Literature DB >> 28887673

[Intraocular pressure after implantation of an ICL with aquaport : Development of intraocular pressure after implantation of an ICL (model V4c) with aquaport without iridotomy].

B Repplinger1, T Kohnen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The latest version of the intraocular lens (ICL V4c) has a central hole (aquaport) that avoids a pupillary block. Due to this laser iridotomy or intraoperative surgical peripheral iridectomy are no longer required. In this study, we examined the intraocular pressure (IOP) after implantation of the ICL with aquaport, with special reference to the development of a possible pupillary block glaucoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective non-randomized study included 87 eyes from 46 patients (consecutive case series). These patients had the ICL model V4c (without a laser iridotomy or peripheral iridectomy) implanted between January 2013 and October 2014. The preoperative IOP values were compared with the postoperative values 1-2 h, 1 day, 1 week and 1 month after implantation.
RESULTS: The median intraocular pressure was 14 ± 2 mm Hg before implantation of the ICL, palpatory normotensive 1-2 h after implantation, 13 ± 3 mm Hg 1 day after implantation, 15 ± 3 mm Hg 1 week after implantation and 16 ± 4 mm Hg 1 month after implantation (a slight statistically significant increase of the intraocular pressure, p < 0.05). In 2 patients there was a steroid response in both eyes with IOP reaching up to a maximum of 28 mm Hg. There were no peaks of intraocular pressure due to a pupillary block.
CONCLUSION: It is possible to implant the latest ICL V4c with a central hole (Aquaport) without a laser iridotomy or peripheral iridectomy or development of a pupillary block.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquaport; ICL V4c; Intraocular pressure; Laser iridotomy; Pupillary block

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28887673     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0556-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  20 in total

1.  Control of ocular inflammation after cataract extraction with rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension.

Authors:  K K Assil; G Massry; R Lehmann; K Fox; R Stewart
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Ghost-image analysis in phakic intraocular lenses with central hole as a potential cause of dysphotopsia.

Authors:  Timo Eppig; Corinna Spira; Themistoklis Tsintarakis; Moatasem El-Husseiny; Alan Cayless; Marc Müller; Berthold Seitz; Achim Langenbucher
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  [Can the implantable collamer lens with AquaPORT technology safely prevent an angle block? Early experiences in the Homburg/Saar refractive surgery center].

Authors:  T Tsintarakis; T Eppig; A Langenbucher; B Seitz; M El-Husseiny
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Acute angle closure after implantable contact lens insertion unresponsive to surgical peripheral iridectomy.

Authors:  Kenneth C Y Chan; Wayne Birchall; Trevor B Gray; Anthony P Wells
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Safety of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of high myopia: anterior segment changes after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  I Jiménez-Alfaro; J M Benítez del Castillo; J García-Feijoó; J G Gil de Bernabé; J M Serrano de La Iglesia
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  Phakic intraocular lenses part 1: historical overview, current models, selection criteria, and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Jose Luis Güell; Merce Morral; Daniel Kook; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 7.  [Phakic intraocular lenses].

Authors:  T Kohnen; M Shajari
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Clinical outcomes after implantation of a posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for myopic correction.

Authors:  José F Alfonso; Carlos Lisa; Luis Fernández-Vega Cueto; Lurdes Belda-Salmerón; David Madrid-Costa; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens to correct myopia: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Necip Torun; Eckart Bertelmann; Matthias K J Klamann; Anna-Karina Maier; Anja Liekfeld; Johannes Gonnermann
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Long-Term Comparison of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens With and Without a Central Hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) Implantation for Moderate to High Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: Consort-Compliant Article.

Authors:  Kimiya Shimizu; Kazutaka Kamiya; Akihito Igarashi; Hidenaga Kobashi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  2 in total

1.  Short-term changes in and preoperative factors affecting vaulting after posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens implantation.

Authors:  Qiu-Jian Zhu; Wen-Jing Chen; Wei-Jian Zhu; Hai-Xiang Xiao; Man-Hui Zhu; Lie Ma; You Yuan; E Song
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  Five-year outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens implantation for the correction of high myopia and super high myopia.

Authors:  Xun Chen; Xuanqi Wang; Yilin Xu; Mingrui Cheng; Tian Han; LingLing Niu; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.