Literature DB >> 30874477

Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1.

Cary Suzanne Lea1,2, Carolina Perez-Heydrich1,3, Andrea C Des Marais4, Alice R Richman5, Lynn Barclay6, Noel T Brewer2,7, Jennifer S Smith2,4.   

Abstract

Background: Approximately one-half of cervical cancer cases in the United States occur in underscreened or never-screened women. We examined predictors to completing Papanicolaou (Pap) testing and whether a positive human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection result affects Pap testing adherence among underscreened women. Materials and
Methods: Low-income women aged 30-65 years who reported no Pap testing in ≥4 years were recruited in North Carolina. Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers regarding cervical cancer and Pap testing were assessed by telephone questionnaires. We mailed self-collection kits for HPV testing and provided information regarding where to obtain affordable Pap testing. Participants received $45 for completing all activities. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the predictors of longer reported time since last Pap (≥10 vs. 4-9 years) and of completion of Pap testing following study enrollment (follow-up Pap).
Results: Participants (n = 230) were primarily black (55%), uninsured (64%), and with ≤high school education (59%). Cost and finding an affordable clinic were the most commonly reported barriers to screening. White women and those with ≤high school education reported longer intervals since last Pap test. Half of the participants reported completing a follow-up Pap test (55%). Women with a positive HPV self-collection were five times more likely to report completing a follow-up Pap test than those with negative self-collection (odds ratio = 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-25.7). Conclusions: Improving awareness of resources for affordable screening could increase cervical cancer screening in underserved women. Home-based HPV self-collection represents an opportunity to re-engage infrequently screened women into preventive screening services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barriers; cervical cancer screening; human papillomavirus; self-collection; underscreened

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30874477      PMCID: PMC6703237          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  41 in total

1.  Papanicolaou testing among women in the southern United States.

Authors:  Neeraja B Peterson; Harvey J Murff; Yong Cui; Margaret Hargreaves; Jay H Fowke
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Timothy P Johnson; Young Ik Cho; Jennifer A Walk
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Adherence of low-income women to cancer screening recommendations.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Christopher B Forrest; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.

Authors:  Wendy A Leyden; M Michele Manos; Ann M Geiger; Sheila Weinmann; Judy Mouchawar; Kimberly Bischoff; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Joyce Gilbert; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Social and cultural barriers to Papanicolaou test screening in an urban population.

Authors:  Kian Behbakht; Anne Lynch; Stephanie Teal; Koen Degeest; Stewart Massad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975-2000.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Barry A Miller; Benjamin F Hankey; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Correlates of cervical cancer screening among underserved Hispanic and African-American women.

Authors:  Mohsen Bazargan; Shahrzad H Bazargan; Muhammad Farooq; Richard S Baker
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 8.  Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women.

Authors:  Kelly Ackerson; Kimberlee Gretebeck
Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract       Date:  2007-11

9.  Self-sampling of the vaginal fluid at home combined with high-risk HPV testing.

Authors:  K Sanner; I Wikström; A Strand; M Lindell; E Wilander
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The vicious cycle of inadequate early detection: a complementary study on barriers to cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  Corinne R Leach; Nancy E Schoenberg
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake and Predictors Among Women in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Sultanah F Alsalmi; Sahar S Othman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-12

2.  Perceived Financial Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Cost Burden Among Low-Income, Under-Screened Women.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Jennifer S Smith; Noel T Brewer; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Lynn Barclay; Sarah Jackson; Erin E Kent; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.017

3.  Cervical cancer screening uptake and determinant factors among women in Ambo town, Western Oromia, Ethiopia: Community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shewaye F Natae; Digafe T Nigatu; Mulu K Negawo; Wakeshe W Mengesha
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Racial and ethnic differences in cervical cancer screening barriers and intentions: The My Body My Test-3 HPV self-collection trial among under-screened, low-income women.

Authors:  Erica E Zeno; Noel T Brewer; Lisa P Spees; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Sarah Jackson; Lynn Barclay; Stephanie B Wheeler; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.