Mark Worrall1, Alison Menhinick2, Donald J Thomson3. 1. 1 Department of Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK. 2. 2 Department of Radiology, Dundee Dental Hospital, Dundee, UK. 3. 3 Department of Dental Radiology, Edinburgh Dental Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the radiation dose reduction to the thyroid for an anterior oblique occlusal view from the use of a thyroid shield, compare this with the variation in thyroid dose resulting from differences in examination positioning and discuss the additional considerations associated with the use of a thyroid shield before making a recommendation on their routine use for this examination. METHODS: Doses to the oral mucosa, the salivary glands, the thyroid, the extrathoracic airways, the oesophagus and the lungs were directly measured for anterior oblique occlusal X-rays of a Rando phantom with and without a thyroid shield using strips of calibrated XRQA Gafchromic film. The examination was also simulated using Monte Carlo software for the without thyroid shield case for a comparison of the dose and to evaluate the dosimetric effect of suboptimal examination positioning. RESULTS: A 36% reduction in thyroid dose was measured as a result of thyroid shield use; the effective dose reduction is of the order of 22%. Suboptimal positioning was found to increase thyroid dose by a far more significant amount. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the reduction in thyroid dose, cost-benefit considerations mean that the purchase of a thyroid shield is only recommended where a very high number of anterior oblique occlusal views are undertaken. Optimization efforts for this examination are better focussed on training in examination positioning.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the radiation dose reduction to the thyroid for an anterior oblique occlusal view from the use of a thyroid shield, compare this with the variation in thyroid dose resulting from differences in examination positioning and discuss the additional considerations associated with the use of a thyroid shield before making a recommendation on their routine use for this examination. METHODS: Doses to the oral mucosa, the salivary glands, the thyroid, the extrathoracic airways, the oesophagus and the lungs were directly measured for anterior oblique occlusal X-rays of a Rando phantom with and without a thyroid shield using strips of calibrated XRQA Gafchromic film. The examination was also simulated using Monte Carlo software for the without thyroid shield case for a comparison of the dose and to evaluate the dosimetric effect of suboptimal examination positioning. RESULTS: A 36% reduction in thyroid dose was measured as a result of thyroid shield use; the effective dose reduction is of the order of 22%. Suboptimal positioning was found to increase thyroid dose by a far more significant amount. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the reduction in thyroid dose, cost-benefit considerations mean that the purchase of a thyroid shield is only recommended where a very high number of anterior oblique occlusal views are undertaken. Optimization efforts for this examination are better focussed on training in examination positioning.