Literature DB >> 20186107

Prism adaptation influences perception but not attention: evidence from antisaccades.

Tanja Nijboer1, Anneloes Vree, Chris Dijkerman, Stefan Van der Stigchel.   

Abstract

Prism adaptation has been shown to successfully alleviate symptoms of hemispatial neglect, yet the underlying mechanism is still poorly understood. In this study, the antisaccade task was used to measure the effects of prism adaptation on spatial attention in healthy participants. Results indicated that prism adaptation did not influence the saccade latencies or antisaccade errors, both strong measures of attentional deployment, despite a successful prism adaptation procedure. In contrast to visual attention, prism adaptation evoked a perceptual bias in visual space as measured by the landmark task. We conclude that prism adaptation has a differential influence on visual attention and visual perception in healthy participants as measured by the tasks used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186107     DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328337f95f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  10 in total

1.  Adaptation to Leftward Shifting Prisms Alters Motor Interhemispheric Inhibition.

Authors:  Elisa Martín-Arévalo; Selene Schintu; Alessandro Farnè; Laure Pisella; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Jantina Brummelman; Marie Elise Aerts; Alyanne M de Haan; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-09-04

3.  A note on Striemer and Danckert's theory of prism adaptation in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  Styrmir Saevarsson; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Prism adaptation does not alter object-based attention in healthy participants.

Authors:  Janet H Bultitude; Alexandra List; Anne M Aimola Davies
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-11-04

5.  Prism adaptation does not alter configural processing of faces.

Authors:  Janet H Bultitude; Paul E Downing; Robert D Rafal
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-10-14

6.  Saccadic eye movements in depressed elderly patients.

Authors:  Nicolas Carvalho; Nicolas Noiret; Pierre Vandel; Julie Monnin; Gilles Chopard; Eric Laurent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prismatic Adaptation Induces Plastic Changes onto Spatial and Temporal Domains in Near and Far Space.

Authors:  Ivan Patané; Alessandro Farnè; Francesca Frassinetti
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Improvement of phonemic fluency following leftward prism adaptation.

Authors:  Patrizia Turriziani; Gabriele Chiaramonte; Giuseppa Renata Mangano; Rosario Emanuele Bonaventura; Daniela Smirni; Massimiliano Oliveri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The feasibility of computer-based prism adaptation to ameliorate neglect in sub-acute stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation center.

Authors:  Miranda Smit; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Mirjam Kouwenhoven; Anja L H Eijsackers; Tanja C W Nijboer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Beyond the Sensorimotor Plasticity: Cognitive Expansion of Prism Adaptation in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Carine Michel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.