| Literature DB >> 30360359 |
Tun-Pin Hsueh1,2, Tung-Hu Tsai3,4,5,6.
Abstract
The herbal formula Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang has been reported to have anti-fibrosis properties. The aim of this study was to reveal the pharmacokinetic characteristics of bioactive compounds in this herbal formula. A new high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of scoparone, geniposide and rhein in rat plasma. A pharmaceutical herbal powder was administered to rats at doses of 1 g/kg and 3 g/kg orally. The method showed excellent linearity (r² > 0.999) and validation was successfully conducted for the pharmacokinetic study. The results show that the Cmax values and areas under the curve of scoparone, geniposide and rhein were higher and not proportional to the dose in rat plasma, while the Tmax and half-life values were consistent in the group that received 1 g/kg. The clearance of the higher dose (3 g/kg) did not decrease proportionally to that of the low dose. The results showed the nonlinear pharmacokinetic properties of scoparone, geniposide and rhein in Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang that suggested possible accumulation of bioactive compounds through oral administration. This pharmacokinetic study reveals that an increased dose of this herbal formula would largely increase the maximum concentration and bioavailability of scoparone, geniposide and rhein.Entities:
Keywords: Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang; geniposide; herbal medicine; rhein; scoparone; tandem mass spectrometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30360359 PMCID: PMC6222633 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1ESI-MS/MS spectra of bioactive constituents of the Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang formula and the internal standard. Scoparone (M + H)+, geniposide (M + NH4)+ and carbamazepine (M + H)+ spectra are obtained using ESI+ while rhein (M − H)− was in ESI−.
The LC-MS/MS analytical conditions for the identification of the bioactive constituents.
| Constituents | Molecular Weight | RT 1 (min) | Selected | Collision Energy (eV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q3 | ||||
| Scoparone | 206.57 | 5.3 | 207 | 151 | −22 |
| Geniposide | 388.14 | 4.7 | 406 | 227 | −10 |
| Rhein | 284.03 | 6.9 | 283 | 239 | 14 |
| Carbamazepine | 236.10 | 5.8 | 237 | 194 | −20 |
1 RT: retention time.
Figure 2Typical MRM chromatograms of plasma samples collected 180 min after oral administration of the herbal formula Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang (3 g/kg): (a) scoparone (6.2 ng/mL) RT: 5.6 min, (b) geniposide (287.4 ng/mL) RT: 5.1 min, (c) rhein (350.3 ng/mL) RT: 7.4 min and (d) internal standard: Carbamazepine (10 ng/mL) RT: 6.2 min.
Calibration curve of scoparone, geniposide and rhein.
| Constituents | Calibration Curve | Range (ng/mL) | R2 | LOD (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scoparone | y = 0.0195x − 0.0136 | 5–500 | 0.9999 | 1 |
| Geniposide | y = 0.0075x − 0.0066 | 10–1000 | 0.9998 | 5 |
| Rhein | y = 0.007x − 0.001 | 10–1000 | 0.9999 | 5 |
Intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy of scoparone, geniposide and rhein in plasma samples.
| Nominal Concentration (ng/mL) | Observed Concentration (ng/mL) 1 | Precision (%) | Accuracy (%) | Observed Concentration (ng/mL) 1 | Precision (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-Day | Inter-Day | |||||
| Scoparone | ||||||
| 5 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| 10 | 10.6 ± 0.8 | 7.9 | 5.6 | 10.0 ± 0.4 | 4.1 | 0.2 |
| 50 | 49.9 ± 1.2 | 2.4 | −0.2 | 48.1 ± 1.3 | 2.7 | −3.7 |
| 100 | 99.9 ± 0.7 | 0.7 | −0.1 | 100.4 ± 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.4 |
| 500 | 500.3 ± 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 499.4 ± 8.3 | 1.7 | −0.1 |
| Geniposide | ||||||
| 10 | 10.7 ± 0.7 | 6.9 | 7.2 | 10.7 ± 0.4 | 3.6 | 6.6 |
| 50 | 49.7 ± 0.9 | 1.8 | −0.7 | 50.6 ± 2.5 | 5.0 | 1.2 |
| 100 | 99.6 ± 1.4 | 1.4 | −0.5 | 100.0 ± 3.0 | 3.0 | −0.1 |
| 500 | 500.7 ± 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 505.2 ± 5.9 | 1.2 | 5.2 |
| 1000 | 999.3 ± 1.8 | 0.2 | −0.1 | 1014.1 ± 31.6 | 3.1 | 1.4 |
| Rhein | ||||||
| 10 | 9.8 ± 0.7 | 6.8 | −2.3 | 9.8 ± 0.2 | 1.6 | −1.7 |
| 50 | 48.8 ± 0.7 | 1.4 | −2.4 | 49.4 ± 0.9 | 1.7 | −1.1 |
| 100 | 100.0 ± 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 97.0 ± 1.7 | 1.8 | −3.0 |
| 500 | 502.4 ± 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 489.2 ± 10.6 | 2.2 | −2.2 |
| 1000 | 998.5 ± 2.5 | 0.3 | −0.2 | 988.1 ± 30.4 | 3.1 | −1.2 |
1 Data are expressed as the means ± S.D. (n = 6). Precision: RSD (%) = (standard deviation/Cobs) × 100; Accuracy: Bias (%) = [(Cobs − Cnom)/Cnom] × 100.
Extraction recovery and matrix effect of the marker constituents.
| Nominal Conc. (ng/mL) | R 1 | R 2 | R 3 | ME (%) 1 | RE (%) 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scoparone | |||||
| 10 | 44,912 ± 1152 | 48,721 ± 2536 | 41,883 ± 1236 | 113.0 ± 16.7 | 99.8 ± 13.1 |
| 100 | 427,813 ± 14,929 | 478,693 ± 2688 | 424,339 ± 15,638 | 109.5 ± 2.0 | 99.5 ± 3.5 |
| 1000 | 4,400,014 ± 56,880 | 4,332,780 ± 178,478 | 3,636,719 ± 220,707 | 97.5 ± 1.5 | 99.7 ± 5.2 |
| mean ± SD | 106.7 ± 6.7 | 99.7 ± 7.2 | |||
| Geniposide | |||||
| 10 | 4690 ± 482 | 7474 ± 582 | 5863 ± 412 | 167.7 ± 34.5 | 91.2 ± 10.6 |
| 100 | 49,536 ± 2178 | 67,386 ± 1831 | 54,524 ± 2940 | 133.5 ± 11.3 | 90.9 ± 7.1 |
| 1000 | 649,073 ± 7233 | 771,802 ± 15,246 | 607,190 ± 24,396 | 117.9 ± 5.9 | 93.5 ± 3.5 |
| mean ± SD | 139.7 ± 17.2 | 91.9 ± 7.1 | |||
| Rhein | |||||
| 50 | 15,161 ± 597 | 12,484 ± 309 | 12,858 ± 653 | 85.1 ± 5.2 | 121.5 ± 11.1 |
| 100 | 27,608 ± 879 | 24,708 ± 1230 | 23,412 ± 1000 | 87.6 ± 3.7 | 106.5 ± 5.8 |
| 1000 | 330,092 ± 2490 | 285,450 ± 3193 | 241,434 ± 977 | 85.8 ± 5.1 | 100.5 ± 2.0 |
| mean ± SD | 86.2 ± 4.7 | 109.5 ± 6.3 | |||
| Carbamazepine (IS) | |||||
| 10 | 289,244 ± 6018 | 282,335 ± 3741 | 244,125 ± 3117 | 99.9 ± 2.9 | 85.7 ± 5.2 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). 1 ME: Matrix effect (%) calculated as (R 2/R 1) × 100%. 2 RE: Recovery (%) calculated as (R 3/R 2) × 100%.
Figure 3Concentration-time profile of scoparone in rat plasma following oral administration of different dose of herbal formula (1 g/kg p.o. or 3 g/kg p.o. Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang).
Figure 4Concentration-time profile of geniposide in rat plasma following oral administration of different dose of herbal formula (1 g/kg p.o. or 3 g/kg p.o. Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang).
Figure 5Concentration-time profile of rhein in rat plasma following oral administration of different dose of herbal formula (1 g/kg p.o. or 3 g/kg p.o. Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang).
Pharmacokinetic parameters of scoparone, geniposide and rhein in rat plasma after administration of the herbal formula Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang.
| Parameters | YCHT 1 g/kg | YCHT 3 g/kg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scoparone | Geniposide | Rhein | Scoparone | Geniposide | Rhein | |
| Cmax (μg/mL) | 0.018 ± 0.012 | 0.145 ± 0.251 | 0.311 ± 0.166 | 0.132 ± 0.137 * | 0.604 ± 0.256 ** | 1.659 ± 0.805 ** |
| Tmax (min) | 14 ± 20 | 81 ± 71 | 12 ± 5 | 21 ± 20 | 81 ± 77 | 23 ± 19 |
| AUC (min μg/mL) | 0.955 ± 1.168 | 18.76 ± 28.45 | 29.11 ± 13.13 | 7.123 ± 3.379 ** | 94.88 ± 32.28 ** | 198.5 ± 51.3 ** |
| AUC/dose | - | - | - | 2.374 ± 1.126 | 31.63 ± 10.76 | 66.18 ± 17.09 |
| t1/2 (min) | 26 ± 5 | 80 ± 18 | 121 ± 46 | 69 ± 55 | 86 ± 29 | 104 ± 69 |
| CL (mL/min/kg) | 394.7 ± 209.4 | 1403 ± 1018 | 3.710 ± 1.366 | 131.5 ± 123.6 * | 259.8 ± 109.2 * | 1.483 ± 0.357 ** |
| MRT (min) | 19 ± 14 | 115 ± 31 | 106 ± 12 | 51 ± 18 ** | 152 ± 20 * | 116 ± 20 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± S.D. (n = 6). T-test was significant: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. YCHT, Chinese herbal formula Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang; Cmax = Maximum concentration; Tmax = Time of maximum concentration; AUC = Area under the curve; t1/2 = Elimination half-life; CL = clearance; MRT = mean retention time.