Literature DB >> 11150270

Safety of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of high myopia: anterior segment changes after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation.

I Jiménez-Alfaro1, J M Benítez del Castillo, J García-Feijoó, J G Gil de Bernabé, J M Serrano de La Iglesia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (PCPIOL) implantation in patients with high myopia.
DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty eyes of 10 patients were included. INTERVENTION: Staar Collamer Implantable Contact Lens PCPIOLs were implanted for the correction of high myopia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intra- and postoperative complications were recorded. Specular microscopy, lens fluorophotometry, laser flare-meter, and ultrasound biomicroscopy were performed before surgery and at different stages of the follow-up period to evaluate endothelial cell density, crystalline lens transmittance, aqueous flare, and anatomic relations of the implanted lenses with the other structures of the anterior segment.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications. One patient experienced pupillary entrapment by the lens in the immediate postoperative period, which was resolved without incident. Pigmentary dispersion or cataracts did not appear during the postoperative period. All the lenses remained correctly centered, and no patient reported night halos or glare. Anterior chamber depth showed a statistically significant reduction, between 9% and 12%. Central endothelial density was significantly decreased after surgery. The percentages of cell loss after 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 4.41%, 4.83%, 5.17%, 5.46%, and 6.57%, respectively. Aqueous flare increased by 49.19% in the first postoperative month in relation to preoperative values. Afterward, it decreased and then remained above preoperative values for the entire follow-up period (33.76% at month 3, 27.81% at month 6, 27.65% at month 12, 23.39% at month 18, and 27.27% at month 24). Crystalline lens transmittance decreased by 0.72% at month 3, by 1.44% at month 6, by 1.95% at month 12, by 2.25% at month 18, and by 2.24% at month 24. Finally, by ultrasound biomicroscopy it was observed that the PCPIOL and the crystalline lens were in contact on the peripheral level in 12 patients (60%) and in the center in another three patients (15%) during at least one checkup. In all the patients, contact between the PCPIOL and the posterior iris surface could be observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior chamber phakic IOL implantation for the surgical correction of high myopia is a safe procedure with regard to immediate visual and refractive results. The short-term clinical benefit and lack of immediate surgical complications are impressive. However, the increase in flare, the endothelial cell loss, the decrease in crystalline lens transmittance, and the iris-PCPIOL and crystalline lens-PCPIOL contact are findings that suggest caution regarding the long-term safety of this lens implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11150270     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00403-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  37 in total

Review 1.  [Phakic intraocular lenses. Current status and limitations].

Authors:  H B Dick; M Tehrani
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Three-year follow-up of subjective vault following myopic implantable collamer lens implantation.

Authors:  José F Alfonso; Carlos Lisa; A Abdelhamid; Paulo Fernandes; Jorge Jorge; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  An interesting case of implantable contact lens.

Authors:  V K Mohindra; Savio Pereira
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-06-21

Review 4.  [Intraocular lenses for the correction of refraction errors. Part II. Phakic posterior chamber lenses and refractive lens exchange with posterior chamber lens implantation].

Authors:  T Kohnen; T Kasper; E Terzi
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 5.  [Intraocular lenses for the correction of refraction errors. Part 1: phakic anterior chamber lenses].

Authors:  T Kohnen; M Baumeister; M Cichocki
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Phakic intraocular lenses outcomes and complications: Artisan vs Visian ICL.

Authors:  M A Hassaballa; T A Macky
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Modulation transfer function of intraocular collamer lens with a central artificial hole.

Authors:  Hiroshi Uozato; Kimiya Shimizu; Takushi Kawamorita; Fumiko Ohmoto
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  The posterior chamber phakic refractive lens (PRL): a review.

Authors:  R J Pérez-Cambrodí; D P Piñero; T Ferrer-Blasco; A Cerviño; R Brautaset
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Retinal detachment after phakic intraocular lens implantation in severe myopic eyes.

Authors:  Tingting Jiang; Qing Chang; Xiaoying Wang; Xin Huang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia.

Authors:  Ahmed M Emarah; Mostafa A El-Helw; Hazem M Yassin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.