Literature DB >> 28871445

Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.

Ineke J M van der Ham1, Jantina Brummelman2, Marie Elise Aerts2, Alyanne M de Haan2, H Chris Dijkerman2.   

Abstract

Lateralized pointing has been shown to cause not only a shift in visuo-motor midline, but also a shift in non-lateralized spatial attention. Non-lateralized cognitive consequences of lateralized pointing have been reported for local and global visuospatial processing. Here, we evaluate these findings and examine this effect for categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing, for which the attentional processes are thought to be highly similar to local and global visuospatial processing, respectively. Participants performed a commonly used working memory task to assess categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing. Lateralized pointing with either the left or the right hand, to either the left or the right side was introduced as a manipulation, as well as a new control condition without any pointing. Performance on the spatial relation task was measured before and after pointing. The results suggest that non-lateralized consequences of lateralized pointing cannot be generalized to other cognitive tasks relying on attentional processing. Further examination of lateralized pointing is recommended before drawing further conclusions concerning its impact on non-lateralized cognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Lateralized pointing; Spatial relations; Visuospatial perception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28871445     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-017-0833-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  21 in total

1.  Flexible visual processing of spatial relationships.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; Jason M Scimeca; Jessica C Roth; Sarah A Helseth; Lauren E Kahn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-11-26

2.  Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Mathijs Raemaekers; Richard J A van Wezel; Anna Oleksiak; Albert Postma
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Processing spatial relations with different apertures of attention.

Authors:  Bruno Laeng; Matia Okubo; Ayako Saneyoshi; Chikashi Michimata
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-10-12

4.  The effect of attentional scope on spatial relation processing: a case study.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; H Chris Dijkerman; Esther van den Berg
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 0.881

Review 5.  Lateralized perception: the role of attention in spatial relation processing.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert Postma; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms reduces the global processing bias of healthy individuals.

Authors:  Janet H Bultitude; Jill M Woods
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Prism adaptation influences perception but not attention: evidence from antisaccades.

Authors:  Tanja Nijboer; Anneloes Vree; Chris Dijkerman; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Effects of the global and local attention on the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.

Authors:  Chikashi Michimata; Ayako Saneyoshi; Matia Okubo; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Differential influences of prism adaptation on reflexive and voluntary covert attention.

Authors:  Christopher Striemer; Jeffery Sablatnig; James Danckert
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Spatial bias induced by a non-conflictual task reveals the nature of space perception.

Authors:  Eve Dupierrix; David Alleysson; Théophile Ohlmann; Sylvie Chokron
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.