Literature DB >> 34923296

Articulation of the femoral condyle during knee flexion.

Guoan Li1, Chaochao Zhou2, Zhenming Zhang3, Timothy Foster4, Hany Bedair5.   

Abstract

Femoral condyle motion of the knee is generally reported using a morphological trans-epicondyle axis (TEA) or geometric center axis (GCA) in the investigation of the knee kinematics. Axial rotation of the femur is recognized as a characteristic motion of the knee during flexion, but is controversial in the literature. This study investigated the biomechanical factors that could be associated to the axial rotations of the femur using both physiological and morphological measurement methods. Twenty healthy knees were investigated during a weightbearing flexion from 0° to 120° at a 15° increment using an imaging technique. A 3D model was constructed for each knee using MR images. Tibiofemoral cartilage contact points were determined at each flexion position to represent physiological knee motion. The contact distance on each condyle was measured between consecutive contact points. The TEA and GCA were used to measure morphological anteroposterior translations of the femoral condyles. The differences between the medial and lateral condyle motions were used to calculate the physiological and morphological axial rotations of the femur. Both the physiological and morphological methods measured external rotations of the femur at low flexion range (0°-45°) and minimal rotations at higher flexion angles. However, the morphological method measured larger posterior translations of the lateral femoral condyle than the medial condyle (p < 0.05), implying a medial pivoting rotation; in contrast, the physiological method measured larger contact distances on the medial condyle than on the lateral condyle (p < 0.05), implying a lateral pivoting rotation. These data could provide useful references for future investigation of kinematics of the knee before and after surgical repair, such as using total knee arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Articular contact motion; Axial rotation; Flexion axes; Knee kinematics; Medial pivoting

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34923296      PMCID: PMC8760888          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  46 in total

1.  Establishment of a knee-joint coordinate system from helical axes analysis--a kinematic approach without anatomical referencing.

Authors:  Henrich Mannel; Frederic Marin; Lutz Claes; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Richard D Komistek; William Hoff
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Knee-straining work activities, self-reported knee disorders and radiographically determined knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Lilli Kirkeskov Jensen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients: comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system.

Authors:  F Colle; S Bignozzi; N Lopomo; S Zaffagnini; L Sun; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee.

Authors:  Donald Eckhoff; Craig Hogan; Laura DiMatteo; Mitch Robinson; Joel Bach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review.

Authors:  J Victor
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Modification of the Grood and Suntay Joint Coordinate System equations for knee joint flexion.

Authors:  Danè Dabirrahmani; Michael Hogg
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  Is femoral component rotation in a TKA reliably guided by the functional flexion axis?

Authors:  Sam Oussedik; Corey Scholes; Duncan Ferguson; Justin Roe; David Parker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  How tibiofemoral alignment and contact locations affect predictions of medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces.

Authors:  Zachary F Lerner; Matthew S DeMers; Scott L Delp; Raymond C Browning
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kirill Gromov; Mounim Korchi; Morten G Thomsen; Henrik Husted; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.