Literature DB >> 22119165

Flexible visual processing of spatial relationships.

Steven L Franconeri1, Jason M Scimeca, Jessica C Roth, Sarah A Helseth, Lauren E Kahn.   

Abstract

Visual processing breaks the world into parts and objects, allowing us not only to examine the pieces individually, but also to perceive the relationships among them. There is work exploring how we perceive spatial relationships within structures with existing representations, such as faces, common objects, or prototypical scenes. But strikingly, there is little work on the perceptual mechanisms that allow us to flexibly represent arbitrary spatial relationships, e.g., between objects in a novel room, or the elements within a map, graph or diagram. We describe two classes of mechanism that might allow such judgments. In the simultaneous class, both objects are selected concurrently. In contrast, we propose a sequential class, where objects are selected individually over time. We argue that this latter mechanism is more plausible even though it violates our intuitions. We demonstrate that shifts of selection do occur during spatial relationship judgments that feel simultaneous, by tracking selection with an electrophysiological correlate. We speculate that static structure across space may be encoded as a dynamic sequence across time. Flexible visual spatial relationship processing may serve as a case study of more general visual relation processing beyond space, to other dimensions such as size or numerosity.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22119165     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  19 in total

1.  The head of the table: marking the "front" of an object is tightly linked with selection.

Authors:  Yangqing Xu; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Focusing on what matters: Modulation of the human hippocampus by relational attention.

Authors:  Natalia I Córdova; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Mariam Aly
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Not-So-CLEVR: learning same-different relations strains feedforward neural networks.

Authors:  Junkyung Kim; Matthew Ricci; Thomas Serre
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Facilitatory priming of scene layout depends on experience with the scene.

Authors:  Thomas Sanocki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

5.  Perception of average value in multiclass scatterplots.

Authors:  Michael Gleicher; Michael Correll; Christine Nothelfer; Steven Franconeri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.579

6.  Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Jantina Brummelman; Marie Elise Aerts; Alyanne M de Haan; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-09-04

7.  Visual routines for extracting magnitude relations.

Authors:  Audrey L Michal; David Uttal; Priti Shah; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

8.  Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.

Authors:  Jonas Lins; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Beyond the feedforward sweep: feedback computations in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Gabriel Kreiman; Thomas Serre
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.