus hydroxylation (HD) activities of CYP-Aa162 and P450BSβ. The hydroxylation activity was estimated by subtracting the alkene production from the total substrate conversion. This indirect but more convenient method was validated with C14 myristic acid substrate by direct measurement of its derivatized hydroxylation products. Results are shown as mean ± SD of duplicated experiments
GC–MS analysis of catalytic activities and product distribution profiles of the selected CYP152 peroxygenases towards myristic acid (C14)
| Enzymes | Conversion (%) | Product distribution (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-tridecene | α-OH–C14 | β-OH–C14 | ||
| CYP-Aa162 | 60.1 ± 2.1 | 16.0 ± 1.2 | 78.9 ± 1.4 | 5.1 ± 0.6 |
| P450BSβ | 62.8 ± 5.0 | 36.8 ± 3.5 | 30.0 ± 4.2 | 33.2 ± 3.5 |
| CYP-Sm46Δ29 | 73.2 ± 8.9 | 78.4 ± 2.9 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 21.2 ± 0.9 |
| OleTJE | 74.2 ± 2.9 | 91.8 ± 5.9 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 7.9 ± 1.5 |
Fig. 5Fatty acid conversion by the Aa162/Q85H/V170I and P450Bsβ/Q85H/V170I mutants compared to their corresponding wild-type enzymes. The hydroxylation (HD) activity was deduced by subtracting the 1-alkene production (corresponding to DC activity) from the total substrate conversion. a Lauric acid (LA) conversion and 1-undecene (1-UE) production; b palmitic acid (PA) conversion and 1-pentadecene (1-PE) production; c conversion ratios of different carbon chain length fatty acids (C10–C20) and d their corresponding 1-alkene production by the indicated enzymes. Results are presented as mean ± SD of duplicated experiments
Kinetic parameters of FFA conversion catalyzed by CYP-Aa162 and CYP-Sm46Δ29
| Enzymes | C12a | C14b | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Hill coefficient (n) |
|
|
| |
| CYP-Aa162c | 46.1 ± 17.1 | 93.1 ± 37.7 | 0.5 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | nd | nd | nd |
| CYP-Sm46Δ29d | 24.5 ± 6.3 | 58.4 ± 19.0 | 0.4 | 2.2 ± 1.0 | 62.5 ± 4.5 | 41.3 ± 5.1 | 1.5 |
nd not determined
aData were fitted to Hill equation ( n Hill coefficient)
bSubstantial substrate inhibition was observed with this substrate. Data shown here were derived from Michaelis–Menten equation after omitting the inhibited rates at high substrate concentrations
cInitial rates were measured by the amount of substrate consumption per μM enzyme per min
dInitial rates were measured by the amount of 1-alkene formation per μM enzyme per min. Data (shown as mean ± SE) were calculated using OriginPro 8.0 program