Literature DB >> 28887626

Probability differently modulating the effects of reward and punishment on visuomotor adaptation.

Yanlong Song1, Ann L Smiley-Oyen2.   

Abstract

Recent human motor learning studies revealed that punishment seemingly accelerated motor learning but reward enhanced consolidation of motor memory. It is not evident how intrinsic properties of reward and punishment modulate the potentially dissociable effects of reward and punishment on motor learning and motor memory. It is also not clear what causes the dissociation of the effects of reward and punishment. By manipulating probability of distribution, a critical property of reward and punishment, the present study demonstrated that probability had distinct modulation on the effects of reward and punishment in adapting to a sudden visual rotation and consolidation of the adaptation memory. Specifically, two probabilities of monetary reward and punishment distribution, 50 and 100%, were applied during young adult participants adapting to a sudden visual rotation. Punishment and reward showed distinct effects on motor adaptation and motor memory. The group that received punishments in 100% of the adaptation trials adapted significantly faster than the other three groups, but the group that received rewards in 100% of the adaptation trials showed marked savings in re-adapting to the same rotation. In addition, the group that received punishments in 50% of the adaptation trials that were randomly selected also had savings in re-adapting to the same rotation. Sensitivity to sensory prediction error or difference in explicit process induced by reward and punishment may likely contribute to the distinct effects of reward and punishment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Punishment; Reward; Savings; Sensorimotor learning; Visuomotor adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28887626     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5082-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A PROOF OF THE LAW OF EFFECT.

Authors:  E L Thorndike
Journal:  Science       Date:  1933-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient.

Authors:  Eric Zarahn; Gregory D Weston; Johnny Liang; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Neural basis of utility estimation.

Authors:  P Shizgal
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Reward feedback accelerates motor learning.

Authors:  Ali A Nikooyan; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The influence of movement preparation time on the expression of visuomotor learning and savings.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; David M Huberdeau; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Partial reinforcement, extinction, and placebo analgesia.

Authors:  Siu Tsin Au Yeung; Ben Colagiuri; Peter F Lovibond; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains.

Authors:  Mitsunari Abe; Heidi Schambra; Eric M Wassermann; Dave Luckenbaugh; Nicolas Schweighofer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Elizabeth Mallia; John Rothwell; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Reconciling the role of serotonin in behavioral inhibition and aversion: acute tryptophan depletion abolishes punishment-induced inhibition in humans.

Authors:  Molly J Crockett; Luke Clark; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reward-Based Improvements in Motor Control Are Driven by Multiple Error-Reducing Mechanisms.

Authors:  Olivier Codol; Peter J Holland; Sanjay G Manohar; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Aimee D Tomlinson; Rakshith Lokesh; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Priya Patel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visuomotor errors drive step length and step time adaptation during 'virtual' split-belt walking: the effects of reinforcement feedback.

Authors:  Sumire Sato; Ashley Cui; Julia T Choi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reward-Based Learning and Emotional Habit Formation in the Cerebellum.

Authors:  Jordan E Pierce; Julie A Péron
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Learning from the Physical Consequences of Our Actions Improves Motor Memory.

Authors:  Amanda Bakkum; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-01

6.  The cost of correcting for error during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Katinka van der Kooij; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; Tessa Rigterink; Krista E Overvliet; Joeren B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pharmacological Dopamine Manipulation Does Not Alter Reward-Based Improvements in Memory Retention during a Visuomotor Adaptation Task.

Authors:  Graziella Quattrocchi; Jessica Monaco; Andy Ho; Friederike Irmen; Wolfgang Strube; Diane Ruge; Sven Bestmann; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-07-16

9.  Beyond Motor Noise: Considering Other Causes of Impaired Reinforcement Learning in Cerebellar Patients.

Authors:  Pierre Vassiliadis; Gerard Derosiere; Julie Duque
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-02-22

10.  Intention to learn modulates the impact of reward and punishment on sequence learning.

Authors:  Adam Steel; Chris I Baker; Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.