Literature DB >> 18775967

In vivo cartilage contact deformation in the healthy human tibiofemoral joint.

J T Bingham1, R Papannagari, S K Van de Velde, C Gross, T J Gill, D T Felson, H E Rubash, G Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In vivo cartilage contact deformation is instrumental for understanding human joint function and degeneration. This study measured the total deformation of contacting articular cartilage in the human tibiofemoral joint during in vivo weight-bearing flexion.
METHODS: Eleven healthy knees were magnetic resonance (MR) scanned and imaged with a dual fluoroscopic system while the subject performed a weight-bearing single-leg lunge. The tibia, femur and associated articulating cartilage were constructed from the MR images and combined with the dual fluoroscopic images to determine in vivo cartilage contact deformation from full extension to 120 degrees of flexion.
RESULTS: In both compartments, minimum peak compartmental contact deformation occurred at 30 degrees of flexion (24 +/- 6% medial, 17 +/- 7% lateral) and maximum peak compartmental deformation occurred at 120 degrees of flexion (30 +/- 13% medial, 30 +/- 10% lateral) during the weight-bearing flexion from full extension to 120 degrees. Average medial contact areas and peak contact deformations were significantly greater than lateral compartment values (P < 0.05). In addition, cartilage thickness in regions of contact was on average 1.4- and 1.1-times thicker than the average thickness of the tibial and femoral cartilage surfaces, respectively (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: These data may provide base-line knowledge for investigating the effects of various knee injuries on joint contact biomechanics and the aetiology of cartilage degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18775967      PMCID: PMC2569133          DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  51 in total

1.  MR assessment of movement and morphologic change in the menisci during knee flexion.

Authors:  Y Kawahara; M Uetani; K Fuchi; H Eguchi; K Hayashi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  In vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics using a biplanar image-matching technique.

Authors:  T Asano; M Akagi; K Tanaka; J Tamura; T Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Tibiofemoral contact points relative to flexion angle measured with MRI.

Authors:  Per Wretenberg; Dan K Ramsey; Gunnar Németh
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  The cartilage thickness distribution in the tibiofemoral joint and its correlation with cartilage-to-cartilage contact.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Sang Eun Park; Louis E DeFrate; Matthew E Schutzer; Lunan Ji; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution.

Authors:  D E Hurwitz; D R Sumner; T P Andriacchi; D A Sugar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Age-related changes in the morphology and deformational behavior of knee joint cartilage.

Authors:  M Hudelmaier; C Glaser; J Hohe; K H Englmeier; M Reiser; R Putz; F Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-11

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency alters the in vivo motion of the tibiofemoral cartilage contact points in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Jeremy M Moses; Ramprasad Papannagari; Neil P Pathare; Louis E DeFrate; Thomas J Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  In vivo tibiofemoral contact analysis using 3D MRI-based knee models.

Authors:  Louis E DeFrate; Hao Sun; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation.

Authors:  C G Peterfy; C F van Dijke; D L Janzen; C C Glüer; R Namba; S Majumdar; P Lang; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  In vivo assessment of patellofemoral joint contact area in individuals who are pain free.

Authors:  Gretchen B Salsich; Samuel R Ward; Michael R Terk; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  44 in total

1.  Association of MR relaxation and cartilage deformation in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  K Subburaj; R B Souza; C Stehling; B T Wyman; M-P Le Graverand-Gastineau; T M Link; X Li; S Majumdar
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Fiducial marker-based correction for involuntary motion in weight-bearing C-arm CT scanning of knees. Part I. Numerical model-based optimization.

Authors:  Jang-Hwan Choi; Rebecca Fahrig; Andreas Keil; Thor F Besier; Saikat Pal; Emily J McWalter; Gary S Beaupré; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Validation of a fluid-structure interaction model of solute transport in pores of cyclically deformed tissue scaffolds.

Authors:  Jorn Op Den Buijs; Erik L Ritman; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 4.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  In-vivo time-dependent articular cartilage contact behavior of the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  A Hosseini; S K Van de Velde; M Kozanek; T J Gill; A J Grodzinsky; H E Rubash; G Li
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Increased tibiofemoral cartilage contact deformation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Samuel K Van de Velde; Jeffrey T Bingham; Ali Hosseini; Michal Kozanek; Louis E DeFrate; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-12

7.  Evaluation of kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees with use of advanced imaging techniques, three-dimensional modeling techniques, and robotics.

Authors:  Samuel K Van de Velde; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Microstructural remodeling of articular cartilage following defect repair by osteochondral autograft transfer.

Authors:  C B Raub; S C Hsu; E F Chan; R Shirazi; A C Chen; E Chnari; E J Semler; R L Sah
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  In vivo kinematics of the extensor mechanism of the knee during deep flexion.

Authors:  Koichi Kobayashi; Ali Hosseini; Makoto Sakamoto; Wei Qi; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Michal Kozanek; Ali Hosseini; Fang Liu; Samuel K Van de Velde; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.