Literature DB >> 34023755

Physiological articular contact kinematics and morphological femoral condyle translations of the tibiofemoral joint.

Chaochao Zhou1, Zhenming Zhang2, Zhitao Rao3, Timothy Foster4, Hany Bedair5, Guoan Li6.   

Abstract

The changes of tibiofemoral articular cartilage contact locations during knee activities represent a physiological functional characteristic of the knee. However, most studies reported relative motions of the tibia and femur using morphological flexion axes. Few data have been reported on comparisons of morphological femoral condyle motions and physiological tibiofemoral cartilage contact location changes. This study compared the morphological and physiological kinematic measures of 20 knees during an in vivo weightbearing single leg lunge from full extension to 120° of flexion using a combined MRI and dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) technique. The morphological femoral condyle motion was measured using three flexion axes: trans-epicondylar axis (TEA), geometric center axis (GCA) and iso-height axis (IHA). At low flexion angles, the medial femoral condyle moved anteriorly, opposite to that of the contact points, and was accompanied with a sharp increase in external femoral condyle rotation. At 120° of flexion, the morphological measures of the lateral femoral condyle were more posteriorly positioned than those of the contact locations. The data showed that the morphological measures of femoral condyle translations and axial rotations varied with different flexion axes and did not represent the physiological articular contact kinematics. Biomechanical evaluations of the knee joint motion should include both morphological and physiological kinematics data to accurately demonstrate the functionality of the knee.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage contact kinematics; Flexion axes; In vivo; Knee; Posterior femoral translation; Singe leg lunge

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34023755      PMCID: PMC8217277          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.789


  35 in total

1.  Establishment of a knee-joint coordinate system from helical axes analysis--a kinematic approach without anatomical referencing.

Authors:  Henrich Mannel; Frederic Marin; Lutz Claes; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Richard D Komistek; William Hoff
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review.

Authors:  J Victor
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Analysis of the Flexion Gap on In Vivo Knee Kinematics Using Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Shinichiro Nakamura; Hiromu Ito; Hiroyuki Yoshitomi; Shinichi Kuriyama; Richard D Komistek; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The clinical epicondylar axis is not the functional flexion axis of the human knee.

Authors:  Tomoharu Mochizuki; Takashi Sato; John David Blaha; Osamu Tanifuji; Koichi Kobayashi; Hiroshi Yamagiwa; Satoshi Watanabe; Yoshio Koga; Go Omori; Naoto Endo
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Coordinate system requirements to determine motions of the tibiofemoral joint free from kinematic crosstalk errors.

Authors:  Maury L Hull
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Is femoral component rotation in a TKA reliably guided by the functional flexion axis?

Authors:  Sam Oussedik; Corey Scholes; Duncan Ferguson; Justin Roe; David Parker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  How tibiofemoral alignment and contact locations affect predictions of medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces.

Authors:  Zachary F Lerner; Matthew S DeMers; Scott L Delp; Raymond C Browning
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Automatic determination of anatomical coordinate systems for three-dimensional bone models of the isolated human knee.

Authors:  Daniel L Miranda; Michael J Rainbow; Evan L Leventhal; Joseph J Crisco; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kirill Gromov; Mounim Korchi; Morten G Thomsen; Henrik Husted; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  Articulation of the femoral condyle during knee flexion.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Chaochao Zhou; Zhenming Zhang; Timothy Foster; Hany Bedair
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Location-Dependent Human Osteoarthritis Cartilage Response to Realistic Cyclic Loading: Ex-Vivo Analysis on Different Knee Compartments.

Authors:  Elisa Assirelli; Paolo Caravaggi; Antonio Mazzotti; Francesco Ursini; Alberto Leardini; Claudio Belvedere; Simona Neri
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.