Caitlin B Biddell1,2, Lisa P Spees1,2, Jennifer S Smith2,3, Noel T Brewer2,4, Andrea C Des Marais3, Busola O Sanusi5, Michael G Hudgens5, Lynn Barclay6, Sarah Jackson3, Erin E Kent1,2, Stephanie B Wheeler1,2. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 4. Department of Health Behavior and Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 6. American Sexual Health Association, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
Background: Despite screening's effectiveness in reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality, disparities in cervical cancer screening uptake remain, with lower rates documented among uninsured and low-income individuals. We examined perceived financial barriers to, and the perceived cost burden of, cervical cancer screening. Materials and Methods: We surveyed 702 low-income, uninsured or publicly insured women ages 25-64 years in North Carolina, U.S., who were not up to date on cervical cancer screening according to national guidelines. Participants were asked about perceived financial barriers to screening and how much they perceived screening would cost. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the sociodemographic predictors of perceived financial barriers. Results: Seventy-two percent of participants perceived financial barriers to screening. Screening appointment costs (71%) and follow-up/future treatment costs (44%) were most commonly reported, followed by lost pay due to time missed from work (6%) and transportation costs (5%). In multivariable analysis, being uninsured (vs. publicly insured), younger (25-34 vs. 50-64 years), White (vs. Black), and not reporting income data were associated with perceiving screening costs and future treatment costs as barriers to screening. Participants reported wide-ranging estimates of the perceived out-of-pocket cost of screening ($0-$1300), with a median expected cost of $245. Conclusions: The majority of our sample of low-income women perceived substantial financial barriers to screening, particularly related to screening appointment costs and potential follow-up/future treatment costs. Providing greater cost transparency and access to financial assistance may reduce perceived financial barriers to screening, potentially increasing screening uptake among this underserved population. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02651883.
Background: Despite screening's effectiveness in reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality, disparities in cervical cancer screening uptake remain, with lower rates documented among uninsured and low-income individuals. We examined perceived financial barriers to, and the perceived cost burden of, cervical cancer screening. Materials and Methods: We surveyed 702 low-income, uninsured or publicly insured women ages 25-64 years in North Carolina, U.S., who were not up to date on cervical cancer screening according to national guidelines. Participants were asked about perceived financial barriers to screening and how much they perceived screening would cost. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the sociodemographic predictors of perceived financial barriers. Results: Seventy-two percent of participants perceived financial barriers to screening. Screening appointment costs (71%) and follow-up/future treatment costs (44%) were most commonly reported, followed by lost pay due to time missed from work (6%) and transportation costs (5%). In multivariable analysis, being uninsured (vs. publicly insured), younger (25-34 vs. 50-64 years), White (vs. Black), and not reporting income data were associated with perceiving screening costs and future treatment costs as barriers to screening. Participants reported wide-ranging estimates of the perceived out-of-pocket cost of screening ($0-$1300), with a median expected cost of $245. Conclusions: The majority of our sample of low-income women perceived substantial financial barriers to screening, particularly related to screening appointment costs and potential follow-up/future treatment costs. Providing greater cost transparency and access to financial assistance may reduce perceived financial barriers to screening, potentially increasing screening uptake among this underserved population. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02651883.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer screening; cervical cancer; financial barriers; health disparities; human papillomavirus; under-screened populations
Authors: Carlos O Garrido; Rebekah A Coşkun; Adrienne B Lent; Elizabeth Calhoun; Robin B Harris Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Lisa P Spees; Andrea C Des Marais; Stephanie B Wheeler; Michael G Hudgens; Sarah Doughty; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Trials Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Jennifer C Spencer; Noel T Brewer; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Justin G Trogdon; Morris Weinberger; Stephanie B Wheeler Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-09-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Erica E Zeno; Noel T Brewer; Lisa P Spees; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Sarah Jackson; Lynn Barclay; Stephanie B Wheeler; Jennifer S Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-13 Impact factor: 3.752