Literature DB >> 24858009

Lateralized perception: the role of attention in spatial relation processing.

Ineke J M van der Ham1, Albert Postma2, Bruno Laeng3.   

Abstract

Any spatial situation can be approached either categorically - the window is to my left - or coordinately - the glass is 20cm away from the bottle. Since the first description of the distinction between categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing, it has often been shown that they are processed by at least partially different underlying mechanisms, mainly located in the left and right hemisphere, respectively. A number of recent studies have suggested that spatial attention plays a particularly important part in the perception of space: categorical processing benefits from a local focus of attention, and coordinate processing profits from a global focus of attention. This suggests that the lateralization pattern is modified by the concurrent size of the attentional focus, and is consequently more dynamic than previously thought. Therefore, a thorough revision of earlier theories on spatial relation processing is in order. In this review, we present a new model on lateralization of spatial relation processing that explicitly describes the role of spatial attention.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Hemispheric lateralization; Spatial attention; Spatial relation processing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24858009     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  8 in total

1.  Connectivity measures in the Poffenberger paradigm indicate hemispheric asymmetries.

Authors:  N Erbil; Suha Yagcioglu
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2016 Oct/Dec

2.  Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Jantina Brummelman; Marie Elise Aerts; Alyanne M de Haan; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-09-04

3.  Functional and structural benefits of separately operating right and left thalamo-cortical networks.

Authors:  Thomas Brandt; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Frames of reference and categorical/coordinate spatial relations in a "what was where" task.

Authors:  Francesco Ruotolo; Tina Iachini; Gennaro Ruggiero; Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hemispheric differences in relational reasoning: novel insights based on an old technique.

Authors:  Michael S Vendetti; Elizabeth L Johnson; Connor J Lemos; Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?

Authors:  Lei Yuan; David Uttal; Steven Franconeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Time takes space: selective effects of multitasking on concurrent spatial processing.

Authors:  Timo Mäntylä; Valentina Coni; Veit Kubik; Ivo Todorov; Fabio Del Missier
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-03-18

8.  Horses show individual level lateralisation when inspecting an unfamiliar and unexpected stimulus.

Authors:  Paolo Baragli; Chiara Scopa; Martina Felici; Adam R Reddon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.