Literature DB >> 28876298

Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection With Papanicolaou Test Referral for Infrequently Screened Women in the United States.

Jennifer S Smith, Andrea C Des Marais, Allison M Deal, Alice R Richman, Carolina Perez-Heydrich, Belinda Yen-Lieberman, Lynn Barclay, Jerome Belinson, Allen Rinas, Noel T Brewer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection using mailed, self-collected samples is a promising approach to increase screening in women who do not attend clinic screening at recommended intervals.
METHODS: To assess this intervention among high-risk women in the United States, 429 women without a Papanicolaou (Pap) test in 4 or more years (overdue by US guidelines) were recruited from the general population. Participants aged 30 to 65 years were mailed a kit to self-collect a cervicovaginal sample at home, return the sample by mail, and receive HPV results by telephone, with referral to follow-up cytological Pap testing at a local clinic. Cervicovaginal self-samples were collected with a Viba brush, stored in Scope mouthwash, and tested by Hybrid Capture 2. Data were collected in 2010 to 2011 and analyzed in 2017.
RESULTS: Two-thirds (64%) of participants returned a self-collected sample, of whom 15% tested HPV DNA positive. Human papillomavirus self-test-positive women reported higher rates of follow-up Pap tests (82%) than did those with self-test negative results (51%). No demographic differences were found in self-test return rate or HPV positivity. High acceptability was reported in participant surveys: most women (81%) had "mostly positive" overall thoughts about the self-test, and most reported being comfortable receiving the kit in the mail (99%), returning their self-collected sample by mail (82%), and receiving their test results by telephone (97%).
CONCLUSIONS: Conducting HPV self-testing through population-based recruitment, mailed kit delivery and return by mail, and results delivery by telephone has the potential to reach a broad segment of US underscreened women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28876298      PMCID: PMC5846187          DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  41 in total

1.  Cancer screening - United States, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Comparative community outreach to increase cervical cancer screening in the Mississippi Delta.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Alfio Rausa; Tameka Walls; Patti E Gravitt; Edward E Partridge; Vanessa Olivo; Shelley Niwa; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Laura Tucker; Hormuzd Katki; Isabel Scarinci
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Self-sample HPV tests as an intervention for nonattendees of cervical cancer screening in Finland: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Anni Virtanen; Pekka Nieminen; Tapio Luostarinen; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States and the potential impact of implementation of screening guidelines.

Authors:  Diane Solomon; Nancy Breen; Timothy McNeel
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Community-Based Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Feasibility Study of Rural Appalachian Women.

Authors:  Richard A Crosby; Michael E Hagensee; Robin Vanderpool; Nia Nelson; Adam Parrish; Tom Collins; Nebraska Jones
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Offering Self-Sampling Kits for HPV Testing to Reach Women Who Do Not Attend in the Regular Cervical Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Freija Verdoodt; Peter J F Snijders; Viola M J Verhoef; Eero Suonio; Lena Dillner; Silvia Minozzi; Cristina Bellisario; Rita Banzi; Fang-Hui Zhao; Peter Hillemanns; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.

Authors:  C Sarai Racey; Dionne C Gesink; Ann N Burchell; Suzanne Trivers; Tom Wong; Anu Rebbapragada
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Mouthwash as a low-cost and safe specimen transport medium for human papillomavirus DNA testing of cervicovaginal specimens.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Mark Sadorra; Francisco A R Garcia; Allison P Cullen; Attila T Lorincz; Amy L Mitchell; Denise Whitby; Ronald Chuke; Janet R Kornegay
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Vaginal self-sampling is an adequate means of screening HR-HPV types in women not participating in regular cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  C Tamalet; L Le Retraite; F-X Leandri; P Heid; H Sancho Garnier; L Piana
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 8.067

View more
  14 in total

1.  Home Self-Collection by Mail to Test for Human Papillomavirus and Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Andrea C Des Marais; Yuqian Zhao; Marcia M Hobbs; Vijay Sivaraman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Results of a Pilot Study of a Mail-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-Testing Program for Underscreened Women From Appalachian Ohio.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Abigail B Shoben; Deborah McDonough; Mack T Ruffin; Martin Steinau; Elizabeth R Unger; Electra D Paskett; Mira L Katz
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 3.  Variation in Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences among Medically Underserved Individuals in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Meghan C O'Leary; Stephanie B Wheeler; Lisa P Spees
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Preference for Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection and Papanicolaou: Survey of Underscreened Women in North Carolina.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kilfoyle; Andrea C Des Marais; Mai Anh Ngo; LaHoma Romocki; Alice R Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Lisa Rahangdale; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1.

Authors:  Cary Suzanne Lea; Carolina Perez-Heydrich; Andrea C Des Marais; Alice R Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Prevalence of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus by RNA Assay in Home Self-Collected Samples Among Underscreened People in North Carolina.

Authors:  Fan Lee; Alexandra Bukowski; Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Noel T Brewer; Busola Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Sarah Jackson; Lynn Barclay; Alicia Carter; Jennifer H Tang; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Acceptability and ease of use of mailed HPV self-collection among infrequently screened women in North Carolina.

Authors:  Chelsea Anderson; Lindsay Breithaupt; Andrea Des Marais; Charlotte Rastas; Alice Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  HPV sampling options for cervical cancer screening: preferences of urban-dwelling Canadians in a changing paradigm.

Authors:  G D Datta; M H Mayrand; S Qureshi; N Ferre; L Gauvin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  Too many women are dying from cervix cancer: Problems and solutions.

Authors:  David K Gaffney; Mia Hashibe; Deanna Kepka; Kathryn A Maurer; Theresa L Werner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Perceived Financial Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Cost Burden Among Low-Income, Under-Screened Women.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Jennifer S Smith; Noel T Brewer; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Lynn Barclay; Sarah Jackson; Erin E Kent; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.