| Literature DB >> 28911662 |
Tun-Pin Hsueh1,2, Wan-Ling Lin3, Tung-Hu Tsai1,4,5.
Abstract
Chronic liver disease is a serious global health problem, and an increasing number of patients are seeking alternative medicines or complementary treatment. Herbal medicines account for 16.8% of patients with chronic liver disease who use complementary and alternative therapies. A survey of the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan reported that Long-Dan-Xie-Gan-Tang, Jia-Wei-Xia-Yao-San, and Xiao-Chai-Hu-Tang (Sho-saiko-to) were the most frequent formula prescriptions for chronic hepatitis used by traditional Chinese medicine physicians. Bioanalytical methods of herbal medicines for the treatment of chronic hepatitis were developed to investigate pharmacokinetics properties, but multicomponent herbal formulas have been seldom discussed. The pharmacokinetics of herbal formulas is closely related to efficacy, efficiency, and patient safety of traditional herbal medicines. Potential herbal formula-drug interactions are another essential issue during herbal formula administration in chronic hepatitis patients. In a survey with the PubMed database, this review article evaluates the existing evidence-based data associated with the documented pharmacokinetics profiles and potential herbal-drug interactions of herbal formulas for the treatment of chronic hepatitis. In addition, the existing pharmacokinetic profiles were further linked with clinical practice to provide insight for the safety and specific use of traditional herbal medicines.Entities:
Keywords: National Health Insurance Research Database; chronic hepatitis; herbal medicine; lamivudine; pharmacokinetics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28911662 PMCID: PMC9332521 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.11.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Drug Anal Impact factor: 6.157
Figure 1Typical plasma concentration versus time profiles after oral administration. AUC =area under the curve; Cmax = maximum plasma concentration; MEC = minimum effective concentration; MTC = maximum toxic concentration; t1/2 = half-life; Tmax = time to Cmax.
Interaction effects of drugs with herbal formula for chronic liver disease on pharmacokinetic parameters.
| Drugs (dose) | Lamivudine (30 mg/kg, i.v.) [ | 5-FU (100 mg/kg, i.v.) [ | Etizolam (10 mg/kg, p.o.) [ | Carbamazepine (50 mg/kg, p.o.) [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreated herbs (dose) | LDXGT (1.23 g/kg) | JWXYS (2.4 g/kg/d) | KSS (1 g/kg) | TJ-9 (1 g/kg) |
| 87.8 ( | 107 ( | 0.651 | ↓ 11.5 | |
| — | — | 11.9 | 180 | |
| 7.74 and 49.2 | ↑ 25.6 (↑ brain 47.2) | 44.9 | 192 | |
| AUC (min μg/mL) | 1449 | 6159 | 30.5 | 5136 (↓CBZ-E 4050) |
| Cl (mL/min/kg) | 21.2 | 17.6 (↓brain 82.9) | na | na |
| ↑ 718 | ↑ 575 | na | na | |
| Notes | Possible affect drug-metabolizing genes | Possible inhibit P-glycoprotein | Possible reduce carbamazepine absorption |
Data are expressed as mean value. The arrow signs in the table indicate increase or decrease when combined with herbal medicine compared to the drug alone.
5-FU = 5-fluorouracil; AUC = area under the curve; CBZ-E = carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide; Cl = clearance; Cmax = maximum plasma concentration; JWXYS = Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San; KSS = Kamisyoyosan; LDXGT = Long-Dan-Xie-Gan-Tang; na = data not available; TJ-9 = Sho-saiko-to; t1/2, half-life; Tmax = time to Cmax; Vd = volume distribution.