Literature DB >> 32457182

Variation in Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences among Medically Underserved Individuals in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Caitlin B Biddell1, Meghan C O'Leary2,3, Stephanie B Wheeler2,3,4, Lisa P Spees2,3.   

Abstract

Underutilization of effective screening is one driver of disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality. Consideration of patient preferences could help to improve screening rates in populations facing substantial barriers to preventive care. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on cervical cancer screening preferences among medically underserved patients in the United States. We searched six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) for articles published through February 2019 (Prospero ID: CRD42019125431). Among the 43 articles included, 23 reported screening modality preferences, 11 reported preferences related to provider demographics and attributes, six reported screening scheduling and results delivery preferences, and nine reported preferences related to health education and communication. This review demonstrates the wide variety of medically underserved patient preferences related to cervical cancer screening. It also draws attention to two key preference trends that emerged despite heterogeneity in study design, populations, and preference assessment. Consistent preferences for human papillomavirus self-testing over traditional Pap testing highlight a key potential mechanism for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake among medically underserved populations. In addition, preferences for gender- and language-concordant providers underscore the need for continued efforts toward expanding diversity among medical professionals. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32457182      PMCID: PMC7415615          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  72 in total

1.  Acceptability of Women Self-Sampling versus Clinician-Collected Samples for HPV DNA Testing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Karen Morgan; Meram Azzani; Si Lay Khaing; Yut-Lin Wong; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practices for cervical cancer screening among the Bhutanese refugee community in Omaha, Nebraska.

Authors:  Rebecca J Haworth; Ruth Margalit; Christine Ross; Tikka Nepal; Amr S Soliman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-10

3.  Pap prevalence and cervical cancer prevention among Alaska Native women.

Authors:  A P Lanier; J J Kelly; P Holck
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

4.  Human Papilloma Virus and Cervical Cancer Education Needs among HIV-Positive Haitian Women in Miami.

Authors:  Sonjia Kenya; Olveen Carrasquillo; Marie Fatil; Jamal Jones; Chrystelle Jean; India Huff; Erin Kobetz
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-04-09

5.  Acceptability and Feasibility of Human Papilloma Virus Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Kumar Ilangovan; Erin Kobetz; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Erin N Marcus; Brendaly Rodriguez; Yisel Alonzo; Olveen Carrasquillo
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among Chinese American women.

Authors:  E S Yu; K K Kim; E H Chen; R A Brintnall
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

7.  Women's Attitudes Toward Cervicovaginal Self-Sampling for High-Risk HPV Infection on the US-Mexico Border.

Authors:  Eribeth Penaranda; Jennifer Molokwu; Silvia Flores; Theresa Byrd; Louis Brown; Navkiran Shokar
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Women's preferences for gynecological examiners: sex versus role.

Authors:  K Alexander; J McCullough
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1981 Fall-Winter

Review 9.  Patient preferences for noninsulin diabetes medications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tanjala S Purnell; Susan Joy; Emily Little; John F P Bridges; Nisa Maruthur
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Decision making about Pap test use among Korean immigrant women: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Soohyun Kim; Joseph J Gallo; Marie T Nolan; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.