Literature DB >> 22278218

Perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests among members of a large managed care organization.

Alanna Kulchak Rahm1, Heather Spencer Feigelson, Nicole Wagner, Anh Quynh Le, Eve Halterman, Nadine Cornish, James W Dearing.   

Abstract

This small qualitative study was designed to determine possible attitudes toward and understanding of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing among members of a large managed care organization, and whether differences might exist between population groups. Ten focus groups were conducted by population type (high risk, White, African American, Hispanic/Latino) to determine knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about DTC genetics. Focus group transcripts were coded for attitudes toward and framing of the issue. Study results found participants were negative towards DTC genetic testing but they also found some aspects useful. Participants framed the issue mainly in terms of disease prevention and uncertainty of reaction to results, with some variation between population types. The concept of an "Informed Consumer," or process to seek information when the issue becomes personally relevant, emerged. This concept suggests that individuals may seek additional assistance to make personally-appropriate choices when faced with a DTC advertisement or genetic test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22278218     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9477-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  46 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006.

Authors:  Katrina A B Goddard; Debra Duquette; Amy Zlot; Jenny Johnson; Ann Annis-Emeott; Patrick W Lee; Mary Pat Bland; Karen L Edwards; Kristin Oehlke; Rebecca T Giles; Ann Rafferty; Michelle L Cook; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Why John Stuart Mill would support restriction on DTC marketing of genetic tests.

Authors:  Joan L McGregor
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Genetic risk information for common diseases may indeed be already useful for prevention and early detection.

Authors:  J Gulcher; K Stefansson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.686

5.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Personal genomics as an interactive web broadcast.

Authors:  Ainsley J Newson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Personal genomics: democratization, or empowerment, or 'something'.

Authors:  Chris MacDonald; Nancy Walton
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Christina M Diaz; Tao Wang; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Risks of presymptomatic direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Justin P Annes; Monica A Giovanni; Michael F Murray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  13 in total

1.  Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Michael J Bamshad; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Genetics patients' perspectives on clinical genomic testing.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Allison Glinka; Janelle Highland; George Asaad; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Jenny Ostergren
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2013-09

4.  Racial minority group interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing: findings from the PGen study.

Authors:  Latrice Landry; Daiva Elena Nielsen; Deanna Alexis Carere; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-09-04

5.  Primary care patients' views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Katherine Wasson; Tonya Nashay Sanders; Nancy S Hogan; Sara Cherny; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-07-07

6.  Perceptions of African-American health professionals and community members on the participation of children and pregnant women in genetic research.

Authors:  E M Ngui; T D Warner; L W Roberts
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Can Precision Medicine Actually Help People Like Me? African American and Hispanic Perspectives on the Benefits and Barriers of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Vivian M Yeh; Erin M Bergner; Marino A Bruce; Sunil Kripalani; Victoria B Mitrani; Titilola A Ogunsola; Consuelo H Wilkins; Derek M Griffith
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.847

9.  Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests from four state population-based surveys, and implications for clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Katherine Kolor; Debra Duquette; Amy Zlot; Joan Foland; Beth Anderson; Rebecca Giles; Jennifer Wrathall; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Karen J Ruth; David Yt Chen; Laura M Gross; Veda N Giri
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.