Literature DB >> 21429001

Processing spatial relations with different apertures of attention.

Bruno Laeng1, Matia Okubo, Ayako Saneyoshi, Chikashi Michimata.   

Abstract

Neuropsychological studies suggest the existence of lateralized networks that represent categorical and coordinate types of spatial information. In addition, studies with neural networks have shown that they encode more effectively categorical spatial judgments or coordinate spatial judgments, if their input is based, respectively, on units with relatively small, nonoverlapping receptive fields, as opposed to units with relatively large, overlapping receptive fields. These findings leave open the question of whether interactive processes between spatial detectors and types of spatial relations can be modulated by spatial attention. We hypothesized that spreading the attention window to encompass an area that includes two objects promotes coordinate spatial relations, based on coarse coding by large, overlapping, receptive fields. In contrast, narrowing attention to encompass an area that includes only one of the objects benefits categorical spatial relations, by effectively parsing space. By use of a cueing procedure, the spatial attention window was manipulated to select regions of differing areas. As predicted, when the attention window was large, coordinate spatial transformations were noticed faster than categorical transformations; in contrast, when the attention window was relatively smaller, categorical spatial transformations were noticed faster than coordinate transformations. Another novel finding was that coordinate changes were noticed faster when cueing an area that included both objects as well as the empty space between them than when simultaneously cueing both areas including the objects while leaving the gap between them uncued.
Copyright © 2010 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21429001     DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01139.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  7 in total

1.  Differential neural activity patterns for spatial relations in humans: a MEG study.

Authors:  Nicole M Scott; Arthur Leuthold; Maria D Sera; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Jantina Brummelman; Marie Elise Aerts; Alyanne M de Haan; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-09-04

3.  Frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a hierarchical organisation.

Authors:  Francesco Ruotolo; Tina Iachini; Albert Postma; Ineke J M van der Ham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Retinotopic mapping of categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Maarten J A Duijndam; Mathijs Raemaekers; Richard J A van Wezel; Anna Oleksiak; Albert Postma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Focusing narrowly or broadly attention when judging categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a MEG study.

Authors:  Raffaella Franciotti; Stefania D'Ascenzo; Alberto Di Domenico; Marco Onofrj; Luca Tommasi; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Ayako Saneyoshi; Chikashi Michimata
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-09-19

7.  Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?

Authors:  Lei Yuan; David Uttal; Steven Franconeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.