Literature DB >> 21419628

Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains.

Mitsunari Abe1, Heidi Schambra, Eric M Wassermann, Dave Luckenbaugh, Nicolas Schweighofer, Leonardo G Cohen.   

Abstract

In humans, training in which good performance is rewarded or bad performance punished results in transient behavioral improvements. The relative effects of reward and punishment on consolidation and long-term retention, critical behavioral stages for successful learning, are not known. Here, we investigated the effects of reward and punishment on these different stages of human motor skill learning. We studied healthy subjects who trained on a motor task under rewarded, punished, or neutral control conditions. Performance was tested before and immediately, 6 hr, 24 hr, and 30 days after training in the absence of reward or punishment. Performance improvements immediately after training were comparable in the three groups. At 6 hr, the rewarded group maintained performance gains, whereas the other two groups experienced significant forgetting. At 24 hr, the reward group showed significant offline (posttraining) improvements, whereas the other two groups did not. At 30 days, the rewarded group retained the gains identified at 24 hr, whereas the other two groups experienced significant forgetting. We conclude that training under rewarded conditions is more effective than training under punished or neutral conditions in eliciting lasting motor learning, an advantage driven by offline memory gains that persist over time.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21419628      PMCID: PMC3075334          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  39 in total

1.  Cerebellar subjects show impaired adaptation of anticipatory EMG during catching.

Authors:  C E Lang; A J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Julien Doyon; Allen W Song; Avi Karni; Francois Lalonde; Michelle M Adams; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dynamic cortical and subcortical networks in learning and delayed recall of timed motor sequences.

Authors:  Virginia B Penhune; Julien Doyon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning.

Authors:  Julien Doyon; Virginia Penhune; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  How long will long-term potentiation last?

Authors:  Wickliffe C Abraham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Temporal discounting of reward and the cost of time in motor control.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr; Jean Jacques Orban de Xivry; Minnan Xu-Wilson; Ting-Yu Shih
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Getting formal with dopamine and reward.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  A cellular mechanism of reward-related learning.

Authors:  J N Reynolds; B I Hyland; J R Wickens
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Dopamine and adaptive memory.

Authors:  Daphna Shohamy; R Alison Adcock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  Dopamine: a potential substrate for synaptic plasticity and memory mechanisms.

Authors:  Thérèse M Jay
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 11.685

View more
  111 in total

Review 1.  Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Striatal mechanisms underlying movement, reinforcement, and punishment.

Authors:  Alexxai V Kravitz; Anatol C Kreitzer
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-06

4.  Emotion and reward are dissociable from error during motor learning.

Authors:  Sara B Festini; Stephanie D Preston; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Interference effects between manual and oral motor skills.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Gagné; Henri Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

Review 7.  New insights in human memory interference and consolidation.

Authors:  Edwin M Robertson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  The many facets of motor learning and their relevance for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Lucio Marinelli; Angelo Quartarone; Mark Hallett; Giuseppe Frazzitta; Maria Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study.

Authors:  Ander Ramos-Murguialday; Doris Broetz; Massimiliano Rea; Leonhard Läer; Ozge Yilmaz; Fabricio L Brasil; Giulia Liberati; Marco R Curado; Eliana Garcia-Cossio; Alexandros Vyziotis; Woosang Cho; Manuel Agostini; Ernesto Soares; Surjo Soekadar; Andrea Caria; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Somatosensory working memory in human reinforcement-based motor learning.

Authors:  Ananda Sidarta; Floris T van Vugt; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.