Literature DB >> 28866635

Acceptability and ease of use of mailed HPV self-collection among infrequently screened women in North Carolina.

Chelsea Anderson1, Lindsay Breithaupt1, Andrea Des Marais1, Charlotte Rastas2, Alice Richman3, Lynn Barclay4, Noel T Brewer1,5, Jennifer S Smith1,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Self-collection of cervico-vaginal samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has the potential to make cervical cancer screening more accessible to underscreened women. We evaluated the acceptability and ease of use of home-based HPV self-collection within a diverse population of low-income, infrequently screened women.
METHODS: Participants were low-income women from North Carolina who had not received Pap testing in 4 or more years. Eligible women received a self-collection kit containing instructions and a brush for home-based sample collection. A total of 227 women returned a self-collected sample by mail and completed a questionnaire to assess their experiences with HPV self-collection. We described acceptability measures and used logistic regression to identify predictors of overall positive thoughts about the self-collection experience.
RESULTS: Nearly all women were willing to perform HPV self-collection again (98%) and were comfortable receiving the self-collection kit in the mail (99%). Overall, 81% of participants reported positive thoughts about home-based self-collection. Women with at least some college education and those who were divorced, separated or widowed were more likely to report overall positive thoughts. Aspects of self-collection that participants most commonly reported liking included convenience (53%), ease of use (32%) and privacy (23%). The most frequently reported difficulties included uncertainty that the self-collection was done correctly (16%) and difficulty inserting the self-collection brush (16%).
CONCLUSIONS: Home-based self-collection for HPV was a highly acceptable screening method among low-income, underscreened women and holds the promise to increase access to cervical cancer screening in this high-risk population. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV; United States; Uterine cervical neoplasms; cervical neoplasia; early detection of cancer; female; humans; papillomavirus infections; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28866635      PMCID: PMC5831249          DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  30 in total

1.  Comparative community outreach to increase cervical cancer screening in the Mississippi Delta.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Alfio Rausa; Tameka Walls; Patti E Gravitt; Edward E Partridge; Vanessa Olivo; Shelley Niwa; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Laura Tucker; Hormuzd Katki; Isabel Scarinci
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Community-Based Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Feasibility Study of Rural Appalachian Women.

Authors:  Richard A Crosby; Michael E Hagensee; Robin Vanderpool; Nia Nelson; Adam Parrish; Tom Collins; Nebraska Jones
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Acceptability and usability of self-collected sampling for HPV testing among African-American women living in the Mississippi Delta.

Authors:  Isabel C Scarinci; Allison G Litton; Isabel C Garcés-Palacio; Edward E Partridge; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013-02-12

4.  HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort study.

Authors:  Murat Gök; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Folkert J van Kemenade; Johannes Berkhof; Lawrence Rozendaal; Johan W M Spruyt; Feja Voorhorst; Jeroen A M Beliën; Milena Babovic; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-11

5.  Feasibility of Cervical Cancer Screening Utilizing Self-sample Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Mexican Immigrant Women in Harris County, Texas: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jane R Montealegre; Patricia D Mullen; Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Maria M Vargas Mendez; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06

6.  Self-sampling versus reminder letter: effects on cervical cancer screening attendance and coverage in Finland.

Authors:  Anni Virtanen; Ahti Anttila; Tapio Luostarinen; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  The acceptability of a self-lavaging device compared to pelvic examination for cervical cancer screening among low-income women.

Authors:  Heidi E Jones; Karen Brudney; Dorothy J Sawo; Rafael Lantigua; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Assessing the acceptability of self-sampling for HPV among Haitian immigrant women: CBPR in action.

Authors:  Lindley Barbee; Erin Kobetz; Janelle Menard; Nicole Cook; Jenny Blanco; Betsy Barton; Pascale Auguste; Nathalie McKenzie
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Attitudes toward self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among primary care attendees living on the US-Mexico border.

Authors:  Eribeth Penaranda; Jennifer Molokwu; Ingrid Hernandez; Rebekah Salaiz; Norma Nguyen; Theresa Byrd; Navkiran Shokar
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Mouthwash as a low-cost and safe specimen transport medium for human papillomavirus DNA testing of cervicovaginal specimens.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Mark Sadorra; Francisco A R Garcia; Allison P Cullen; Attila T Lorincz; Amy L Mitchell; Denise Whitby; Ronald Chuke; Janet R Kornegay
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  19 in total

1.  Home Self-Collection by Mail to Test for Human Papillomavirus and Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Andrea C Des Marais; Yuqian Zhao; Marcia M Hobbs; Vijay Sivaraman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Detection and genotyping of HPV in urine samples from Chilean women attending primary health care centers.

Authors:  Nicolás Vergara; Monserrat Balanda; Wilma Hidalgo; Héctor San Martín; Alexis Aceituno; Francisco Roldán; Tania Villalón; Melissa Hott; Gloria Espinoza; Andrea Quiero; María T Valenzuela; Eugenio Ramírez
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Qualitative assessment of attitudes toward cervical cancer (CC) screening and HPV self-sampling among African American (AA) and Sub Saharan African Immigrant (SAI) women.

Authors:  Adebola Adegboyega; Adeyimika T Desmennu; Mark Dignan
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  Prevalence of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus by RNA Assay in Home Self-Collected Samples Among Underscreened People in North Carolina.

Authors:  Fan Lee; Alexandra Bukowski; Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Noel T Brewer; Busola Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Sarah Jackson; Lynn Barclay; Alicia Carter; Jennifer H Tang; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Willingness to Self-Collect a Sample for HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in a Well-Screened Cohort: HPV FOCAL Survey Results.

Authors:  Anne Lesack; Laurie W Smith; C Sarai Racey; Lovedeep Gondara; Mel Krajden; Marette Lee; Ruth Elwood Martin; Gavin Stuart; Stuart Peacock; Eduardo L Franco; Dirk van Niekerk; Gina S Ogilvie
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  "We are looking at the future right now": community acceptability of a home-based viral load test device in the context of HIV cure-related research with analytical treatment interruptions in the United States.

Authors:  Karine Dubé; John Kanazawa; Christopher Roebuck; Steven Johnson; William B Carter; Lynda Dee; Beth Peterson; Kenneth M Lynn; Linden Lalley-Chareczko; Emily Hiserodt; Sukyung Kim; Daniel Rosenbloom; Brad R Evans; Melanie Anderson; Daria J Hazuda; Lisa Shipley; Kevin Bateman; Bonnie J Howell; Karam Mounzer; Pablo Tebas; Luis J Montaner
Journal:  HIV Res Clin Pract       Date:  2022-03-29

7.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in Acceptability of Urine and Cervico-Vaginal Sample Self-Collection for HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Eliane Rohner; F Hunter McGuire; Yutong Liu; Quefeng Li; Kate Miele; Samveg A Desai; John W Schmitt; Andrea Knittel; Julie A E Nelson; Claire Edelman; Vijay Sivaraman; Anna Baker; LaHoma S Romocki; Lisa Rahangdale; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Too many women are dying from cervix cancer: Problems and solutions.

Authors:  David K Gaffney; Mia Hashibe; Deanna Kepka; Kathryn A Maurer; Theresa L Werner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Perceived Financial Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Cost Burden Among Low-Income, Under-Screened Women.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Jennifer S Smith; Noel T Brewer; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Lynn Barclay; Sarah Jackson; Erin E Kent; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 10.  Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing: Increased Cervical Cancer Screening Participation and Incorporation in International Screening Programs.

Authors:  Sarah Gupta; Christina Palmer; Elisabeth M Bik; Juan P Cardenas; Harold Nuñez; Laurens Kraal; Sara W Bird; Jennie Bowers; Alison Smith; Nathaniel A Walton; Audrey D Goddard; Daniel E Almonacid; Susan Zneimer; Jessica Richman; Zachary S Apte
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.